Computer Vision Approach for Ultrasound Doppler Angle Estimation

Doppler ultrasound is an important noninvasive diagnostic tool for cardiovascular diseases. Modern ultrasound imaging systems utilize spectral Doppler techniques for quantitative evaluation of blood flow velocities, and these measurements play a crucial rule in the diagnosis and grading of arterial stenosis. One drawback of Doppler-based blood flow quantification is that the operator has to manually specify the angle between the Doppler ultrasound beam and the vessel orientation, which is called the Doppler angle, in order to calculate flow velocities. In this paper, we will describe a computer vision approach to automate the Doppler angle estimation. Our approach starts with the segmentation of blood vessels in ultrasound color Doppler images. The segmentation step is followed by an estimation technique for the Doppler angle based on a skeleton representation of the segmented vessel. We conducted preliminary clinical experiments to evaluate the agreement between the expert operator’s angle specification and the new automated method. Statistical regression analysis showed strong agreement between the manual and automated methods. We hypothesize that the automation of the Doppler angle will enhance the workflow of the ultrasound Doppler exam and achieve more standardized clinical outcome.

[1]  E. Stamm,et al.  Duplex Scanning in Vascular Disorders, 3rd ed. , 2003 .

[2]  D. E. Strandness,et al.  Duplex scanning in vascular disorders , 1990 .

[3]  P Robillard,et al.  The value of internal carotid systolic velocity ratio for assessing carotid artery stenosis with Doppler sonography. , 1999, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[4]  James S. T. Yao Duplex Scanning in Vascular Disorders, 3rd Edition , 2003 .

[5]  R S Cobbold,et al.  Sources of error in maximum velocity estimation using linear phased-array Doppler systems with steady flow. , 2001, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[6]  Ugo Montanari,et al.  Continuous Skeletons from Digitized Images , 1969, JACM.

[7]  J M Bland,et al.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement , 1986 .

[8]  R Eugene Zierler,et al.  Carotid artery stenosis: gray-scale and Doppler US diagnosis--Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Consensus Conference. , 2003, Radiology.

[9]  Yazid M. Sharaiha,et al.  Binary digital image processing - a discrete approach , 1999 .

[10]  W. McDicken,et al.  Doppler Ultrasound: Physics, Instrumentation and Signal Processing , 2000 .

[11]  Joanna M Wardlaw,et al.  Which Doppler velocity is best for assessing suitability for carotid endarterectomy? , 2002, European journal of ultrasound : official journal of the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology.

[12]  P. Hoskins,et al.  Accuracy of maximum velocity estimates made using Doppler ultrasound systems. , 1996, The British journal of radiology.

[13]  K. Johnston,et al.  Interobserver variability of carotid Doppler peak velocity measurements among technologists in an ICAVL-accredited vascular laboratory. , 2004, Journal of vascular surgery.

[14]  Linda G. Shapiro,et al.  Shape Decomposition Approach for Ultrasound Color Doppler Image Segmentation , 2006, 18th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR'06).

[15]  François de Vieilleville,et al.  Analysis and Comparative Evaluation of Discrete Tangent Estimators , 2005, DGCI.

[16]  Farzin Mokhtarian,et al.  A Theory of Multiscale, Curvature-Based Shape Representation for Planar Curves , 1992, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[17]  Beatrice Madrazo,et al.  PVO 3208 Duplex diagnostic criteria: A survey of ICAVL accredited laboratories , 1997 .

[18]  Yu-Ping Wang,et al.  Multiscale curvature-based shape representation using B-spline wavelets , 1999, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[19]  J M Wardlaw,et al.  Variability in Doppler ultrasound influences referral of patients for carotid surgery. , 2000, European journal of ultrasound : official journal of the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology.

[20]  Kaleem Siddiqi,et al.  Parts of visual form: computational aspects , 1993, Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[21]  エル クリトン,アリン,et al.  Automatic flow angle correction by ultrasound vector processing , 2001 .

[22]  Mie Sato,et al.  Penalized-Distance Volumetric Skeleton Algorithm , 2001, IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph..

[23]  Piero Tortoli,et al.  Doppler Ultrasound: Physics Instrumentation and Signal Processing (2nd Edition) , 2001 .

[24]  Richard S C Cobbold,et al.  Human factors as a source of error in peak Doppler velocity measurement. , 2005, Journal of vascular surgery.

[25]  H Becker,et al.  Standardization of Carotid Ultrasound: A Hemodynamic Method to Normalize for Interindividual and Interequipment Variability , 1999, Stroke.

[26]  Guojun Lu,et al.  Review of shape representation and description techniques , 2004, Pattern Recognit..

[27]  Carotid Arterial Ultrasound Scan Imaging: A Direct Approach to Stenosis Measurement , 1999 .