Investigating Task Coordination in Globally Dispersed Teams: A Structural Contingency Perspective

Task coordination poses significant challenges for globally dispersed teams (GDTs). Although various task coordination mechanisms have been proposed for such teams, there is a lack of systematic examination of the appropriate coordination mechanisms for different teams based on the nature of their task and the context under which they operate. Prior studies on collocated teams suggest matching their levels of task dependence to specific task coordination mechanisms for effective coordination. This research goes beyond the earlier work by also considering additional contextual factors of GDT (i.e., temporal dispersion and time constraints) in deriving their optimal IT-mediated task coordination mechanisms. Adopting the structural contingency theory, we propose optimal IT-mediated task coordination portfolios to fit the different levels of task dependence, temporal dispersion, and perceived time constraint of GDTs. The proposed fit is tested through a survey and profile analysis of 95 globally dispersed software development teams in a large financial organization. We find, as hypothesized, that the extent of fit between the actual IT-mediated task coordination portfolios used by the surveyed teams and their optimal portfolios proposed here is positively related to their task coordination effectiveness that in turn impacts the team's efficiency and effectiveness. The implications for theory and practice are discussed.

[1]  Richard Torkar,et al.  Pitfalls in Remote Team Coordination: Lessons Learned from a Case Study , 2008, PROFES.

[2]  Rajiv Sabherwal,et al.  The evolution of coordination in outsourced software development projects: a comparison of client and vendor perspectives , 2003, Inf. Organ..

[3]  L. James,et al.  Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. , 1984 .

[4]  Audris Mockus,et al.  Shared Mental Models, Familiarity, and Coordination: A Multi-Method Study of Distributed Software Teams , 2002, ICIS.

[5]  Carol Stoak Saunders,et al.  Information Processing View of Organizations: An Exploratory Examination of Fit in the Context of Interorganizational Relationships , 2005, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[6]  D. Straub,et al.  Knowledge Worker Communications and Recipient Availability: Toward a Task Closure Explanation of Media Choice , 1998 .

[7]  Raghvinder S. Sangwan,et al.  Global Software Development Handbook (Auerbach Series on Applied Software Engineering Series) , 2006 .

[8]  Tammy L. Rapp,et al.  Something(s) old and something(s) new: Modeling drivers of global virtual team effectiveness , 2012 .

[9]  John E. Sawyer,et al.  Virtualness and Knowledge in Teams: Managing the Love Triangle of Organizations, Individuals, and Information Technology , 2003, MIS Q..

[10]  James D. Herbsleb,et al.  Familiarity, Complexity, and Team Performance in Geographically Distributed Software Development , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[11]  L. Sproull,et al.  Coordinating Expertise in Software Development Teams , 2000 .

[12]  J. Alberto Espinosa,et al.  The impact of time separation on coordination in global software teams: a conceptual foundation , 2003, Softw. Process. Improv. Pract..

[13]  J. Pennings Structural Contingency Theory , 2013 .

[14]  Paul S. Adler,et al.  Interdepartmental Interdependence and Coordination: The Case of the Design/Manufacturing Interface , 1995 .

[15]  Elizabeth J. Davidson,et al.  Studying teamwork in global IT support , 2003, 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the.

[16]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  Coordination and Collective Mind in Software Requirements Development , 1998, IBM Syst. J..

[17]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Understanding Antecedents to Conflict in Geographically Distributed Research and Development Teams , 2002, ICIS.

[18]  James D. Herbsleb,et al.  Configuring global software teams: a multi-company analysis of project productivity, quality, and profits , 2011, 2011 33rd International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE).

[19]  Tom Butler,et al.  Coordinating Global Virtual Teams: Building Theory from a Case Study of Software Development , 2010, CAiSE.

[20]  Xiang Li,et al.  Software Development Methodologies, Trends and Implications: A Testing Centric View , 2010 .

[21]  Kuldeep Kumar,et al.  Sustainable Collaboration: Managing Conflict and Cooperation in Interorganizational Systems , 1996, MIS Q..

[22]  James D. Herbsleb,et al.  Architectures, coordination, and distance: Conway’s law and beyond , 1999 .

[23]  Rafael Prikladnicki,et al.  Global software development in practice lessons learned , 2003, Softw. Process. Improv. Pract..

[24]  Noshir Contractor,et al.  New media and organizing at the group level , 2002 .

[25]  Chei Sian Lee,et al.  Exploring the Relationship Between Communication Risk Perception and Communication Portfolio , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[26]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Determinants of Coordination Modes within Organizations , 1976 .

[27]  Anne P. Massey,et al.  Because Time Matters: Temporal Coordination in Global Virtual Project Teams , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[28]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  The interdisciplinary study of coordination , 1994, CSUR.

[29]  Ann Majchrzak,et al.  How virtual teams use their virtual workspace to coordinate knowledge , 2012, TMIS.

[30]  M. Maznevski,et al.  Bridging Space Over Time: Global Virtual Team Dynamics and Effectiveness , 2000 .

[31]  France Bélanger,et al.  Communication Media Repertoires: Dealing with the Multiplicity of Media Choices , 2007, MIS Q..

[32]  Gina J. Medsker,et al.  RELATIONS BETWEEN WORK GROUP CHARACTERISTICS AND EFFECTIVENESS: IMPLICATIONS FOR DESIGNING EFFECTIVE WORK GROUPS , 1993 .

[33]  Michael L. Tushman,et al.  Information Processing as an Integrating Concept in Organizational Design. , 1978 .

[34]  Hans-Georg Gemünden,et al.  Interteam Coordination, Project Commitment, and Teamwork in Multiteam R&D Projects: A Longitudinal Study , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[35]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  Coordination and Success in Multidisciplinary Scientific Collaborations , 2003, ICIS.

