Green , circular , bio economy

Despite their evidently different assumptions and operationalization strategies, the concepts of Circular Economy, Green Economy and Bioeconomy are joined by the common ideal to reconcile economic, environmental and social goals. The three concepts are currentlymainstreamed in academiaandpolicymaking as key sustainability avenues, but a comparative analysis of such concepts is missing. The aim of this article is thus to comprehensively analyse the diversitywithin andbetween such concepts. The results are drawn from a bibliometric review of almost two thousand scientific articles published within the last three decades, coupled with a conceptual analysis. We find that, for what concerns environmental sustainability, Green Economy acts as an ‘umbrella’ concept, including elements fromCircular Economyand Bioeconomy concepts (e.g. eco-efficiency; renewables), aswell as additional ideas, e.g. nature-based solutions. Inparticular, Circular Economy and Bioeconomy are resource-focused, whereas in principle Green Economy acknowledges the underpinning role of all ecological processes. Regarding the social dimension, Green Economy is more inclusive of some aspects at local level (e.g. eco-tourism, education), while there is an emerging discussion in Bioeconomy literature around local processes in terms of biosecurity and rural policies. When considering weak/strong sustainability visions, all concepts remain limited in questioning economic growth. By comparing the different sustainability strategies promoted by these concepts we do not advocate for their substitutability, but for their clarification and reciprocal integration. The findings are discussed in light of the concepts' synergies and limits, with the purpose to inform research and policy implementation. © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

[1]  Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen,et al.  Energy and Economic Myths: Institutional and Analytical Economic Essays , 1981 .

[2]  E. Barbier The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development , 1987, Environmental Conservation.

[3]  E. Barbier,et al.  Blueprint for a green economy , 1989 .

[4]  T. Gladwin,et al.  Beyond eco-efficiency: Towards socially sustainable business , 1995 .

[5]  G. Munda Environmental Economics, Ecological Economics, and the Concept of Sustainable Development , 1997, Environmental Values.

[6]  P. Donnelly,et al.  Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. , 2000, Genetics.

[7]  W. Young,et al.  Can businesses move beyond efficiency? The shift toward effectiveness and equity in the corporate sustainability debate , 2006 .

[8]  T. Seager,et al.  Beyond eco-efficiency: A resilience perspective , 2008 .

[9]  J. M. Alier Socially sustainable economic de-growth. , 2009 .

[10]  D. Sculli,et al.  Strategies for Manufacturing in Southern China , 2009, Journal of International Technology and Information Management.

[11]  E. Neumayer Weak Versus Strong Sustainability: Exploring The Limits Of Two Opposing Paradigms , 2010 .

[12]  H. Pülzl,et al.  Discourses, actors and instruments in international forest governance , 2010 .

[13]  L. Levidow,et al.  Sustainable Capital? The Neoliberalization of Nature and Knowledge in the European “Knowledge-based Bio-economy” , 2010 .

[14]  Kurt Hornik,et al.  topicmodels : An R Package for Fitting Topic Models , 2016 .

[15]  L. Kitchen,et al.  Constructing sustainable communities: a theoretical exploration of the bio-economy and eco-economy paradigms , 2011 .

[16]  N. Dempsey,et al.  The social dimension of sustainable development: Defining urban social sustainability , 2011 .

[17]  F. Boons,et al.  The dynamics of industrial symbiosis: A proposal for a conceptual framework based upon a comprehensive literature review , 2011 .

[18]  A. Sheppard,et al.  Biosecurity and sustainability within the growing global bioeconomy , 2011 .

[19]  J. Blignaut,et al.  NATURE AND ITS ROLE IN THE TRANSITION TO A GREEN ECONOMY , 2012 .

[20]  B. Truffer,et al.  Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects , 2012 .

[21]  E. Barbier The Green Economy Post Rio+20 , 2012, Science.

[22]  Jeffrey Heer,et al.  Interpretation and trust: designing model-driven visualizations for text analysis , 2012, CHI.

[23]  R. Garud,et al.  Metatheoretical Perspectives on Sustainability Journeys: Evolutionary, Relational and Durational , 2012 .

[24]  B. Moldan,et al.  How to understand and measure environmental sustainability: Indicators and targets , 2012 .

