A Simple and Effective Intraoperative Technique for Correction of Severe Congenital Breast Asymmetry.

BACKGROUND One severe type of congenital breast asymmetry, with a hypoplastic breast on one side and a hyperplastic breast on the other side, has been recognized in the author's practice. Although breast augmentation, mastopexy, and breast reduction used separately or in combination are the most common procedures performed to correct congenital asymmetrical breasts, an effective approach for the correction of such a congenital breast asymmetry has not been established in the literature. In this article, a simple and effective intraoperative approach is described for correction of severe congenital breast asymmetry. METHOD Breast augmentation with an implant for the hypoplastic side and mastopexy or small breast reduction for the hyperplastic side were performed. Symmetry was achieved intraoperatively by an implant for breast augmentation on the hypoplastic side and mastopexy or small reduction, determined by a tailor-tacking technique, on the hyperplastic side. RESULTS In the past 2 years, a total of 4 patients with severe congenital breast asymmetry was operated on by the author with this established approach. All patients were pleased about their symmetry and cosmetic outcome without any surgical complications. The resulted breast scars are minimal and well tolerated by patients. No revision or subsequent surgery has even been needed during follow-op. CONCLUSION Correction of severe congenital breast asymmetry is not an easy task and can be difficult. This simple and effective intraoperative approach provides a relatively easy and logical way as a 1-stage procedure for this subgroup of patients with symmetrical and cosmetically pleasing outcome.

[1]  A. Kolker,et al.  Tuberous Breast Deformity: Classification and Treatment Strategy for Improving Consistency in Aesthetic Correction , 2015, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[2]  U. Khan Review of implant sizes in 146 consecutive asymmetrical augmentation mammoplasties , 2014, European Journal of Plastic Surgery.

[3]  P. Blondeel,et al.  Composite Breast Augmentation: Soft-Tissue Planning Using Implants and Fat , 2013, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[4]  H. S. Tatlıdede,et al.  Our Surgical Approach to Treatment of Congenital, Developmental, and Acquired Breast Asymmetries: A Review of 30 Cases , 2013, Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.

[5]  U. Khan Breast and chest asymmetries: classification and relative distribution of common asymmetries in patients requesting augmentation mammoplasty , 2011, European Journal of Plastic Surgery.

[6]  P. Cordeiro,et al.  Development of a New Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Breast Surgery: The BREAST-Q , 2009, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[7]  D. Vecchio Breast reconstruction for breast asymmetry using recipient site pre-expansion and autologous fat grafting: a case report. , 2009 .

[8]  P. Gentile,et al.  Breast Asymmetries: A Brief Review and Our Experience , 2006, Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.

[9]  L. Phillips,et al.  The Incidence of Tuberous Breast Deformity in Asymmetric and Symmetric Mammaplasty Patients , 2005, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[10]  G. Maxwell Breast asymmetry. , 2001, Aesthetic surgery journal.

[11]  M. Costagliola,et al.  Breast base anomalies: treatment strategy for tuberous breasts, minor deformities, and asymmetry. , 1999, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[12]  J C Boot,et al.  Congenital breast asymmetry: subjective and objective assessment. , 1994, British journal of plastic surgery.