Effects of light and heavy workload on air traffic tactical operations: a hazard rate model

This paper introduces a class of event history analysis used to examine how the operations of an air traffic controller change under light and heavy traffic workload. The analysis begins by assessing the hazard rate, h(t), of a transition (or spell) between the controller's communication and flight progress activities. h(t) is the instantaneous rate of going from one state (i.e. an activity of communication or flight progress) to another in a unit of time, given that the controller has been in the first state until time t. Results indicated that the spell distribution closely followed a Weibull distribution, a prerequisite for this analysis. The results also indicated that h(t) was more likely regulated by time in heavy than in light workload conditions, and that under heavy workload, indirect speech from the planner controller would decrease the h(t) for communication to flight progress spells. The results suggest that a dynamic model for the analysis of air traffic control may be necessary, and that the...

[1]  Drew Debelack,et al.  Next Generation Air Traffic Control Automation , 1995, IBM Syst. J..

[2]  Roger Bakeman,et al.  Observing Interaction: An Introduction to Sequential Analysis , 1986 .

[3]  H Zeier,et al.  Workload and psychophysiological stress reactions in air traffic controllers. , 1994, Ergonomics.

[4]  W. Weibull A Statistical Distribution Function of Wide Applicability , 1951 .

[5]  G. Costa,et al.  Evaluation of workload in air traffic controllers. , 1993, Ergonomics.

[6]  N. Debbache,et al.  Expert system and dynamic allocation applied to air traffic control , 1994 .

[7]  Trond Petersen,et al.  RECENT ADVANCES IN LONGITUDINAL METHODOLOGY , 1993 .

[8]  J. Kalbfleisch,et al.  The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data , 1980 .

[9]  Penelope M. Sanderson,et al.  Exploratory sequential data analysis: foundations , 1994 .

[10]  Nicholas V. Findler,et al.  Distributed Air-Traffic Control. II: Explorations in Test Bed , 1993 .

[11]  C. Linde The quantitative study of communicative success: Politeness and accidents in aviation discourse , 1988, Language in Society.

[12]  S. Casner Understanding the Determinants of Problem-Solving Behavior in a Complex Environment , 1994 .

[13]  N. Shadbolt,et al.  Eliciting Knowledge from Experts: A Methodological Analysis , 1995 .

[14]  Carol A. Manning,et al.  The role of flight progress strips in en route air traffic control: a time-series analysis , 1995, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[15]  P. Allison Event History Analysis , 1984 .

[16]  J. Singer,et al.  QUANTITATIVE METHODS IN PSYCHOLOGY Modeling the Days of Our Lives: Using Survival Analysis When Designing and Analyzing Longitudinal Studies of Duration and the Timing of Events , 1991 .

[17]  Carol A. Manning,et al.  Sequences of actions for individual and teams of air traffic controllers , 1994 .

[18]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Strategic workload management and decision biases in aviation , 1994 .

[19]  C. Spettell,et al.  Training for safety in automated person-machine systems. , 1986, The American psychologist.

[20]  D. Cox Regression Models and Life-Tables , 1972 .

[21]  Nicholas V. Findler,et al.  Distributed Air‐Traffic Control. I: Theoretical Studies , 1993 .

[22]  H. Simon,et al.  The mind's eye in chess. , 1973 .

[23]  David O'Hare,et al.  The 'Artful' Decision Maker: A Framework Model for Aeronautical Decision Making , 1992 .

[24]  Jerald F. Lawless,et al.  Statistical Models and Methods for Lifetime Data. , 1983 .

[25]  R. Samurcay,et al.  Cooperative work and decision making in emergency management , 1993 .

[26]  A Agresti,et al.  Tutorial on modeling ordered categorical response data. , 1989, Psychological bulletin.

[27]  Bryan Dodson DETERMINING THE OPTIMUM SCHEDULE FOR PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE , 1994 .