High ligation of the hernia sac in open nonmesh inguinal herniorrhaphy is an important cause of iatrogenic vas deferens injury.

Vasectomy damage is a common complication of open nonmesh hernia repair. This study was a retrospective analysis of the characteristics and possible causes of vas deferens injuries in patients exhibiting unilateral or bilateral vasal obstruction caused by open nonmesh inguinal herniorrhaphy. The site of the obstructed vas deferens was intraoperatively confirmed. Data, surgical methods, and patient outcomes were examined. The Anderson-Darling test was applied to test for Gaussian distribution of data. Fisher's exact test or Mann-Whitney U test and unpaired t-test were used for statistical analyses. The mean age at operation was 7.23 (standard deviation [s.d.]: 2.09) years and the mean obstructive interval was 17.72 (s.d.: 2.73) years. Crossed (n = 1) and inguinal (n = 42) vasovasostomies were performed. The overall patency rate was 85.3% (29/34). Among the 43 enrolled patients (mean age: 24.95 [s.d.: 2.20] years), 73 sides of their inguinal regions were explored. The disconnected end of the vas deferens was found in the internal ring on 54 sides (74.0%), was found in the inguinal canal on 16 sides (21.9%), and was found in the pelvic cavity on 3 sides (4.1%). Location of the vas deferens injury did not significantly differ according to age at the time of hernia surgery (≥12 years or <12 years) or obstructive interval (≥15 years or <15 years). These results underscore that high ligation of the hernial sac warrants extra caution by surgeons during open nonmesh inguinal herniorrhaphy.

[1]  R. Ramasamy,et al.  Challenges in completing a successful vasectomy reversal , 2021, Andrologia.

[2]  P. Ridgway,et al.  Polypropylene mesh and systemic side effects in inguinal hernia repair: current evidence , 2019, Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -).

[3]  F. Korkes,et al.  Crossover transseptal vasovasostomy: alternative for very selected cases of iatrogenic injury to vas deferens , 2019, International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology.

[4]  R. Kumar,et al.  Prospective analysis of factors predicting feasibility & success of longitudinal intussusception vasoepididymostomy in men with idiopathic obstructive azoospermia , 2019, The Indian journal of medical research.

[5]  O. Bouchot,et al.  Influence of inguinal hernia repair on male fertility. , 2018, Journal of visceral surgery.

[6]  Mayuko F Kato,et al.  Vasovasostomy and vasoepididymostomy: Review of the procedures, outcomes, and predictors of patency and pregnancy over the last decade , 2018, Reproductive medicine and biology.

[7]  M. Goldstein,et al.  Microsurgically Assisted Inguinal Hernia Repair and Simultaneous Male Fertility Procedures: Rationale, Technique and Outcomes , 2017, The Journal of urology.

[8]  K. Shiraishi,et al.  Surgical comparison of subinguinal and high inguinal microsurgical varicocelectomy for adolescent varicocele , 2016, International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association.

[9]  E. Sabanegh,et al.  Comparative Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Modified 1-Layer versus Formal 2-Layer Vasovasostomy Technique. , 2016, The Journal of urology.

[10]  L. Lipshultz,et al.  Microscopic visualization of intravasal spermatozoa is positively associated with patency after bilateral microsurgical vasovasostomy , 2015, Andrology.

[11]  L. Lipshultz,et al.  Association between the presence of sperm in the vasal fluid during vasectomy reversal and postoperative patency: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2015, Urology.

[12]  Hong-xiang Wang,et al.  Clinical features and therapeutic strategies of obstructive azoospermia in patients treated by bilateral inguinal hernia repair in childhood , 2014, Asian journal of andrology.

[13]  E. Sabanegh,et al.  Obstructive azoospermia: reconstructive techniques and results , 2013, Clinics.

[14]  T. van Dalen,et al.  Male infertility after endoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal (Tep) hernia repair (Main): rationale and design of a prospective observational cohort study , 2012, BMC Surgery.

[15]  S. Rais-Bahrami,et al.  Impact of obstructive interval and sperm granuloma on patency and pregnancy after vasectomy reversal. , 2010, International journal of andrology.

[16]  R. Meacham,et al.  Vasal reconstruction above the internal inguinal ring: what are the options? , 2006, Journal of andrology.

[17]  K. Shaeer,et al.  Pelviscrotal vasovasostomy: refining and troubleshooting. , 2005, The Journal of urology.

[18]  M. Goldstein,et al.  Herniorrhaphy With Polypropylene Mesh Causing Inguinal Vasal Obstruction: A Preventable Cause of Obstructive Azoospermia , 2005, Annals of surgery.

[19]  T. Matsuda,et al.  Unilateral obstruction of the vas deferens caused by childhood inguinal herniorrhaphy in male infertility patients. , 1992, Fertility and sterility.

[20]  S. Boorjian,et al.  The impact of obstructive interval and sperm granuloma on outcome of vasectomy reversal. , 2004, The Journal of urology.