In order to gain understanding of the relationship of life history characteristics to coloniza- tion success, species cohabitation, and species replacement, a known number of seeds (fruits, achenes) of teasel, a "biennial" plant species, Dipsacus sylvestris Huds. were experimentally intro- duced into 52 permanent plots within each of 8 contiguous abandoned fields of various vegetation types in Michigan, USA. The nearest naturally occurring teasel population was 11.2 km from the study site; no teasel seeds or plants were present in the fields except where controlled introductions were made for this study. Permanently marked teasel and control plots were monitored over a 5-yr period for colonization success of teasel, species composition, and species net annual primary production. Results fall into three categories, the first of which has implications for studies of plant strategies and the last 2 have implications for studies of community structure and succession. 1) Life history characteristics of teasel and initial colonization success: A cohort of teasel seeds spreads its germination over more than one growing season; the length of time in the rosette stage may extend to 4 yr or more. Teasel did not successfully colonize the field that had thick quackgrass litter due to low germination of seed and high mortality of seedlings. In other fields, teasel rosettes grew at various mean rates, depending upon the presence of grass, other herbaceous dicots, and shading shrubs. Critical size for flowering was reached in either 2, 3, or 4 yr in six of the eight fields and these populations produced -7x more seeds than was originally introduced. 2) A mechanism for recolonization on a site: A teasel rosette creates an opening in vegetation that is colonized by teasel seedlings, or if teasel seeds are unavailable, by short-lived winter annuals, spe- cially Barbarea vulgaris L. The number of species in a field (excluding teasel) increased with teasel colonization, probably due to the creation of these openings by teasel rosettes. 3) Cohabitation with teasel: Grass growing with teasel was not reduced in productivity (compared to that in Control plots), despite the significant production by teasel. However, the herbaceous di- cotyledonous plants were slowly reduced over 4 yr as teasel increased in biomass. Roots of flowering teasel plants do not occupy the same soil layer as roots of the shallow grasses in this study, but probably do compete with those of the morphologically similar herbaceous dicots. Studies of commu- nity succession have often recorded changes in the number of species and in site productivity; such changes can here be directly attributed to colonization of the sites by a new species.
[1]
Hal Caswell,et al.
Population Growth Rates and Age Versus Stage-Distribution Models for Teasel (Dipsacus Sylvestris Huds.)
,
1977
.
[2]
B. Holt.
Effect of Arrival Time on Recruitment, Mortality, and Reproduction in Successional Plant Populations
,
1972
.
[3]
J. Harper,et al.
Studies in the dynamics of plant populations. 3. The influence of associated species on populations of Rumex acetosa L. and R. acetosella L. in grassland.
,
1970
.
[4]
J. Harper,et al.
Studies in the dynamics of plant populations. 1. The fate of seed and transplants introduced into various habitats.
,
1967
.
[5]
G. Harris.
Some competitive relationships between Agropyron spicatum and Bromus tectorum.
,
1967
.
[6]
F. Golley.
Structure and Function of an Old‐Field Broomsedge Community
,
1965
.
[7]
Hal Caswell,et al.
Transient Behavior and Life History Analysis of Teasel (Dipsacus Sylvestris Huds.)
,
1978
.
[8]
C. Donald,et al.
Competition Among Crop and Pasture Plants
,
1963
.
[9]
G. E. Blackman,et al.
Physiological and Ecological Studies in the Analysis of Plant Environment XII. The Role of the Light Factor in Limiting Growth
,
1959
.
[10]
Brougham Rw.
Interception of light by the foliage of pure and mixed stands of pasture plants
,
1958
.
[11]
E. Salisbury,et al.
The reproductive capacity of plants : studies in quantitative biology
,
1942
.