Mechanical eye model for comparison of optical and physiological imaging properties

Most modern ophthalmic technologies manipulate the optical functionality of the human eye. A simulation of a human eye can be performed by numerical or mechanical eye models and can be verified by in-vivo measurements. The imaging properties of intraocular lenses are important due to the high frequency of cataract surgeries. During this surgery the clouded eye lens is removed and replaced by an artificial intraocular lens. Differnt intraocular lens types exist: mono-, bi- or multifocal refractive lenses and bi- or multifocal microstructured lenses. The implanted lens types have different image properties as well as image qualities. There are different physical quality criteria to evaluate the image quality. Unfortunatly the correlation between most physical quality criteria and the physiological quality of patient's vision is low, especially in the case of multifocal intraocular lenses. Therefore an individual adaptation of intraocular lenses to the patients' vision is necessary. Thus a new mechanical eye model in the size of a human eye which allows the direct comparison of physical and physiological image quality is presented. The image quality can be observed by a test person using a microscope. Between the artificial retina and the microscope a beam splitter is positioned. A camera, placed perpendicular to the optical axis of the microscope, can be used for simultaneous physical image quality measurement. The measurement of quality criteria for different lens shifts and tilts can be made automatically.

[1]  Chris Dainty,et al.  Wide-field schematic eye models with gradient-index lens. , 2007, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[2]  P Artal,et al.  Modulation transfer functions of eyes implanted with intraocular lenses. , 1993, Applied optics.

[3]  Damian Siedlecki,et al.  Schematic eye with a gradient-index lens and aspheric surfaces. , 2004, Optics letters.

[4]  D. Williams,et al.  Monochromatic aberrations of the human eye in a large population. , 2001, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[5]  Mathias Forjan,et al.  Semi-automatic evaluation of intraocular lenses (IOL) using a mechanical eye model , 2013, Photonics West - Biomedical Optics.

[6]  Markus Sticker,et al.  Quantitative performance of bifocal and multifocal intraocular lenses in a model eye: point spread function in multifocal intraocular lenses. , 2002, Archives of ophthalmology.

[7]  M. S. Almeida,et al.  Different schematic eyes and their accuracy to the in vivo eye: a quantitative comparison study , 2007 .

[8]  L W Grossman,et al.  Minimum resolution specification of intraocular lens implantsusing the modulation transfer function. , 1993, Applied optics.

[9]  E. Sarver,et al.  Schematic eye models for simulation of patient visual performance. , 2001, Journal of refractive surgery.

[10]  Wilhelm Stork,et al.  In vitro strehl ratios with spherical, aberration-free, average, and customized spherical aberration-correcting intraocular lenses. , 2009, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[11]  Stefano Bozza,et al.  QUALITY OF VISION WITH THREE DIFFERENT IOLs: A STUDY WITH THE SUPPORT OF AN EXPERIMENTAL EYE MODEL , 2004 .

[12]  Sverker Norrby,et al.  Using the lens haptic plane concept and thick‐lens ray tracing to calculate intraocular lens power , 2004, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[13]  R. Navarro,et al.  Off-axis aberrations of a wide-angle schematic eye model. , 1999, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[14]  Pier Giorgio Gobbi,et al.  Experimental characterization of the imaging properties of multifocal intraocular lenses , 2003, SPIE BiOS.

[15]  J. Timonen,et al.  Compression forces of haptics of selected posterior chamber lenses , 1997, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[16]  N E Norrby Standardized methods for assessing the imaging quality of intraocular lenses. , 1995, Applied optics.

[17]  Phillip Bedggood,et al.  Exploring Ocular Aberrations with a Schematic Human Eye Model , 2008, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[18]  LUIS GONZÁLEZ,et al.  On the Prediction of Optical Aberrations by Personalized Eye Models , 2006, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[19]  J M Miller,et al.  Visual acuity modeling using optical raytracing of schematic eyes. , 1995, American journal of ophthalmology.

[20]  Corina van de Pol,et al.  Normal‐eye Zernike coefficients and root‐mean‐square wavefront errors , 2006, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[21]  Rafael Navarro,et al.  The Optical Design of the Human Eye: a Critical Review , 2009 .

[22]  N A Brennan,et al.  Anatomically accurate, finite model eye for optical modeling. , 1997, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[23]  Patricia Piers,et al.  Model eyes for evaluation of intraocular lenses. , 2007, Applied optics.