Amorphous Silicon, Flat-Panel, X-ray Detector: Reliability of Digital Image Fusion Regarding Angle and Distance Measurements in Long-Leg Radiography

Rationale and Objectives:To evaluate composed long-leg images acquired with a large-area, flat-panel x-ray detector with regard to angle and distance measurements. Methods:Radiographs of a long-leg phantom were acquired at 13 different angle settings with a 43-cm × 43-cm digital x-ray detector based on cesium iodide (CsI) and amorphous silicon (a-Si) technology. Three overlapping single images of the phantom were reconstructed at a workstation using a generalized correlation method. Four blinded observers were instructed to determine the angle of the axis of the long-legs as well as the length of “femur” and “tibia” on soft-copy displays. For that, the angle and distance measurement software integrated in the workstation was used. The images were analyzed with and without prior manual fine tuning of the primary composition result according to a mapped scale. Standard of reference was angle and distance determination at the phantom. Results:On average, the difference between the observers’ angle measurements and the standard of reference was 0.4° for both images with and without prior manual correction. Regarding distance measurements, the average discrepancies to the standard were 0.2 cm (femur) and 0.1 cm (tibia) when analyzing images that had undergone manual fine tuning and 0.5 cm and 0.7 cm, respectively, for images without manual correction. Conclusions:The evaluated image fusion algorithm in conjunction with a 43-cm × 43-cm flat-panel detector is feasible regarding angle and distance measurements on long-leg images. In the case of inaccurate primary composition, results can be corrected easily by manual fine tuning.

[1]  Zhenyu Wu,et al.  Automatic mosaic and display from a sequence of peripheral angiographic images , 1997, Medical Imaging.

[2]  M. Völk,et al.  Amorphous silicon, flat-panel, x-ray detector versus screen-film radiography: effect of dose reduction on the detectability of cortical bone defects and fractures. , 1998, Investigative radiology.

[3]  J Yorkston,et al.  Signal, noise power spectrum, and detective quantum efficiency of indirect-detection flat-panel imagers for diagnostic radiology. , 1998, Medical physics.

[4]  Pieter Vuylsteke,et al.  Full-leg/full-spine image stitching: a new and accurate CR-based imaging technique , 1999, Medical Imaging.

[5]  B Geiger,et al.  Digital radiography with a large-area, amorphous-silicon, flat-panel X-ray detector system. , 2000, Investigative radiology.

[6]  J Persliden,et al.  Digital radiography of scoliosis with a scanning method: initial evaluation. , 2001, Radiology.

[7]  F. Fischbach,et al.  Flat Panel Digital Radiography Compared With Storage Phosphor Computed Radiography: Assessment of Dose Versus Image Quality in Phantom Studies , 2002, Investigative radiology.

[8]  Leonard Berliner,et al.  Scoliosis evaluation by direct digital radiography and computerized post-processing. , 2002, Journal of digital imaging.

[9]  E. Kotter,et al.  Digital radiography with large-area flat-panel detectors , 2002, European Radiology.

[10]  Markus Völk,et al.  Evaluation of Lossy Data Compression of Chest X-Rays: A Receiver Operating Characteristic Study , 2003, Investigative radiology.

[11]  W. Heindel,et al.  Lumbar spine radiography: digital flat-panel detector versus screen-film and storage-phosphor systems in monkeys as a pediatric model. , 2003, Radiology.

[12]  M. Völk,et al.  Routine Skeleton Radiography Using a Flat-Panel Detector: Image Quality and Clinical Acceptance at 50% Dose Reduction , 2003, Investigative radiology.

[13]  Marcus Völk,et al.  Digital Image Composition in Long-Leg Radiography With a Flat-Panel Detector: First Clinical Experiences , 2003, Investigative radiology.

[14]  Boris Radeleff,et al.  Comparing image quality of flat-panel chest radiography with storage phosphor radiography and film-screen radiography. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[15]  Hagen Schmidl,et al.  Flat-panel x-ray detector based on amorphous silicon versus asymmetric screen-film system: phantom study of dose reduction and depiction of simulated findings. , 2003, Radiology.

[16]  Peter Smeets,et al.  Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.