Bayesian epistemology

‘Bayesian epistemology’ became an epistemological movement in the 20 century, though its two main features can be traced back to the eponymous Reverend Thomas Bayes (c. 1701–61). Those two features are: (1) the introduction of a formal apparatus for inductive logic; (2) the introduction of a pragmatic self-defeat test (as illustrated by Dutch Book Arguments) for epistemic rationality as a way of extending the justification of the laws of deductive logic to include a justification for the laws of inductive logic. The formal apparatus itself has two main elements: the use of the laws of probability as coherence constraints on rational degrees of belief (or degrees of confidence) and the introduction of a rule of probabilistic inference, a rule or principle of conditionalization. Bayesian epistemology did not emerge as a philosophical program until the first formal axiomatizations of probability theory in the first half of the 20 century. One important application of Bayesian epistemology has been to the analysis of scientific practice in Bayesian Confirmation Theory. In addition, a major branch of statistics, Bayesian statistics, is based on Bayesian principles. In psychology, an important branch of learning theory, Bayesian learning theory, is also based on Bayesian principles. Finally, the idea of analyzing rational degrees of belief in terms of rational betting behavior led to the 20 century development of a new kind of decision theory, Bayesian decision theory, which is now the dominant theoretical model for both the descriptive and normative analysis of decisions. The combination of its precise formal apparatus and its novel pragmatic self-defeat test for justification makes Bayesian epistemology one of the most important developments in epistemology in the 20 century, and one of the most promising avenues for further progress in epistemology in the 21 century. 1. Deductive and Probabilistic Coherence and Deductive and Probabilistic Rules of Inference 2. A Simple Principle of Conditionalization 3. Dutch Book Arguments 4. Bayes' Theorem and Bayesian Confirmation Theory Bayes' Theorem and a Corollary Bayesian Confirmation Theory 5. Bayesian Social Epistemology 6. Potential Problems 6.1 Objections to the Probability Laws as Standards of Synchronic Coherence 6.2 Objections to The Simple Principle of Conditionalization as a Rule of Inference and Other Objections to Bayesian Confirmation Theory 7. Other Principles of Bayesian Epistemology Bibliography Academic Tools Other Internet Resources Related Entries

[1]  B. D. Finetti La prévision : ses lois logiques, ses sources subjectives , 1937 .

[2]  David Lindley,et al.  Logical foundations of probability , 1951 .

[3]  N. Goodman Fact, Fiction, and Forecast , 1955 .

[4]  A. Rényi On a new axiomatic theory of probability , 1955 .

[5]  M. Resnik,et al.  Aspects of Scientific Explanation. , 1966 .

[6]  Ian Hacking,et al.  Slightly More Realistic Personal Probability , 1967, Philosophy of Science.

[7]  Edwin T. Jaynes,et al.  Prior Probabilities , 1968, Encyclopedia of Machine Learning.

[8]  J. Doob What is a Martingale , 1971 .

[9]  P. Horwich Probability and Evidence , 1972 .

[10]  Paul Teller,et al.  Conditionalization, Observation, and Change of Preference , 1976 .

[11]  Isaac Levi,et al.  The Enterprise Of Knowledge , 1980 .

[12]  D. Lewis A Subjectivist’s Guide to Objective Chance , 1980 .

[13]  Marc Snir,et al.  Probabilities over rich languages, testing and randomness , 1982, Journal of Symbolic Logic.

[14]  Mark Kaplan Decision Theory as Philosophy , 1983, Philosophy of Science.

[15]  Bas C. van Fraassen,et al.  Calibration: A Frequency Justification for Personal Probability , 1983 .

[16]  Daniel Garber,et al.  Old Evidence and Logical Omniscience in Bayesian Confirmation Theory , 1983 .

[17]  B. Skyrms Pragmatics And Empiricism , 1986 .

[18]  P. Maher,et al.  Prediction, Accommodation, and the Logic of Discovery , 1988, PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association.

[19]  Peter Urbach,et al.  Scientific Reasoning: The Bayesian Approach , 1989 .

[20]  Joseph B. Kadane,et al.  You have printed the following article : On the Shared Preferences of Two Bayesian Decision Makers , 2008 .

[21]  Philip Kitcher,et al.  The Division of Cognitive Labor , 1990 .

[22]  H. Kyburg,et al.  Nomic probability and the foundations of induction , 1990 .

[23]  Lyle Zynda,et al.  Old evidence and new theories , 1995 .

[24]  L. G. Neuberg,et al.  Bayes or Bust?-A Critical Examination of Bayesian Confirmation Theory. , 1994 .

[25]  Jaines M. Joyce A Nonpragmatic Vindication of Probabilism , 1998, Philosophy of Science.

[26]  A. Goldman Knowledge in a Social World , 1999 .

[27]  Branden Fitelson The Plurality of Bayesian Measures of Confirmation and the Problem of Measure Sensitivity , 1999, Philosophy of Science.

[28]  Marc Lange,et al.  Calibration and the Epistemological Role of Bayesian Conditionalization , 1999 .

[29]  Jon Williamson,et al.  Countable Additivity and Subjective Probability , 1999, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[30]  E. Eells,et al.  Measuring Confirmation and Evidence , 2000 .

[31]  E. Eells,et al.  Symmetries and Asymmetries in Evidential Support , 2002 .

[32]  Elliott Sober,et al.  Bayesianism: its scope and limits , 2002 .

[33]  Michael Strevens,et al.  Bayesian Confirmation Theory: Inductive Logic, or Mere Inductive Framework? , 2004, Synthese.

[34]  Jeffrey M. Mikkelson Dissolving the Wine/Water Paradox , 2004, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[35]  E. Barnes Predictivism for Pluralists , 2005, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[36]  David Christensen,et al.  Putting logic in its place - formal constraints on rational belief , 2005 .

[37]  H. Lacker,et al.  Bayesian statistics at work: the troublesome extraction of the CKM phase alpha , 2006, hep-ph/0607246.

[38]  Law and rule in the Essay towards solving a problem in the doctrine of chances. , 2015, Revue de synthese.

[39]  F. Ramsey Truth and Probability , 2016 .