Profitability of cryptocurrency Pump and Dump schemes

One of the price manipulation schemes achieved by artificially increasing the trading volume of the target asset, Pump and Dump (P&D) schemes, has a long history in the stock market and is usually considered unlawful. In cryptocurrency markets, however, this scheme has not been well-regulated and uniquely orchestrated through a new type of social media platform such as Telegram. This paper aims to identify the features of P&D organized through Telegram and examine the market resilience to these activities. The regression model will be placed, in a Bayesian hierarchical framework, to clarify variables that contribute to the profitability (i.e., price change) of P&D attempts. It is revealed that the effect of trading volume on profitability significantly differs across each exchange market. Particularly, Yobit and Cryptopia are more sensitive (easily manipulated) to the increase in the trading volume than Binance and Bittrex, while controlling other significant factors, including the timing of the pump (hourly, yearly), the currency, and the Telegram channel. Furthermore, this paper builds a machine learning model to identify the price hike (successful schemes) given information before the pump starts and achieved more than 75% accuracy using tree-based ensemble models. The contribution of this paper is to provide a detailed analysis of P&D schemes using a novel statistical approach, while particularly focusing on the effect of each exchange, therefore provides a better understanding of how the market is manipulated by the crowd of people in social media platforms.

[1]  Tao Li,et al.  Cryptocurrency Pump-and-Dump Schemes , 2019 .

[2]  Eugene F. Soltes,et al.  Who Falls Prey to the Wolf of Wall Street? Investor Participation in Market Manipulation , 2017, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[3]  Richard Rosenfeld,et al.  Commodity Futures Trading Commission issues advisory for virtual currency pump-and-dump schemes , 2018, Journal of Investment Compliance.

[4]  Maurizio Tesconi,et al.  Charting the Landscape of Online Cryptocurrency Manipulation , 2020, IEEE Access.

[5]  Tianqi Chen,et al.  XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System , 2016, KDD.

[6]  David B. Kramer The Way It Is and the Way It Should Be: Liability Under §10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 Thereunder for Making False and Misleading Statements as Part of a Scheme to "Pump and Dump" a Stock , 2005 .

[7]  Fred Morstatter,et al.  Identifying and Analyzing Cryptocurrency Manipulations in Social Media , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems.

[8]  Overconfident Investors, Predictable Returns, and Excessive Trading , 2015 .

[9]  Tyler Moore,et al.  An Examination of the Cryptocurrency Pump and Dump Ecosystem , 2018 .

[10]  J. Kamps,et al.  To the moon: defining and detecting cryptocurrency pump-and-dumps , 2018, Crime Science.

[11]  Tālis J. Putniņš,et al.  A New Wolf in Town? Pump-and-Dump Manipulation in Cryptocurrency Markets , 2020, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[12]  A. Gelman Prior distributions for variance parameters in hierarchical models (comment on article by Browne and Draper) , 2004 .

[13]  D. Rubin,et al.  Inference from Iterative Simulation Using Multiple Sequences , 1992 .

[14]  Neil Gandal,et al.  Price Manipulation in the Bitcoin Ecosystem , 2017 .

[15]  Tanja Hagemann,et al.  Cryptocurrency Pump and Dump Schemes: Quantification and Detection , 2019, 2019 International Conference on Data Mining Workshops (ICDMW).

[16]  Neil Gandal,et al.  An Examination of the Cryptocurrency Pump and Dump Ecosystem , 2018, Inf. Process. Manag..

[17]  Benjamin Livshits,et al.  The Anatomy of a Cryptocurrency Pump-and-Dump Scheme , 2018, USENIX Security Symposium.

[18]  Julinda Stefa,et al.  The Doge of Wall Street: Analysis and Detection of Pump and Dump Cryptocurrency Manipulations , 2021, ArXiv.

[19]  Sebastian Raschka,et al.  Python Machine Learning , 2015 .