Thinking outside of the box II: Disrupting the cognitive map

A number of influential spatial learning theories posit that organisms encode a viewpoint independent (i.e. allocentric) representation of the global boundary shape of their environment in order to support spatial reorientation and place learning. In contrast to the trial and error learning mechanisms that support domain-general processes, a representation of the global-shape of the environment is thought to be encoded automatically as part of a cognitive map, and without interference from other spatial cues. To date, however, this core theoretical assumption has not been appropriately examined. This is because previous attempts to address this question have failed to employ tasks that fully dissociate reorientation based on an allocentric representation of global-shape from egocentric reorientation strategies. Here, we address this issue in two experiments. Participants were trained to navigate to a hidden goal on one side of a virtual arena (e.g. the inside) before being required to find the same point on the alternative side (e.g. the outside). At test, performing the correct search behaviour requires an allocentric representation of the global boundary-shape. Using established associative learning procedures of overshadowing and blocking, we find that search behaviour at test is disrupted when participants were able to form landmark-goal associations during training. These results demonstrate that encoding of an allocentric representation of boundary information is susceptible to interference from landmark cues, and is not acquired through special means. Instead, the results suggest that allocentric representations of environmental boundaries are acquired through the same kind of error-correction mechanisms that support domain-general non-spatial learning.

[1]  G. Vallortigara,et al.  From natural geometry to spatial cognition , 2012, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[2]  C. Gallistel,et al.  The neuroscience of learning: beyond the Hebbian synapse. , 2013, Annual review of psychology.

[3]  Peter M. Jones,et al.  Potentiation, overshadowing, and blocking of spatial learning based on the shape of the environment. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[4]  J. O’Keefe,et al.  Geometric determinants of the place fields of hippocampal neurons , 1996, Nature.

[5]  Laurie L Bloomfield,et al.  Spatial encoding in mountain chickadees: features overshadow geometry , 2005, Biology Letters.

[6]  Joseph M. Austen,et al.  Transfer of spatial search between environments in human adults and young children (Homo sapiens): implications for representation of local geometry by spatial systems. , 2014, Developmental psychobiology.

[7]  J. Pearce,et al.  Absence of Overshadowing and Blocking between Landmarks and the Geometric Cues Provided by the Shape of a Test Arena , 2003, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology.

[8]  R. Rescorla A theory of pavlovian conditioning: The effectiveness of reinforcement and non-reinforcement , 1972 .

[9]  N. Burgess,et al.  Spatial memory: how egocentric and allocentric combine , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[10]  Ranxiao Frances Wang,et al.  Mechanisms of reorientation and object localization by children: A comparison with rats , 1999 .

[11]  J. Pearce,et al.  Theories of associative learning in animals. , 2001, Annual review of psychology.

[12]  E. Spelke,et al.  Human Spatial Representation: Insights from Animals , 2002 .

[13]  T. Regier,et al.  An adaptive cue combination model of human spatial reorientation , 2017, Cognition.

[14]  Thomas J. Wills,et al.  Long-term plasticity in hippocampal place-cell representation of environmental geometry , 2002, Nature.

[15]  N. Burgess,et al.  The Cognitive Architecture of Spatial Navigation: Hippocampal and Striatal Contributions , 2015, Neuron.

[16]  N. Burgess Spatial Cognition and the Brain , 2008, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[17]  Peter M. Jones,et al.  Transfer of spatial behavior between different environments: implications for theories of spatial learning and for the role of the hippocampus in spatial learning. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[18]  Nora S. Newcombe,et al.  Five Reasons to Doubt the Existence of a Geometric Module , 2010, Cogn. Sci..

[19]  Peter M. Jones,et al.  Further evidence that rats rely on local rather than global spatial information to locate a hidden goal: reply to Cheng and Gallistel (2005). , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[20]  J. H. Steiger,et al.  Beyond the F test: Effect size confidence intervals and tests of close fit in the analysis of variance and contrast analysis. , 2004, Psychological methods.

[21]  E S Spelke,et al.  Mechanisms of reorientation and object localization by children: a comparison with rats. , 1999, Behavioral neuroscience.

[22]  Tom Beesley,et al.  When goals conflict with values: counterproductive attentional and oculomotor capture by reward-related stimuli. , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[23]  Nora S Newcombe,et al.  Reorienting When Cues Conflict , 2008, Psychological science.

[24]  Christian F. Doeller,et al.  Parallel striatal and hippocampal systems for landmarks and boundaries in spatial memory , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  Mark Haselgrove,et al.  Learned predictiveness training modulates biases towards using boundary or landmark cues during navigation , 2014, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[26]  Matthew G. Buckley,et al.  Shape Shifting: Local Landmarks Interfere With Navigation by, and Recognition of, Global Shape , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[27]  Yutaka Kosaki,et al.  Overshadowing of geometry learning by discrete landmarks in the water maze: effects of relative salience and relative validity of competing cues. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[28]  M. Moser,et al.  Representation of Geometric Borders in the Entorhinal Cortex , 2008, Science.

