Evaluation of Structural Reliability of Steel Frames: Interstory Drift versus Plastic Hysteretic Energy

The structural reliability in terms of maximum interstory drift—and, alternatively, in terms of plastic hysteretic energy—is evaluated for six regular moment-resisting steel frames designed according to the Mexico City Building Code, and located in the Lake Zone of that city. While the maximum interstory drift was used because of its relevance within the format of current seismic design codes, the plastic hysteretic energy was considered due to its importance for the performance of structures when subjected to severe cumulative plastic deformation demands. The demand hazard curves of the frames in terms of drift and energy are compared to provide a general idea of the reliability levels associated to the models, and to provide insights into which response parameter dominates their dynamic behavior and structural performance. In some cases, large differences are observed in the reliabilities computed by measure of the two different response parameters under consideration.

[1]  J. Wight,et al.  Strength Decay in R.C. Beams under Load Reversals , 1980 .

[2]  James O. Jirsa,et al.  Energy demands for seismic design against low‐cycle fatigue , 2007 .

[3]  Egor P. Popov,et al.  Experimental Performance of Seismic Steel Beam-Column Moment Joints , 1995 .

[4]  W. J. Hall,et al.  Seismic Design Methodologies for the Next Generation of Codes , 1999 .

[5]  A. Arias A measure of earthquake intensity , 1970 .

[6]  D. Darwin,et al.  ENERGY DISSIPATION IN RC BEAMS UNDER CYCLIC LOAD , 1986 .

[7]  Mario E. Rodriguez,et al.  Evaluation of a seismic damage parameter , 1999 .

[8]  Julian J. Bommer,et al.  A State-of-Knowledge Review of the Influence of Strong-Motion Duration on Structural Damage , 2006 .

[9]  Amador Teran-Gilmore,et al.  Cumulative Ductility Spectra for Seismic Design of Ductile Structures Subjected to Long Duration Motions: Concept and Theoretical Background , 2008 .

[10]  C. Allin Cornell,et al.  Probabilistic seismic demand analysis of nonlinear structures , 1999 .

[11]  Hong Hao,et al.  Energy appproach in peformance‐based seismic design of steel moment resisting frames for basic safety objective , 2001 .

[12]  Zila Rinaldi,et al.  Seismic performance evaluation for steel MRF: non linear dynamic and static analyses , 2002 .

[13]  G. W. Housner,et al.  Limit Design of Structures to Resist Earthquakes , 1956 .

[14]  Sonia E. Ruiz,et al.  Reliability-based evaluation of steel structures using energy concepts , 2008 .

[15]  J. Baker,et al.  A vector‐valued ground motion intensity measure consisting of spectral acceleration and epsilon , 2005 .

[16]  Nicolas Luco,et al.  Probabilistic seismic demand analysis using advanced ground motion intensity measures , 2007 .

[17]  Amador Terán Gilmore CONSIDERACIONES DE USO DE LA ENERGÍA PLÁSTICA EN EL DISEÑO SÍSMICO , 2001 .

[18]  Gaetano Manfredi,et al.  Evaluating A New Proxy For Spectral Shape To Be Used As An Intensity Measure , 2008 .

[19]  Egor P. Popov,et al.  Cyclic performance of steel beam-column moment joints , 1995 .

[20]  Eduardo Miranda,et al.  Probabilistic Response Assessment for Building-Specific Loss Estimation , 2003 .

[21]  Paolo Bazzurro,et al.  Probabilistic seismic demand analysis , 1998 .

[22]  Mario Ordaz,et al.  Hysteretic Energy Demands for SDOF Systems Subjected to Narrow Band Earthquake Ground Motions. Applications to the Lake Bed Zone of Mexico City , 2007 .

[23]  Jack W. Baker,et al.  VECTOR-VALUED INTENSITY MEASURES FOR PULSE-LIKE NEAR-FAULT GROUND MOTIONS , 2008 .

[24]  Iunio Iervolino,et al.  Spectral shape proxies and nonlinear structural response , 2011 .

[25]  Benjamín Huerta Garnica,et al.  ESPECTROS DE ENERGÍA DE MOVIMIENTOS FUERTES REGISTRADOS EN MÉXICO , 2002 .

[26]  E. Bojórquez,et al.  EFFECTS OF DEGRADING MODELS FOR DUCTILITY AND DISSIPATED HYSTERETIC ENERGY IN UNIFORM ANNUAL FAILURE RATE SPECTRA , 2008 .

[27]  James O. Jirsa,et al.  SHEAR REQUIREMENTS FOR LOAD REVERSALS ON RC MEMBERS , 1977 .

[28]  C. Cornell Engineering seismic risk analysis , 1968 .

[29]  A. G. Brady,et al.  A STUDY ON THE DURATION OF STRONG EARTHQUAKE GROUND MOTION , 1975 .