Machine-learning in grading of gliomas based on multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging at 3T

OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to assess the contribution of multi-parametric (mp) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) quantitative features in the machine learning-based grading of gliomas with a multi-region-of-interests approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS Forty-three patients who were newly diagnosed as having a glioma were included in this study. The patients were scanned prior to any therapy using a standard brain tumor magnetic resonance (MR) imaging protocol that included T1 and T2-weighted, diffusion-weighted, diffusion tensor, MR perfusion and MR spectroscopic imaging. Three different regions-of-interest were drawn for each subject to encompass tumor, immediate tumor periphery, and distant peritumoral edema/normal. The normalized mp-MRI features were used to build machine-learning models for differentiating low-grade gliomas (WHO grades I and II) from high grades (WHO grades III and IV). In order to assess the contribution of regional mp-MRI quantitative features to the classification models, a support vector machine-based recursive feature elimination method was applied prior to classification. RESULTS A machine-learning model based on support vector machine algorithm with linear kernel achieved an accuracy of 93.0%, a specificity of 86.7%, and a sensitivity of 96.4% for the grading of gliomas using ten-fold cross validation based on the proposed subset of the mp-MRI features. CONCLUSION In this study, machine-learning based on multiregional and multi-parametric MRI data has proven to be an important tool in grading glial tumors accurately even in this limited patient population. Future studies are needed to investigate the use of machine learning algorithms for brain tumor classification in a larger patient cohort.

[1]  Andreas Zell,et al.  Feature Selection for Descriptor Based Classification Models. 1. Theory and GA-SEC Algorithm , 2004, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[2]  Stephen T. C. Wong,et al.  Support vector machine multiparametric MRI identification of pseudoprogression from tumor recurrence in patients with resected glioblastoma , 2011, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[3]  R. Henry,et al.  Perfusion, diffusion and spectroscopy values in newly diagnosed cerebral gliomas , 2006, NMR in biomedicine.

[4]  G. Winston The physical and biological basis of quantitative parameters derived from diffusion MRI. , 2012, Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery.

[5]  Peter J Park,et al.  Meta-analysis of glioblastoma multiforme versus anaplastic astrocytoma identifies robust gene markers , 2009, Molecular Cancer.

[6]  Frank G Zöllner,et al.  Support vector machines in DSC‐based glioma imaging: Suggestions for optimal characterization , 2010, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  Guy Cosnard,et al.  Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to differentiate high-grade gliomas and brain metastases. , 2012, Journal of neuroradiology. Journal de neuroradiologie.

[8]  H. Almassry,et al.  Preoperative glioma grading by MR diffusion and MR spectroscopic imaging , 2016 .

[9]  Christos Davatzikos,et al.  Classification of brain tumor type and grade using MRI texture and shape in a machine learning scheme , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  G Johnson,et al.  Comparing perfusion metrics obtained from a single compartment versus pharmacokinetic modeling methods using dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging with glioma grade. , 2006, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[11]  N. Fayed,et al.  Contrast/Noise ratio on conventional MRI and choline/creatine ratio on proton MRI spectroscopy accurately discriminate low-grade from high-grade cerebral gliomas. , 2006, Academic radiology.

[12]  Soonmee Cha,et al.  Imaging Glioblastoma Multiforme , 2003, Cancer journal.

[13]  W P Dillon,et al.  Preoperative proton MR spectroscopic imaging of brain tumors: correlation with histopathologic analysis of resection specimens. , 2001, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[14]  M. Essig,et al.  Perfusion MRI: the five most frequently asked technical questions. , 2013, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[15]  Michael H Lev,et al.  Glial tumor grading and outcome prediction using dynamic spin-echo MR susceptibility mapping compared with conventional contrast-enhanced MR: confounding effect of elevated rCBV of oligodendrogliomas [corrected]. , 2004, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[16]  P Abdolmaleki,et al.  Neural networks analysis of astrocytic gliomas from MRI appearances. , 1997, Cancer letters.

[17]  Ho Yun Lee,et al.  Diffusion-Tensor Imaging for Glioma Grading at 3-T Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Analysis of Fractional Anisotropy and Mean Diffusivity , 2008, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[18]  อนิรุธ สืบสิงห์,et al.  Data Mining Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques , 2014 .

[19]  Martin Sill,et al.  Radiogenomics of Glioblastoma: Machine Learning-based Classification of Molecular Characteristics by Using Multiparametric and Multiregional MR Imaging Features. , 2016, Radiology.

[20]  Daniel M. Spielman,et al.  Utility of multiparametric 3-T MRI for glioma characterization , 2013, Neuroradiology.

