Developments in active noise control sound systems for magnetic resonance imaging

Abstract Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanners can produce noise measuring over 130 dB SPL. This noise stimulates the auditory nervous system, limiting the dynamic range for stimulus driven activity in functional MRI (fMRI) experiments and can influence other brain functions. Even for structural scans it causes subject anxiety and discomfort in addition to the impediment to communications. Here we describe the realization and validation of a sound system for sound presentation inside an MRI scanner and the modifications to a standard active noise control technique for use in the noisy and compact environment of the scanner. This paper provides a review of the technology available for the presentation of audio stimuli in an MRI environment and the modifications required for the active control of scanner noise. Some of the content has been previously published [Chambers J, Akeroyd MA, Summerfield AQ, Palmer AR. Active control of the volume acquisition noise in functional magnetic resonance imaging: method and psychoacoustical evaluation. J Acoust Soc Am 2001;110(6):3041–54; Levitt H. Transformed up–down methods in psychoacoustics. J Acoust Soc Am 1971;49:467–77], but this paper goes further in describing the stages of development as the system performance was optimised. The performance of the system and both the objective and subjective reduction of the scanner noise are reported. Finally, we discuss recent improvements to the system that are currently being evaluated and describe the theory of opto-acoustical transducers that operate on the principle of light modulation. These are immune from, and do not create, electro-magnetic interference (EMI) and radio-frequency interference (RFI).

[1]  S. Kosslyn,et al.  Impact of fMRI Acoustic Noise on the Functional Anatomy of Visual Mental Imagery , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[2]  Yuvi Kahana,et al.  Recent advances in optical microphone technology , 2003 .

[3]  H. Levitt Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  W. T. Peake,et al.  Experiments in Hearing , 1963 .

[5]  A R Palmer,et al.  Sound‐Level Measurements and Calculations of Safe Noise Dosage During EPI at 3 T , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[6]  T. Loenneker,et al.  Silent BOLD imaging , 2001, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[7]  Alexander Kots,et al.  Fiber optic microphone for harsh environment , 1999, Optics East.

[8]  Adriaan Moelker,et al.  Acoustic noise concerns in functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2003, Human brain mapping.

[9]  Bernard Widrow,et al.  Adaptive Signal Processing , 1985 .

[10]  Wolfgang Grodd,et al.  Mismatch responses to randomized gradient switching noise as reflected by fMRI and whole‐head magnetoencephalography , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[11]  Alexander Kots,et al.  Optical Microphone's Breakthrough , 1999 .

[12]  E H Berger,et al.  Methods of measuring the attenuation of hearing protection devices. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  Bernard Widrow,et al.  Adaptive switching circuits , 1988 .

[14]  A R Palmer,et al.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging measurements of sound-level encoding in the absence of background scanner noise. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  Risto Näätänen,et al.  Effects of Acoustic Gradient Noise from Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging on Auditory Processing as Reflected by Event-Related Brain Potentials , 2001, NeuroImage.

[16]  Steve C R Williams,et al.  Acoustic noise and functional magnetic resonance imaging: Current strategies and future prospects , 2002, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[17]  William F Christensen,et al.  Evaluation of auditory cortex activation by using silent FMRI. , 2003, American journal of otolaryngology.

[18]  E. H. Berger,et al.  Laboratory Attenuation of Earmuffs and Earplugs Both Singly and in Combination , 1983 .

[19]  Alexander Kots,et al.  Fiber optic distance sensor with subangstrom resolution , 1999, Optics East.

[20]  T. SOMERVILLE,et al.  Applied Acoustics , 1958, Nature.

[21]  Klaus Scheffler,et al.  Functional Fields in Human Auditory Cortex Revealed by Time-Resolved fMRI without Interference of EPI Noise , 2001, NeuroImage.

[22]  Gaurav Sharma,et al.  Influence of Resolution on Scanner Noise Perceptibility , 2001, PICS.

[23]  G. Békésy,et al.  Experiments in Hearing , 1963 .

[24]  Nykolai Bilaniuk,et al.  Optical microphone transduction techniques , 1997 .

[25]  Dan Gauger,et al.  Hearing protection: surpassing the limits to attenuation imposed by the bone-conduction pathways. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  A R Palmer,et al.  Active control of the volume acquisition noise in functional magnetic resonance imaging: method and psychoacoustical evaluation. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  Philip A. Nelson,et al.  Active Control of Sound , 1992 .

[28]  A R Thornton Maximum length sequences and Volterra series in the analysis of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions. , 1997, British journal of audiology.

[29]  J. Melcher,et al.  Isolating the auditory system from acoustic noise during functional magnetic resonance imaging: examination of noise conduction through the ear canal, head, and body. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  Carrie J. Scarff,et al.  The effect of MR scanner noise on auditory cortex activity using fMRI , 2004, Human brain mapping.

[31]  R. Bowtell,et al.  “sparse” temporal sampling in auditory fMRI , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[32]  Y Yang,et al.  A silent event‐related functional MRI technique for brain activation studies without interference of scanner acoustic noise , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.