The Montclair Map Task: Balance, Efficacy, and Efficiency in Conversational Interaction

This paper introduces a conversational speech corpus collected during the completion of a map-matching task that is available for research purposes via the Montclair State University Digital Commons Data Repository. The Montclair Map Task is a new, role-neutral conversational task that involves paired iconic maps with labeled landmarks and a path drawn from a start point, around various landmarks, to a finish mark. One advantage of this task-oriented corpus is the ability to derive independent objective measures of task performance for both members of a conversational pair that can be related to aspects of communicative style. A total of 96 native English speakers completed the task in 16 same-sex female, 16 same-sex male, and 16 mixed-sex pairings. Conversations averaged 32 minutes in duration, yielding approximately 217,000 words. The transcription protocol delineates events such as speaking turns, inter-turn intervals, landmark phrases, fillers, pauses, overlaps, and backchannels, making this corpus a useful tool for investigating dynamics of conversational interaction. Analyses of communication efficacy and efficiency reveal that male pairs of talkers were less efficient than female and mixed-sex pairs with respect to partner map-matching task performance.

[1]  Herbert H. Clark,et al.  Coordinating beliefs in conversation , 1992 .

[2]  A. Mulac.  Men's and Women's Talk in Same-Gender and Mixed-Gender Dyads: Power or Polemic?' , 1989 .

[3]  Elisabeth Dévière,et al.  Analyzing linguistic data: a practical introduction to statistics using R , 2009 .

[4]  Anna K. Kuhlen,et al.  Two Minds, One Dialog , 2010 .

[5]  J. R. Mcmillan,et al.  Women's language: Uncertainty or interpersonal sensitivity and emotionality? , 1977 .

[6]  D. Bates,et al.  Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 , 2014, 1406.5823.

[7]  H. H. Clark,et al.  Understanding by addressees and overhearers , 1989, Cognitive Psychology.

[8]  P. Brockhoff,et al.  Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models , 2015 .

[9]  H. H. Clark,et al.  Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[10]  Jennifer S. Pardo,et al.  Influence of Role-Switching on Phonetic Convergence in Conversation , 2013 .

[11]  E. Cashdan.  Smiles, Speech, and Body Posture: How Women and Men Display Sociometric Status and Power , 1998 .

[12]  Jennifer S. Pardo,et al.  A comparison of phonetic convergence in conversational interaction and speech shadowing , 2018, J. Phonetics.

[13]  R. Krauss,et al.  Dominance and accommodation in the conversational behaviours of same- and mixed-gender dyads. , 1988 .

[14]  M. M. Wood,et al.  The Influence of Sex and Knowledge of Communication Effectiveness on Spontaneous Speech , 1966 .

[15]  E. Schegloff,et al.  A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation , 2015 .

[16]  C. Leaper,et al.  A Meta-Analytic Review of Gender Variations in Adults' Language Use: Talkativeness, Affiliative Speech, and Assertive Speech , 2007, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[17]  J. Simkins-Bullock,et al.  An investigation into the relationships between gender and language , 1991 .

[18]  D. Bates,et al.  Linear Mixed-Effects Models using 'Eigen' and S4 , 2015 .

[19]  R. Baayen,et al.  Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items , 2008 .

[20]  S. Brennan,et al.  Processes of Interactive Spoken Discourse: The Role of the Partner , 2003 .

[21]  David Miller,et al.  The Fisher Corpus: a Resource for the Next Generations of Speech-to-Text , 2004, LREC.

[22]  Jennifer S. Pardo,et al.  Parity and Disparity in Conversational Interaction , 2017 .

[23]  Jennifer S. Pardo,et al.  Conversational role influences speech imitation , 2010 .

[24]  H. Bergh,et al.  Examples of Mixed-Effects Modeling with Crossed Random Effects and with Binomial Data. , 2008 .

[25]  Susan Brennan,et al.  Entrainment on the Move and in the Lab: The Walking Around Corpus , 2013, CogSci.

[26]  H. H. Clark,et al.  Referring as a collaborative process , 1986, Cognition.

[27]  Jennifer S. Pardo,et al.  On phonetic convergence during conversational interaction. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  W. Labov,et al.  One Hundred Years of Sound Change in Philadelphia: Linear Incrementation, Reversal, and Reanalysis , 2013 .

[29]  D. Barr,et al.  Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. , 2013, Journal of memory and language.

[30]  Kristin J. Van Engen,et al.  The Wildcat Corpus of native- and foreign-accented English: communicative efficiency across conversational dyads with varying language alignment profiles. , 2007, Language and speech.

[31]  Robert M. Krauss,et al.  The Role of the Listener: Addressee Influences on Message Formulation , 1987 .

[32]  R. Krauss,et al.  Effects of Transmission Delay and Access Delay on the Efficiency of Verbal Communication , 1967 .

[33]  William D. Raymond,et al.  The Buckeye corpus of conversational speech: labeling conventions and a test of transcriber reliability , 2005, Speech Commun..

[34]  William Labov,et al.  The atlas of North American English : phonetics, phonology and sound change : a multimedia reference tool , 2006 .