[29]  M. Gluck,et al.  Interactive memory systems in the human brain , 2001, Nature.

[30]  Joseph M. Austen,et al.  Within-compound associations explain potentiation and failure to overshadow learning based on geometry by discrete landmarks. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[31]  J. Pearce,et al.  Failure of a landmark to restrict spatial learning based on the shape of the environment , 2004, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology.

[32]  Joseph M. Austen,et al.  Dorsolateral striatal lesions impair navigation based on landmark-goal vectors but facilitate spatial learning based on a “cognitive map” , 2015, Learning & memory.

[33]  N. Mackintosh A Theory of Attention: Variations in the Associability of Stimuli with Reinforcement , 1975 .

[34]  J. O'Keefe,et al.  The hippocampus as a spatial map. Preliminary evidence from unit activity in the freely-moving rat. , 1971, Brain research.

[35]  E. Fischer Conditioned Reflexes , 1942, American journal of physical medicine.

[36]  Stella F. Lourenco,et al.  Toddlers' Representations of Space , 2005, Psychological science.

[37]  N. Mackintosh,et al.  Intradimensional and extradimensional shifts in spatial learning. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[38]  Matthew G. Buckley,et al.  Blocking Spatial Navigation Across Environments That Have a Different Shape , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal learning and cognition.

[39]  Sang Ah Lee,et al.  Core systems of geometry in animal minds , 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[40]  Sara J Shettleworth,et al.  The geometric module in the rat: independence of shape and feature learning in a food finding task , 2004, Learning & behavior.

[41]  N. Newcombe,et al.  Is there a geometric module for spatial orientation? squaring theory and evidence , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[42]  Morgan D. Barense,et al.  Boundaries Shape Cognitive Representations of Spaces and Events , 2018, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[43]  C. Gallistel The organization of learning , 1990 .

[44]  C R Gallistel,et al.  Shape parameters explain data from spatial transformations: comment on Pearce et al. (2004) and Tommasi & Polli (2004). , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[45]  E. Redhead,et al.  Evidence of blocking with geometric cues in a virtual watermaze , 2009 .

[46]  R. F. Wang,et al.  Comparative approaches to human navigation , 2003 .

[47]  R. Poldrack,et al.  Competition among multiple memory systems: converging evidence from animal and human brain studies , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[48]  J. Pearce,et al.  A landmark blocks searching for a hidden platform in an environment with a distinctive shape after extended pretraining , 2009, Learning & behavior.

[49]  S. Shettleworth,et al.  Associative models of instrumental learning: a response to Dupuis and Dawson. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[50]  R. Passingham The hippocampus as a cognitive map J. O'Keefe & L. Nadel, Oxford University Press, Oxford (1978). 570 pp., £25.00 , 1979, Neuroscience.

[51]  Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al.  Modularity as a fish (Xenotoca eiseni) views it: conjoining geometric and nongeometric information for spatial reorientation. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[52]  K. Cheng A purely geometric module in the rat's spatial representation , 1986, Cognition.

[53]  S. Shettleworth,et al.  Learning about Environmental Geometry: an Associative Model , 2022 .

[54]  T. McNamara,et al.  Where you are affects what you can easily imagine: Environmental geometry elicits sensorimotor interference in remote perspective taking , 2017, Cognition.

[55]  J. Pearce,et al.  A model for Pavlovian learning: Variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli. , 1980 .

[56]  Matthew G. Buckley,et al.  Crossing Boundaries: Global Reorientation Following Transfer From the Inside to the Outside of an Arena , 2019, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal learning and cognition.

[57]  A. Lew Looking beyond the boundaries: time to put landmarks back on the cognitive map? , 2011, Psychological bulletin.

[58]  E. Spelke,et al.  Modularity and development: the case of spatial reorientation , 1996, Cognition.

[59]  Elizabeth S. Spelke,et al.  A geometric process for spatial reorientation in young children , 1994, Nature.

[60]  Bradley R. Sturz,et al.  Neither by global nor local cues alone: evidence for a unified orientation process , 2011, Animal Cognition.

[61]  M. Cole,et al.  Potentiation and overshadowing of shape by wall color in a kite-shaped maze using rats in a foraging task , 2011 .

[62]  Craig K. Allison,et al.  Overshadowing of geometric cues by a beacon in a spatial navigation task , 2013, Learning & behavior.

[63]  Guillem R. Esber,et al.  Reconciling the influence of predictiveness and uncertainty on stimulus salience: a model of attention in associative learning , 2011, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[64]  Tobias Meilinger,et al.  Putting Egocentric and Allocentric into Perspective , 2010, Spatial Cognition.