[21]  A. Server,et al.  Analysis of diffusion tensor imaging metrics for gliomas grading at 3 T. , 2014, European journal of radiology.

[22]  Frank G Zoellner,et al.  Predictive modeling in glioma grading from MR perfusion images using support vector machines , 2008, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[23]  Vinod Kumar,et al.  A dual neural network ensemble approach for multiclass brain tumor classification , 2012, International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering.

[24]  A. Škoch,et al.  Potential of MR spectroscopy for assessment of glioma grading , 2013, Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery.

[25]  S. Price The role of advanced MR imaging in understanding brain tumour pathology , 2007, British journal of neurosurgery.

[26]  Massimo Caulo,et al.  Data-driven grading of brain gliomas: a multiparametric MR imaging study. , 2014, Radiology.

[27]  Chung-Ming Lo,et al.  Quantitative glioma grading using transformed gray-scale invariant textures of MRI , 2017, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[28]  Sungheon Kim,et al.  Differentiation between glioblastomas and solitary brain metastases using diffusion tensor imaging , 2009, NeuroImage.

[29]  Sabine Van Huffel,et al.  Integrating diffusion kurtosis imaging, dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced MRI, and short echo time chemical shift imaging for grading gliomas. , 2014, Neuro-oncology.

[30]  Frank G Zöllner,et al.  SVM-based glioma grading: Optimization by feature reduction analysis. , 2012, Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik.

[31]  J. Friedman Special Invited Paper-Additive logistic regression: A statistical view of boosting , 2000 .

[32]  A. Awasthi,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of automatic normalization of CBV in glioma grading using T1- weighted DCE-MRI. , 2017, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[33]  G. Criscuolo,et al.  Vascular endothelial growth/permeability factor expression in human glioma specimens: correlation with vasogenic brain edema and tumor-associated cysts. , 1995, Journal of neurosurgery.

[34]  Chung-Ming Lo,et al.  Computer-aided grading of gliomas based on local and global MRI features , 2017, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[35]  Hyunsoo Kim,et al.  Sparse Non-negative Matrix Factorizations via Alternating Non-negativity-constrained Least Squares , 2006 .

[36]  Ron Kohavi,et al.  Wrappers for Feature Subset Selection , 1997, Artif. Intell..

[37]  D. Louis,et al.  Glioma classification: a molecular reappraisal. , 2001, The American journal of pathology.

[38]  E F Halpern,et al.  Cerebral blood volume maps of gliomas: comparison with tumor grade and histologic findings. , 1994, Radiology.

[39]  N. Chalabi,et al.  Potential role of quantitative MRI assessment in differentiating high from low-grade gliomas , 2016 .

[40]  Z. Song,et al.  Differentiation between low-grade and high-grade glioma using combined diffusion tensor imaging metrics , 2013, Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery.

[41]  Chih-Jen Lin,et al.  LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines , 2011, TIST.

[42]  C. Davatzikos,et al.  Survival Analysis of Patients with High-Grade Gliomas Based on Data Mining of Imaging Variables , 2012, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[43]  H. Tantawy,et al.  High grade gliomas: The role of dynamic contrast-enhanced susceptibility-weighted perfusion MRI and proton MR spectroscopic imaging in differentiating grade III from grade IV , 2016 .

[44]  B. Jiang,et al.  Apparent diffusion coefficient maps obtained from high b value diffusion-weighted imaging in the preoperative evaluation of gliomas at 3T: comparison with standard b value diffusion-weighted imaging , 2017, European Radiology.

[45]  Max Wintermark,et al.  Perfusion MRI: the five most frequently asked clinical questions. , 2013, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[46]  T. Stadnik,et al.  Prognostic value of perfusion-weighted imaging in brain glioma: a prospective study , 2006, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[47]  Jie Yang,et al.  Degree prediction of malignancy in brain glioma using support vector machines , 2006, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[48]  Mitchel S Berger,et al.  Regional variation in histopathologic features of tumor specimens from treatment-naive glioblastoma correlates with anatomic and physiologic MR Imaging. , 2012, Neuro-oncology.

[49]  Mahlon D. Johnson,et al.  MR diffusion tensor and perfusion-weighted imaging in preoperative grading of supratentorial nonenhancing gliomas. , 2011, Neuro-oncology.

[50]  Trevor Hastie,et al.  Additive Logistic Regression : a Statistical , 1998 .

[51]  B. Scheithauer,et al.  The 2007 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system , 2007, Acta Neuropathologica.