Location representation in enclosed spaces: what types of information afford young children an advantage?

It has been suggested that young children can only reorient, locating a target object, when the geometry of an enclosed space provides distinctive shape information [e.g., Hermer, L., & Spelke, E. (1994). A geometric process for spatial reorientation in young children. Nature, 370, 57-59]. Recently, however, young children were shown to specify location in a square-shaped space, where geometry is uninformative, so long as scale-like information was available on the walls of the space [Huttenlocher, J., & Lourenco, S. F. (2007a). Coding location in enclosed spaces: Is geometry the principle? Developmental Science, 10, 741-746]. Here we build on this work by examining more closely what types of cues afford 18- to 24-month-olds an advantage in locating a target object following disorientation. Their performance was assessed when linear scale-like information was presented either in isolation or in composite form. It was found that, even in isolation, young children searched at the appropriate locations, with added benefit when presented as a composite. We suggest that linear scale-like dimensions, especially when available in composite form, play a critical role in supporting location representation in young children.

[1]  E. Spelke,et al.  Infants' Discrimination of Number vs. Continuous Extent , 2002, Cognitive Psychology.

[2]  Individual Differences in Use of Left-Right Visual Cues: A Reexamination of Mirror-Image Confusions in Preschoolers. , 1984 .

[3]  H W HAKE,et al.  Multidimensional stimulus differences and accuracy of discrimination. , 1955, Journal of experimental psychology.

[4]  J. Rieser,et al.  Bayesian integration of spatial information. , 2007, Psychological bulletin.

[5]  M. Blades,et al.  The development of 3- to 6-year-olds' map using ability: the relative importance of landmarks and map alignment. , 1990, The Journal of genetic psychology.

[6]  E. Spelke,et al.  Modularity and development: the case of spatial reorientation , 1996, Cognition.

[7]  Stella F. Lourenco,et al.  Coding location in enclosed spaces: is geometry the principle? , 2007, Developmental science.

[8]  W. R. Garner The Processing of Information and Structure , 1974 .

[9]  L. Hedges,et al.  Categories and particulars: prototype effects in estimating spatial location. , 1991, Psychological review.

[10]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  A developmental analysis of the polar structure of dimensions , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[11]  N. Newcombe,et al.  Is there a geometric module for spatial orientation? squaring theory and evidence , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[12]  Merideth Leigh Gattis,et al.  Spatial schemas and abstract thought , 2001 .

[13]  P. Bauer,et al.  The fabric of an event: Different sources of temporal invariance differentially affect 24-month-olds' recall , 1993 .

[14]  Stella F. Lourenco,et al.  Using Spatial Categories to Reason about Location , 2007 .

[15]  L. Smith,et al.  A model of perceptual classification in children and adults. , 1989, Psychological review.

[16]  Janellen Huttenlocher,et al.  How toddlers represent enclosed spaces , 2003, Cogn. Sci..

[17]  Carl E. Granrud,et al.  Visual perception and cognition in infancy , 1995 .

[18]  Patricia J. Bauer,et al.  Holding it all together: How enabling relations facilitate young children's event recall ☆ , 1992 .

[19]  Almut Hupbach,et al.  Reorientation in a rhombic environment: No evidence for an encapsulated geometric module , 2005 .

[20]  Stella F. Lourenco,et al.  Toddlers' Representations of Space , 2005, Psychological science.

[21]  F. J. Langdon,et al.  The Child's Conception of Space , 1967 .

[22]  M. Corballis,et al.  Why do children confuse mirror-image obliques? , 1977, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[23]  Kelly S. Mix,et al.  Number Versus Contour Length in Infants' Discrimination of Small Visual Sets , 1999 .

[24]  Nora S. Newcombe,et al.  Knowing Where Things Are in the Second Year of Life: Implications for Hippocampal Development , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[25]  Elizabeth S. Spelke,et al.  A geometric process for spatial reorientation in young children , 1994, Nature.

[26]  Marina Vasilyeva,et al.  Children's use of geometric information in mapping tasks. , 2006, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[27]  Neil Burgess,et al.  Children reorient using the left/right sense of coloured landmarks at 18–24 months , 2008, Cognition.

[28]  Lynn Nadel,et al.  Children's Use of Landmarks: Implications for Modularity Theory , 2002, Psychological science.

[29]  Nora S Newcombe,et al.  Why size counts: children's spatial reorientation in large and small enclosures. , 2008, Developmental science.

[30]  Stella F. Lourenco,et al.  Using geometry to specify location: implications for spatial coding in children and nonhuman animals , 2007, Psychological research.

[31]  Philippe Pinel,et al.  Distributed and Overlapping Cerebral Representations of Number, Size, and Luminance during Comparative Judgments , 2004, Neuron.

[32]  Linda B. Smith A model of perceptual classification in children and adults. , 1989 .

[33]  Stella F. Lourenco,et al.  The Representation of Geometric Cues in Infancy. , 2008, Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies.

[34]  Stella F. Lourenco,et al.  How do young children determine location? Evidence from disorientation tasks , 2006, Cognition.

[35]  J. Spencer,et al.  The Emerging Spatial Mind , 2007 .

[36]  J. Huttenlocher,et al.  Toddlers' use of metric information and landmarks to reorient. , 2001, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[37]  Sang Ah Lee,et al.  Reorientation and Landmark-Guided Search by Young Children , 2006, Psychological science.

[38]  A. Antebi,et al.  Long Life A Matter of Taste (and Smell) , 2004, Neuron.

[39]  Elizabeth S. Spelke,et al.  Sources of Flexibility in Human Cognition: Dual-Task Studies of Space and Language , 1999, Cognitive Psychology.