Orbitofrontal lesions impair use of cue-outcome associations in a devaluation task.

The orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) has been implicated in the use of outcome expectancies to guide behavior. The present study used a devaluation task to examine this function. Rats first received light-food pairings followed by food-toxin pairings designed to devalue the food. After either excitotoxic or sham OFC lesions, responding to the light was reassessed. Sham-lesioned rats showed reduced responding to the light relative to behavioral controls, which had received food and toxin unpaired. In contrast, OFC-lesioned rats showed no such reductions. Combined with previous data (C. L. Pickens, M. P. Saddoris, B. Setlow, M. Gallagher, P. C. Holland, & G. Schoenbaum, 2003), these results indicate that the OFC is critical for the maintenance of information about the current incentive value of reinforcers or the use of that information to guide behavior.

[1]  P. Holland.  Conditioned stimulus as a determinant of the form of the Pavlovian conditioned response. , 1977, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[2]  G. Paxinos,et al.  The Rat Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates , 1983 .

[3]  D. Woodruff-Pak,et al.  Eyeblink classical conditioning in H.M.: delay and trace paradigms. , 1993, Behavioral neuroscience.

[4]  A. Damasio,et al.  Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex , 1994, Cognition.

[5]  P. Holland,et al.  Neurotoxic Lesions of Basolateral, But Not Central, Amygdala Interfere with Pavlovian Second-Order Conditioning and Reinforcer Devaluation Effects , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  E. Murray,et al.  Excitotoxic Lesions of the Amygdala Fail to Produce Impairment in Visual Learning for Auditory Secondary Reinforcement But Interfere with Reinforcer Devaluation Effects in Rhesus Monkeys , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  G. Schoenbaum,et al.  Orbitofrontal Cortex and Representation of Incentive Value in Associative Learning , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  Gregory P. Lee,et al.  Different Contributions of the Human Amygdala and Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex to Decision-Making , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[9]  G. Schoenbaum,et al.  Neural Encoding in Orbitofrontal Cortex and Basolateral Amygdala during Olfactory Discrimination Learning , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  E. Murray,et al.  Control of Response Selection by Reinforcer Value Requires Interaction of Amygdala and Orbital Prefrontal Cortex , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[11]  P. Holland.  Trial and intertrial durations in appetitive conditioning in rats , 2000 .

[12]  Ronald F Rogers,et al.  Learning-related interpositus activity is conserved across species as studied during eyeblink conditioning in the rat , 2001, Brain Research.

[13]  J. O'Doherty,et al.  Appetitive and Aversive Olfactory Learning in Humans Studied Using Event-Related Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  G. Schoenbaum,et al.  Encoding Predicted Outcome and Acquired Value in Orbitofrontal Cortex during Cue Sampling Depends upon Input from Basolateral Amygdala , 2003, Neuron.

[15]  J. O'Doherty,et al.  Encoding Predictive Reward Value in Human Amygdala and Orbitofrontal Cortex , 2003, Science.

[16]  B. Balleine,et al.  The Effect of Lesions of the Basolateral Amygdala on Instrumental Conditioning , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  J. Parkinson,et al.  Dissociable Contributions of the Human Amygdala and Orbitofrontal Cortex to Incentive Motivation and Goal Selection , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[18]  Geoffrey Schoenbaum,et al.  Different Roles for Orbitofrontal Cortex and Basolateral Amygdala in a Reinforcer Devaluation Task , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  P. Holland,et al.  Amygdala–frontal interactions and reward expectancy , 2004, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.