Enhancing Information Services through Public-Private Partnerships: Information Technology Knowledge Transfer Underlying Structures to Develop Shared Services in the U.S. and Korea

What are e-government success factors for using public-private partnerships to enhance learning and capacity development? To examine this question, the authors developed a comparative case analysis of the development of the Business Reference Model (BRM), a national-level e-government initiative to promote shared information services, in the U.S. federal government and the Korean central government. The results indicate institutional arrangements deeply affect the outcomes of knowledge transfer. The study shows that private sector partners in both countries played various roles as “brokers” of information technology (IT) knowledge between government and the private sector by: raising awareness of the necessity of the BRM; providing best practices; developing pilot projects; and developing implementation strategies. However, the study finds that the two countries took entirely different approaches to working with non-governmental organizations in BRM development with implications for project success and lessons for e-government success. The study is meant to deepen understanding of the embeddedness of public-private partnerships in institutional contexts and the implications of such institutional arrangements for knowledge sharing on e-government success. The study examines knowledge transfer in the context of similarities and differences in partnership structures across two advanced industrialized countries with leading roles in e-governance.

[1]  A. Ni,et al.  Th e Decision to Contract Out: A Study of Contracting for E‐Government Services in State Governments , 2007 .

[2]  Soumitra Sharma Exploring Best Practices in Public Private Partnership (PPP) in e-Government through Select Asian Case Studies , 2007, CSREA EEE.

[3]  Andrew B. Hargadon Brokering knowledge: Linking learning and innovation , 2002 .

[4]  P. Hall Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: the case of economic policymaking in Britain , 1993 .

[5]  Hyun-Soo Han,et al.  Analyzing the impact of a firm's capability on outsourcing success: A process perspective , 2008, Inf. Manag..

[6]  Robert E. Goodin,et al.  The Oxford Handbook of Contextual Political Analysis , 2006 .

[7]  Graham Pervan,et al.  Issues and recommendations in evaluating and managing the benefits of public sector IS/IT outsourcing , 2007, Inf. Technol. People.

[8]  M. Granger Morgan Computer-Based National Information Systems: Technology and Public Policy Issues , 1982 .

[9]  B. Burnes,et al.  Outsourcing: a public‐private sector comparison , 2003 .

[10]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[11]  Edgar Grande,et al.  Complex sovereignty : reconstituting political authority in the twenty-first century , 2005 .

[12]  P. Pierson Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics , 2000, American Political Science Review.

[13]  E. Ferlie,et al.  The Oxford Handbook of Public Management , 2007 .

[14]  D. Lewis Non-governmental organizations , 2009 .

[15]  L. Salamon,et al.  The tools of government : a guide to the new governance , 2002 .

[16]  K. Thelen Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences: HOW INSTITUTIONS EVOLVE , 2003 .

[17]  John W. Langford,et al.  Partnering for e-government: Challenges for public administrators , 2001 .

[18]  Kalindi Vora Information Technology Professionals , 2015 .

[19]  L. Salamon,et al.  The New Governance and the Tools of Public Action: An Introduction , 2011 .

[20]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  The Role of Intermediating Institutions in the Diffusion of Electronic Data Interchange (EDI): How Industry Associations Intervened in Denmark, Finland, and Hong Kong , 2001, Inf. Soc..

[21]  Jane E. Fountain,et al.  Challenges to Organizational Change: Multi-Level Integrated Information Structures (MIIS) , 2006 .

[22]  T. Skocpol,et al.  States, Social Knowledge, and the Origins of Modern Social Policies , 1997 .

[23]  William Creager,et al.  Office of Technology Assessment (OTA) , 2001 .

[24]  James L. Perry,et al.  Outsourcing for E-Government , 2003 .

[25]  K. Okma Dismantling the Welfare State? Reagan, Thatcher, and the Politics of Retrenchment , 1998 .

[26]  Seok-Jin Eom,et al.  “Institutional Dimensions of e-Government Development , 2013 .

[27]  T. Gough,et al.  School of Computing Research Report Series Comparative Analysis between the Public and Private Sectors on the Is/it Outsourcing Practices in a Developing Country: a Field Study , 2022 .

[28]  W. Currie Outsourcing in the private and public sectors: an unpredictable IT strategy , 1996 .

[29]  Z. Wal,et al.  Central Values of Government and Business: Differences, Similarities and Conflicts1 , 2006, Public Administration Quarterly.

[30]  R. Cox The Social Construction of an Imperative: Why Welfare Reform Happened in Denmark and the Netherlands but Not in Germany , 2001, World politics.

[31]  John L. Campbell Institutional Change and Globalization , 2020 .