[65]  C. Gallistel,et al.  Heading in the rat: Determination by environmental shape , 1988 .

[66]  J. Pearce,et al.  The 36th Sir Frederick Bartlett Lecture: An associative analysis of spatial learning , 2009, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[67]  Debbie M. Kelly,et al.  Pigeons' (Columba livia) encoding of geometric and featural properties of a spatial environment. , 1998 .

[68]  Hasan Ayaz,et al.  Maze Suite 1.0: A complete set of tools to prepare, present, and analyze navigational and spatial cognitive neuroscience experiments , 2008, Behavior research methods.

[69]  Sara J Shettleworth,et al.  An associative model of geometry learning: a modified choice rule. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[70]  J. O’Keefe,et al.  Boundary Vector Cells in the Subiculum of the Hippocampal Formation , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[71]  E. Redhead,et al.  Interaction between locale and taxon strategies in human spatial learning , 2007 .

[72]  J. Pearce,et al.  Between-cue associations influence searching for a hidden goal in an environment with a distinctive shape. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[73]  M. Pelley The Role of Associative History in Models of Associative Learning: A Selective Review and a Hybrid Model: , 2004 .

[74]  Stella F. Lourenco,et al.  Using geometry to specify location: implications for spatial coding in children and nonhuman animals , 2007, Psychological research.

[75]  Neil Burgess,et al.  A neural-level model of spatial memory and imagery , 2018, eLife.

[76]  M Zanforlin,et al.  Geometric modules in animals' spatial representations: a test with chicks (Gallus gallus domesticus). , 1990, Journal of comparative psychology.

[77]  J. O’Keefe,et al.  Space in the brain: how the hippocampal formation supports spatial cognition , 2014, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[78]  Paul N Wilson,et al.  Enclosure shape influences cue competition effects and goal location learning , 2010, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[79]  M. L. Le Pelley,et al.  Overt attention and predictiveness in human contingency learning. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[80]  J. Pearce,et al.  Spatial Learning Based on Boundaries in Rats Is Hippocampus-Dependent and Prone to Overshadowing , 2010, Behavioral neuroscience.

[81]  Pete R. Jones,et al.  Development of Cue Integration in Human Navigation , 2008, Current Biology.

[82]  L. Hermer-Vazquez,et al.  Language, space, and the development of cognitive flexibility in humans: the case of two spatial memory tasks , 2001, Cognition.

[83]  J. Rieser,et al.  Bayesian integration of spatial information. , 2007, Psychological bulletin.

[84]  Charlotte N. Boccara,et al.  Grid cells in pre- and parasubiculum , 2010, Nature Neuroscience.

[85]  Daniel Kernell,et al.  Long-term plasticity , 2006 .

[86]  M. Schachner,et al.  Adult but not aged C57BL/6 male mice are capable of using geometry for orientation. , 2006, Learning & memory.

[87]  T. Hartley,et al.  The Neurobiology of Mammalian Navigation , 2018, Current Biology.

[88]  Juan Pedro Vargas,et al.  Encoding of geometric and featural spatial information by goldfish (Carassius auratus). , 2004, Journal of comparative psychology.

[89]  Neil Burgess,et al.  Distinct error-correcting and incidental learning of location relative to landmarks and boundaries , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[90]  P. Wilson,et al.  Blocking of spatial learning between enclosure geometry and a local landmark. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[91]  J Ward-Robinson,et al.  Influence of a beacon on spatial learning based on the shape of the test environment. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[92]  L. Nadel,et al.  The Hippocampus as a Cognitive Map , 1978 .

[93]  Mark Haselgrove,et al.  Thinking outside of the box: Transfer of shape-based reorientation across the boundary of an arena , 2016, Cognitive Psychology.

[94]  K. Jeffery,et al.  The Boundary Vector Cell Model of Place Cell Firing and Spatial Memory , 2006, Reviews in the neurosciences.

[95]  M. A. MacIver,et al.  Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias , 2017, Neuron.

[96]  Guillem R. Esber,et al.  Absence of overshadowing between a landmark and geometric cues in a distinctively shaped environment: a test of Miller and Shettleworth (2007). , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[97]  K. Jeffery,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article the Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Theoretical Accounts of Spatial Learning: a Neurobiological View(commentary on Pearce, 2009) , 2022 .

[98]  J. Pearce,et al.  Potentiation and overshadowing between landmarks and environmental geometric cues , 2011, Learning & behavior.

[99]  J. Pearce,et al.  Spatial learning based on the shape of the environment is influenced by properties of the objects forming the shape. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[100]  Luca Tommasi,et al.  Representation of two geometric features of the environment in the domestic chick (Gallus gallus) , 2004, Animal Cognition.

[101]  Kent D. Bodily,et al.  Is surface-based orientation influenced by a proportional relationship of shape parameters? , 2011, Psychonomic bulletin & review.