The Ethnic Composition of Science and Engineering Research Laboratories in the United States

The United States has been a top destination country for science and engineering (S&E) graduate education for foreign talent for many years. Despite the clear existence of foreign students in the USA, relatively little is known about the factors influencing the flow of foreign students. In this study, we examine foreign doctoral students in science and engineering, and test whether “ethnic affinity” plays a role in the ethnic composition of research laboratories (in what follows, “labs”) in US universities. In order to test this hypothesis, we conduct a web search, and select 164 science and engineering laboratory web pages for analysis. Among these 164 labs, 82 are directed by foreign-born faculty (Korean, Chinese, Indian or Turkish). These 82 are matched with labs that are in the same department of the same university, but directed by a native (US origin) faculty member. We find strong evidence that labs directed by foreign-born faculty are more likely to be populated by students from the same country of origin than are labs directed by native faculty. The percentage of students working in a lab from a nationality (foreign or native) is higher when they share nativity with the director. We seek to draw attention to the effect of affinity on the ethnic composition of research labs at the micro level that translates into the ethnic composition of the scientific community at the macro level. Further, these results emphasize the role of lab directors in future enrolments, creating scientific human capital, and contributing to the “brain circulation” phenomenon in the global context.

[1]  R. Waldinger Ethnicity, Social Mobility, and Public Policy: Networks and niches: the continuing significance of ethnic connections , 2005 .

[2]  Jean-Baptiste Meyer,et al.  Network Approach versus Brain Drain: Lessons from the Diaspora , 2001 .

[3]  William R. Kerr,et al.  Ethnic Scientific Communities and International Technology Diffusion , 2007, The Review of Economics and Statistics.

[4]  AnnaLee Saxenian,et al.  Brain Circulation: How High-Skill Immigration Makes Everyone Better Off , 2002 .

[5]  Zeynep Esra Tanyildiz The Effects of Networks on Institution Selection by Foreign Doctoral Students in the U.S. , 2008 .

[6]  M. Poros The role of migrant networks in linking local labour markets: the case of Asian Indian migration to New York and London , 2001 .

[7]  N. Aslanbeigui,et al.  Foreign Students in U.S. Doctoral Programs , 1998 .

[8]  G. Borjas Do Foreign Students Crowd Out Native Students from Graduate Programs? , 2004 .

[9]  Richard B. Freeman What Does Global Expansion of Higher Education Mean for the Us? , 2009 .

[10]  Aaditya Mattoo,et al.  The Contribution of Skilled Immigration and International Graduate Students to U.S. Innovation , 2005 .

[11]  B. Khadria Shifting Paradigms of Globalization: The Twenty‐first Century Transition Towards Generics in Skilled Migration from India , 2001 .

[12]  Paula E. Stephan,et al.  The Economics of University Lab Science and the Role of Foreign Graduate Students and Postdoctoral Scholars , 2008 .

[13]  R. Kloosterman,et al.  Immigrant entrepreneurs in advanced economies: Mixed embeddedness further explored , 2001 .

[14]  Paula E. Stephan,et al.  Foreign Scholars in U.S. Science: Contributions and Costs , 2003 .

[15]  A. Portes,et al.  Embeddedness and Immigration: Notes on the Social Determinants of Economic Action , 1993, American Journal of Sociology.

[16]  M. F. Fox Gender, Faculty, and Doctoral Education in Science and Engineering , 2003 .

[17]  Graeme Hugo,et al.  Theories of international migration: a review and appraisal. , 1993 .

[18]  R. Skeldon,et al.  Migrating to learn and learning to migrate: a study of the experiences and intentions of international student migrants. , 1996, International journal of population geography : IJPG.

[19]  M. Finn,et al.  Stay Rates of Foreign Doctorate Recipients from U.S. Universities, 2007 , 2010 .