[36]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Structures that work: social structure, work structure and coordination ease in geographically distributed teams , 2006, CSCW '06.

[37]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  A Contingency Approach to Software Project Coordination , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[38]  G. M. Wittenbaum,et al.  Coordination in Task-Performing Groups , 2002 .

[39]  Rolph E. Anderson,et al.  Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed. , 2009 .

[40]  J. Alberto Espinosa,et al.  Coordination and Performance in Global Software Service Delivery: The Vendor's Perspective , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[41]  Gerben S. van der Vegt,et al.  Intragroup interdependence and effectiveness: Review and proposed directions for theory and practice , 2002 .

[42]  Raghvinder S. Sangwan,et al.  Global software development handbook , 2006 .

[43]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  A collaborative project management architecture , 2003, 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the.

[44]  Daniela E. Damian,et al.  Global Software Development and Delay: Does Distance Still Matter? , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Global Software Engineering.

[45]  Anne P. Massey,et al.  Collaborative Virtual Environments : Exploring the Link between Collaborative Behaviors and Team Performance , 2011 .

[46]  A. Grandori An Organizational Assessment of Interfirm Coordination Modes , 1997 .

[47]  Atreyi Kankanhalli,et al.  Deriving IT-Mediated Task Coordination Portfolios for Global Virtual Teams , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[48]  Christopher G. Gresov Exploring fit and misfit with multiple contingencies. , 1989 .

[49]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  The Spatial, Temporal, and Configurational Characteristics of Geographic Dispersion in Teams , 2007, MIS Q..

[50]  J. C. Henderson,et al.  Managing I/S Design Teams: A Control Theories Perspective , 1992 .

[51]  Yulin Fang,et al.  Following the Sun: Temporal Dispersion and Performance in Open Source Software Project Teams , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[52]  Wai Fong Boh,et al.  Expertise and Collaboration in the Geographically Dispersed Organization , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[53]  Robert Drazin,et al.  Equifinality: Functional Equivalence in Organization Design , 1997 .

[54]  Youngjin Yoo,et al.  The Impact of Knowledge Coordination on Virtual Team Performance Over Time , 2007, MIS Q..

[55]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Coordination in software development , 1995, CACM.

[56]  J. Alberto Espinosa,et al.  Crossing Spatial and Temporal Boundaries in Globally Distributed Projects: A Relational Model of Coordination Delay , 2009, Inf. Syst. Res..

[57]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  An Investigation of Media Selection Among Directors and Managers: From "Self" to "Other" Orientation , 1998, MIS Q..

[58]  Martha Haywood,et al.  Managing virtual teams : practical techniques for high-technology project managers , 1998 .

[59]  H. Ernst,et al.  How to manage virtual teams , 2009 .

[60]  J. Hair Multivariate data analysis , 1972 .

[61]  Sarma R. Nidumolu The Effect of Coordination and Uncertainty on Software Project Performance: Residual Performance Risk as an Intervening Variable , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[62]  Benjamin Van Roy,et al.  Solving Data Mining Problems Through Pattern Recognition , 1997 .

[63]  James D. Herbsleb,et al.  Identification of coordination requirements: implications for the Design of collaboration and awareness tools , 2006, CSCW '06.

[64]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance , 1995, MIS Q..

[65]  Audris Mockus,et al.  An Empirical Study of Speed and Communication in Globally Distributed Software Development , 2003, IEEE Trans. Software Eng..

[66]  C. Gibson,et al.  Virtual teams that work : creating conditions for virtual team effectiveness , 2003 .

[67]  William H. Glick,et al.  Fit, Equifinality, and Organizational Effectiveness: A Test of Two Configurational Theories , 1993 .

[68]  J. Nunnally Psychometric Theory (2nd ed), New York: McGraw-Hill. , 1978 .

[69]  J. Alberto Espinosa,et al.  Time Separation, Coordination, and Performance in Technical Teams , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[70]  Gary Garrison,et al.  Research Note - A Model of Conflict, Leadership, and Performance in Virtual Teams , 2008, Inf. Syst. Res..

[71]  Peter J. Denning,et al.  Orchestrating coordination in pluralistic networks , 2010, CACM.

[72]  M. F. Luce,et al.  When time is money : Decision behavior under opportunity-cost time pressure , 1996 .

[73]  Anne P. Massey,et al.  Getting It Together: Temporal Coordination and Conflict Management in Global Virtual Teams , 2001 .

[74]  Marcelo Cataldo,et al.  Sources of errors in distributed development projects: implications for collaborative tools , 2010, CSCW '10.

[75]  James D. Herbsleb,et al.  On Coordination Mechanisms in Global Software Development , 2007, International Conference on Global Software Engineering (ICGSE 2007).

[76]  James D. Thompson Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory , 1967 .

[77]  Jody Hoffer Gittell,et al.  Coordinating Mechanisms in Care Provider Groups: Relational Coordination as a Mediator and Input Uncertainty as a Moderator of Performance Effects , 2002 .

[78]  James D. Herbsleb,et al.  Team Knowledge and Coordination in Geographically Distributed Software Development , 2007, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[79]  Xiang Li,et al.  Software Development Methodologies, Trends, and Implications , 2010 .

[80]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Alternative forms of fit in contingency theory. , 1985 .

[81]  Lee Roy Beach,et al.  The Effects of Time Constraints on the Prechoice Screening of Decision Options , 1996 .

[82]  Lawrence B. Mohr,et al.  Organizational Technology and Organizational Structure. , 1971 .

[83]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  The Concept of Fit in Contingency Theory. , 1984 .