[25]  PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS Innovating for Sustainable Growth: A Bioeconomy for Europe , 2012 .

[26]  D. Fuchs,et al.  Strong sustainable consumption governance – precondition for a degrowth path? , 2013 .

[27]  D. Eaton Technology and Innovation for a Green Economy , 2013 .

[28]  J. Philp,et al.  Bioremediation, an environmental remediation technology for the bioeconomy. , 2013, Trends in biotechnology.

[29]  Kes McCormick,et al.  The Bioeconomy in Europe: An Overview , 2013 .

[30]  I. Turok,et al.  The Green Economy: Incremental Change or Transformation? , 2013 .

[31]  Kenneth E. Shirley,et al.  LDAvis: A method for visualizing and interpreting topics , 2014 .

[32]  A.J.M. Smits,et al.  Visions of Sustainability in Bioeconomy Research , 2014 .

[33]  I. Altman,et al.  Rural development opportunities in the bioeconomy. , 2014 .

[34]  B. Thorsen,et al.  Shades of green: a social scientific view on bioeconomy in the forest sector , 2014 .

[35]  D. Pettenella,et al.  A new principle of the European Union forest policy: the cascading use of wood products. , 2014 .

[36]  M. Ollikainen Forestry in bioeconomy – smart green growth for the humankind , 2014 .

[37]  Jouni Ikonen,et al.  Cloud-based bibliometric analysis service for systematic mapping studies , 2015, CompSysTech '15.

[38]  B. Lasserre,et al.  Natural capital and bioeconomy: challenges and opportunities for forestry , 2015 .

[39]  S. Franceschini,et al.  Beyond unsustainable eco-innovation: The role of narratives in the evolution of the lighting sector , 2015 .

[40]  Murzintcev Nikita Tuning of the LDA Models Parameters , 2015 .

[41]  Alberto Bezama,et al.  Let us discuss how cascading can help implement the circular economy and the bio-economy strategies , 2016, Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA.

[42]  N. Martins Ecosystems, strong sustainability and the classical circular economy , 2016 .

[43]  S. Franceschini,et al.  Unveiling scientific communities about sustainability and innovation. A bibliometric journey around sustainable terms , 2016 .

[44]  P. Kuikman,et al.  Green economy and related concepts: An overview , 2016 .

[45]  Markus M. Bugge,et al.  What Is the Bioeconomy? A Review of the Literature , 2016 .

[46]  Karoline S. Rogge,et al.  Policy mixes for sustainability transitions: An extended concept and framework for analysis , 2016 .

[47]  Alexandra Purkus,et al.  Possible Futures towards a Wood-Based Bioeconomy: A Scenario Analysis for Germany , 2016 .

[48]  A. Székács Environmental and Ecological Aspects in the Overall Assessment of Bioeconomy , 2017 .

[49]  N. Droste,et al.  The Green Economy: Pragmatism or Revolution? Perceptions of Young Researchers on Social Ecological Transformation , 2017 .

[50]  Keith R. Skene,et al.  The Circular Economy: An Interdisciplinary Exploration of the Concept and Application in a Global Context , 2015, Journal of Business Ethics.

[51]  Alexandru Giurca,et al.  Forests in a bioeconomy: bridge, boundary or divide? , 2017 .

[52]  J. Goodell,et al.  POSSIBLE FUTURES: , 2017, The Canine-Campus Connection.

[53]  Гнедіна Катерина Володимирівна THE SOCIAL DIMENSION OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF UKRAINE , 2017 .

[54]  O. Frör,et al.  Pathways to Shape the Bioeconomy , 2017 .

[55]  R. Hajjar,et al.  The problematic old roots of the new green economy narrative: how far can it take us in re-imagining sustainability in forestry? , 2017 .

[56]  C. Lauk,et al.  A Transition to Which Bioeconomy? An Exploration of Diverging Techno-Political Choices , 2017 .

[57]  Itsik Pe'er,et al.  Inference of Population Structure from Ancient DNA , 2018, RECOMB.

[58]  이주연,et al.  Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) 모델 기반의 인공지능(A.I.) 기술 관련 연구 활동 및 동향 분석 , 2018 .