Seismic fragility assessment of concrete gravity dams

Many concrete gravity dams have been in service for over 50 years, and over this period important advances in the methodologies for evaluation of natural phenomena hazards have caused the design-basis events for these dams to be revised upwards. Older existing dams may fail to meet revised safety criteria and structural rehabilitation to meet such criteria may be costly and difficult. Fragility assessment provides a tool for rational safety evaluation of existing facilities and decision-making by using a probabilistic framework to model sources of uncertainty that may impact dam performance. This paper presents a methodology for developing fragilities of concrete gravity dams to assess their performance against seismic hazards. The methodology is illustrated using the Bluestone Dam on the New River in West Virginia, which was designed in the late 1930s. The seismic fragility assessment indicated that sliding along the dam–foundation interface is likely if the dam were to be subjected to an earthquake with a magnitude of the maximum credible earthquake (MCE) specified by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Moreover, there will likely be tensile cracking at the neck of the dam at this level of seismic excitation. However, loss of control of the reservoir is unlikely. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Pierre Léger,et al.  Earthquake input mechanisms for time-domain analysis of dam—foundation systems , 1989 .

[2]  Andy A. Afrouz,et al.  Practical Handbook of Rock Mass Classification Systems and Modes of Ground Failure , 1992 .

[3]  N. Null.  Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures , 2003 .

[4]  J. E. Butler.  The influence of pore pressure upon concrete , 1981 .

[5]  A. Anandarajah,et al.  Elasto-plastic finite element analyses of a soil-structure system under earthquake excitations , 1995 .

[6]  G. R. Darbre.  PHENOMENOLOGICAL TWO-PARAMETER MODEL FOR DYNAMIC DAM-RESERVOIR INTERACTION , 1998 .

[7]  Ronald L. Iman,et al.  Risk methodology for geologic disposal of radioactive waste: small sample sensitivity analysis techniques for computer models, with an application to risk assessment , 1980 .

[8]  C. Allin Cornell,et al.  Earthquakes, Records, and Nonlinear Responses , 1998 .

[9]  M. K. Ravindra,et al.  Seismic fragilities for nuclear power plant risk studies , 1984 .

[10]  Pierre Léger,et al.  Reduced frequency-independent models for seismic analysis of concrete gravity dams , 1992 .

[11]  Donald W. Newton,et al.  Realistic Assessment of Maximum Flood Potentials , 1983 .

[12]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  Earthquake analysis of concrete gravity dams including dam‐water‐foundation rock interaction , 1981 .

[13]  M. D. McKay,et al.  A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code , 2000 .

[14]  A. Ang,et al.  Mechanistic Seismic Damage Model for Reinforced Concrete , 1985 .

[15]  Bruce R. Ellingwood.  Validation studies of seismic PRAs , 1990 .

[16]  Francis C. McMichael,et al.  Safety goals for high‐hazard dams: Are dams too safe? , 1990 .

[17]  Bruce R. Ellingwood,et al.  Fragility Analysis of Concrete Gravity Dams , 2001 .

[18]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  Earthquake-Induced Base Sliding of Concrete Gravity Dams , 1991 .

[19]  John P. Wolf,et al.  Lumped‐parameter model and recursive evaluation of interaction forces of semi‐infinite uniform fluid channel for time‐domain dam‐reservoir analysis , 1992 .