Cascading Impacts of Payments for Ecosystem Services in Complex Human-Environment Systems

The theory and practice associated with payments for ecosystem services (PES) feature a variety of piecemeal studies related to impacts of socioeconomic, demographic, and environmental variables, lacking e orts in understanding their mutual relationships in a spatially and temporally explicit manner. In addition, PES literature is short of ecological metrics that document the consequences of PES other than land use and land cover and its change. Building on detailed survey data from Fanjingshan National Nature Reserve (FNNR), China, we developed and tested an agent-basedmodel to study the complex interactions among human livelihoods (migration and resource extraction in particular), PES, and the Guizhou golden monkey habitat occupancy over 20 years. We then performed simulation-based experiments testing social and ecological impacts of PES payments as well as human population pressures. The results show that with a steady increase in outmigration, the number of land parcels enrolled in one of China’s major PES programs tends to increase, reach a peak, and then slowly decline, showing a convex trend that converges to a stable number of enrolled parcels regardless of payment levels. Simulated monkey occupancy responds to changes in PES payment levels substantially in edge areas of FNNR. Our model is not only useful for FNNR, but also applicable as a platform to study and further understand human and ecological roles of PES in many other complex human-environment systems, shedding light into key elements, interactions, or relationships in the systems that PES researchers and practitioners should bear inmind. Our research contributes to establishing a scientific basis of PES science that incorporates features in complex systems, o eringmore realistic, spatially and temporally explicit insights related to PES policy or related interventions.

[1]  D. Stow,et al.  Assessing the effects of payments for ecosystem services programs on forest structure and species biodiversity , 2020, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[2]  Li An,et al.  Editorial: Meeting Grand Challenges in Agent-Based Models , 2020, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[3]  Leigh Tesfatsion,et al.  Modeling economic systems as locally-constructive sequential games , 2017 .

[4]  Xiaodong Chen,et al.  Reframing the payments for ecosystem services framework in a coupled human and natural systems context: strengthening the integration between ecological and human dimensions , 2017 .

[5]  Sean Charles Ahearn,et al.  A context-sensitive correlated random walk: a new simulation model for movement , 2017, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[6]  Ashton M. Shortridge,et al.  Effects of payments for ecosystem services on wildlife habitat recovery , 2016, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[7]  Stefanie Engel,et al.  The Devil in the Detail: A Practical Guide on Designing Payments for Environmental Services , 2016 .

[8]  Li An,et al.  Quantifying canopy fractional cover and change in Fanjingshan National Nature Reserve, China using multi-temporal Landsat imagery , 2016 .

[9]  Sara S. Metcalf,et al.  Strategic directions for agent-based modeling: avoiding the YAAWN syndrome , 2016, Journal of land use science.

[10]  Bin Yang,et al.  Snub-nosed monkeys (Rhinopithecus spp.): conservation challenges in the face of environmental uncertainty , 2016 .

[11]  M. Requier-Desjardins,et al.  The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development , 2015, An Insider's Guide to the UN.

[12]  Thomas Sikor,et al.  Notions of Justice in Payments for Ecosystem Services:Insights from China’s Sloping Land Conversion Program in Yunnan Province , 2015 .

[13]  E. Garmendia,et al.  Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES) in the face of external biophysical stressors , 2015 .

[14]  Li An,et al.  Annals of the Association of American Geographers Agent-based Modeling in Coupled Human and Natural Systems (chans): Lessons from a Comparative Analysis , 2022 .

[15]  Arun Agrawal,et al.  Understanding the Social and Ecological Outcomes of PES Projects: A Review and an Analysis , 2013 .

[16]  Yeqin Yang,et al.  Altitudinal Movements of Guizhou Snub-Nosed Monkeys (Rhinopithecus brelichi) in Fanjingshan National Nature Reserve, China: Implications for Conservation Management of a Flagship Species , 2010, Folia Primatologica.

[17]  J. Gareth Polhill,et al.  The ODD protocol: A review and first update , 2010, Ecological Modelling.

[18]  David A. Bennett,et al.  Agent‐based Modeling of Animal Movement: A Review , 2010 .

[19]  Liu Jian-guo China's Environment in a Globalizing World—How China and the Rest of the World Affect Each Other , 2009 .

[20]  Jianguo Liu,et al.  Ecological and socioeconomic effects of China's policies for ecosystem services , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  Pamela A Matson,et al.  Ecosystem services: From theory to implementation , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  S. Wunder Payments for environmental services and the poor: concepts and preliminary evidence , 2008, Environment and Development Economics.

[23]  G. Huse Individual‐based Modeling and Ecology , 2008 .

[24]  Gang Wu,et al.  Habitat selection of Guizhou golden monkey (Phinopithecus roxellanae brelichi) in Fanjing Mountain Biosphere Reserve, China , 2004, Journal of Forestry Research.

[25]  Elinor Ostrom,et al.  Coupled Human and Natural Systems , 2007, Ambio.

[26]  Elinor Ostrom,et al.  Complexity of Coupled Human and Natural Systems , 2007, Science.

[27]  Stephen J. Walsh,et al.  Landscape Frontiers, Geography Frontiers: Lessons to Be Learned , 2006 .

[28]  Birgit Müller,et al.  A standard protocol for describing individual-based and agent-based models , 2006 .

[29]  J. Diamond,et al.  China's environment in a globalizing world , 2005, Nature.

[30]  S. Rozelle,et al.  Grain for Green: Cost-Effectiveness and Sustainability of China’s Conservation Set-Aside Program , 2005, Land Economics.

[31]  Ashton M. Shortridge,et al.  Exploring Complexity in a Human–Environment System: An Agent-Based Spatial Model for Multidisciplinary and Multiscale Integration , 2005 .

[32]  S. Wunder Payments for environmental services : Some nuts and bolts , 2022 .

[33]  S. N. Trigg,et al.  Lowland Forest Loss in Protected Areas of Indonesian Borneo , 2004, Science.

[34]  N. Zhu The impacts of income gaps on migration decisions in China , 2002 .

[35]  S. Manson Simplifying complexity: a review of complexity theory , 2001 .

[36]  E. Irwin,et al.  Theory, data, methods: developing spatially explicit economic models of land use change , 2001 .

[37]  J. Liu,et al.  Ecological Degradation in Protected Areas: The Case of Wolong Nature Reserve for Giant Pandas , 2001, Science.

[38]  R. Mittermeier,et al.  Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities , 2000, Nature.

[39]  Jean Carletta,et al.  Assessing Agreement on Classification Tasks: The Kappa Statistic , 1996, CL.

[40]  W. Bleisch,et al.  Preliminary results from a field study of wild Guizhou snub-nosed monkeys (Rhinopithecus brelichi). , 1993, Folia primatologica; international journal of primatology.