[32]  Adam Sheingate Political Entrepreneurship, Institutional Change, and American Political Development , 2003, Studies in American Political Development.

[33]  Eur. N. Loukis,et al.  Digital Era Governance--IT Corporations, the State and e-Government , 2007 .

[34]  J. Brown,et al.  Organizing Knowledge , 1998 .

[35]  R. Schiffer,et al.  INTRODUCTION , 1988, Neurology.

[36]  B. Peters,et al.  Governance, Politics and the State , 2000 .

[37]  John Langford,et al.  E-government and public-private partnerships in Canada: when failure is no longer an option , 2006, Int. J. Electron. Bus..

[38]  J. Fountain Building the Virtual State: Information Technology and Institutional Change , 2001 .

[39]  P. Hall Policy Innovation and the Structure of the State: The Politics-Administration Nexus in France and Britain , 1983 .

[40]  Junghoon Moon,et al.  IT outsourcing for E-government: Lessons from IT outsourcing projects initiated by agricultural organizations of the Korean government , 2007, 2007 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'07).

[41]  Leslie P. Willcocks,et al.  Survey of IT Outsourcing Experiences in US and UK Organizations , 2000, J. Glob. Inf. Manag..

[42]  Jacky Swan,et al.  The diffusion, design and social shaping of production management information systems in Europe , 2000, Inf. Technol. People.

[43]  M. Feldman,et al.  The Role of the Public Manager in Inclusion: Creating Communities of Participation , 2007 .

[44]  J. Gibney Knowledge in a “Shared and Interdependent World”: Implications for a Progressive Leadership of Cities and Regions , 2011 .

[45]  J. Fountain Bringing Institutions Back In to Strategic Management: The Politics of Digitally Mediated Institutional Change , 2011 .

[46]  M. Bevir,et al.  The SAGE Handbook of Governance , 2022 .

[47]  Fred Thompson The Oxford handbook of public management , 2007 .

[48]  Abdulwahed Mohammed Khalfan,et al.  Information security considerations in IS/IT outsourcing projects: a descriptive case study of two sectors , 2004, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[49]  Sanford Borins,et al.  Digital State at the Leading Edge , 2007 .

[50]  Jane E. Fountain Prospects for the Virtual State , 2004 .

[51]  Robert O. Keohane,et al.  Ideas and Foreign Policy Beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change , 1994 .

[52]  Suzanne D. Pawlowski,et al.  Bridging User Organizations: Knowledge Brokering and the Work of Information Technology Professionals , 2004, MIS Q..

[53]  Bruce Rocheleau,et al.  Public management information systems , 2005 .

[54]  M. L. Gordon,et al.  Outsourcing technology in government: Owned, controlled, or regulated institutions , 1997 .

[55]  D. Rueschemeyer Why and How Ideas Matter , 2006 .

[56]  Patrick Dunleavy,et al.  Digital Era Governance , 2006 .

[57]  Nick Butler,et al.  What is management consultancy , 2009 .

[58]  Theresa A. Pardo,et al.  E-government success factors: Mapping practical tools to theoretical foundations , 2005, Gov. Inf. Q..

[59]  P. Hall The Political Power of Economic Ideas: Keynesianism across Nations , 1989 .

[60]  E. Wenger Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[61]  H. Margetts Information Technology in Government: Britain and America , 1998 .

[62]  Sue Newell,et al.  Central Agencies in the Diffusion and Design of Technology: A Comparison of the UK and Sweden , 1999 .

[63]  Denis Saint-Martin Building the new managerialist state , 2000 .

[64]  Junghoon Moon,et al.  Determinants of relationship quality for IS/IT outsourcing success in public sector , 2012, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[65]  E. Ferlie On Building the New Managerialist State , 2003 .

[66]  Qing Hu,et al.  Influential Factors in IT Sourcing Decisions of Norwegian Public Sector: An Exploratory Study , 2003, AMCIS.

[67]  P. Pierson Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis , 2004 .

[68]  Morgan Meyer The Rise of the Knowledge Broker , 2010 .

[69]  J. Fountain Information, Institutions and Governance: Advancing a Basic Social Science Research Program for Digital Government , 2003 .

[70]  Chris Skelcher,et al.  Public–Private Partnerships and Hybridity , 2007 .

[71]  Jeffrey W. Seifert Federal Enterprise Architecture and E-Government: Issues for Information Technology Management , 2006 .

[72]  Sonia Gantman Vilvovsky,et al.  Differences between public and private IT outsourcing: common themes in the literature , 2008, DG.O.

[73]  P. Pierson Dismantling the Welfare State?: Reagan, Thatcher and the Politics of Retrenchment , 1994 .