Broadening the Scope of Methodological Research on Mail Surveys

Methodological studies on mail surveys typically assess the effectiveness of a device with respect to only one dependent variable—response rate. Other factors in the use of mail surveys, i.e. response speed and quality, also require methodological research. This report includes a discussion of these factors and a review of the findings of studies that have included them as dependent variables.

[1]  Don A. Dillman,et al.  Contribution of personalization to mail questionnaire response as an element of a previously tested method. , 1974 .

[2]  John R. Nevin,et al.  Effects of a deadline and a veiled threat on mail survey responses. , 1976 .

[3]  A. L. Ferriss A Note on Stimulating Response to Questionnaires , 1951 .

[4]  W. E. Cox Response Patterns to Mail Surveys , 1966 .

[5]  Carol H. Fuller,et al.  Effect of anonymity on return rate and response bias in a mail survey. , 1974 .

[6]  John F. Veiga,et al.  Getting the mail questionnaire returned: Some practical research considerations. , 1974 .

[7]  F. B. Waisanen A Note on the Response to a Mailed Questionnaire , 1954 .

[8]  Nojin Kwak,et al.  Public Opinion Quarterly , 2022 .

[9]  H. S. Feild Effects of sex of investigator on mail survey response rates and response bias. , 1975 .

[10]  Eli P. Cox,et al.  Reappraising Mail Survey Response Rates , 1974 .

[11]  Robert A. Peterson,et al.  An experimental investigation of mail-survey responses , 1975 .

[12]  C. Scott Research on Mail Surveys , 1961 .

[13]  Hershey H. Friedman,et al.  Effect of ethnicity of signature on the rate of return and content of a mail questionnaire. , 1975 .

[14]  Michael J. Houston,et al.  The Negative Effects of Personalization on Response Patterns in Mail Surveys , 1975 .

[15]  A. S. Linsky STIMULATING RESPONSES TO MAILED QUESTIONNAIRES: A REVIEW , 1975 .

[16]  Robert Ferber,et al.  Effects of Compensation in Consumer Expenditure Studies , 1974 .

[17]  R. Ferber,et al.  Experiments in Obtaining Consumer Expenditures by Diary Methods , 1971 .

[18]  Frederick Wiseman,et al.  METHODOLOGICAL BIAS IN PUBLIC OPINION SURVEYS , 1972 .

[19]  H. T. Opinion surveys. , 1964, The Eugenics review.

[20]  B. Kroll,et al.  Methods of Increasing mail Response , 1957 .

[21]  Neil M. Ford The Advance Letter in Mail Surveys , 1967 .

[22]  W. R. Smelling The Impact of a Personalized Mail Questionnaire. , 1969 .

[23]  Robert Ferber,et al.  ITEM NONRESPONSE IN A CONSUMER SURVEY , 1966 .

[24]  L. Kanuk,et al.  Mail Surveys and Response Rates: A Literature Review , 1975 .

[25]  Thomas R. Wotruba,et al.  Monetary Inducements and Mail Questionnaire Response , 1966 .