Weighted and unweighted network of amino acids within protein

The information regarding the structure of a single protein is encoded in the network of interacting amino acids considered as nodes. If any two atoms from two different amino acids (nodes) are within higher cut-off distance of London-van der Waals forces, the amino acids are considered to be linked or connected. Several atoms of any amino acids in a protein may be within the above prescribed distance of several atoms of another amino acid resulting in possible multiple links between them. These multiple links are the basis of the weight of the connectivity in a protein network. Each protein has been considered as a weighted and an unweighted network of amino acids. A total of forty nine protein structures that covers the three branches of life on earth has been analyzed and several network properties have been studied. The probability degree and strength distributions of network connectivity have been obtained. It has been observed that the average strength of amino acid node depends on its degree. The results show that the average clustering coefficient of weighted network is less than that of unweighted network. It implies that the topological clustering is generated by edges with low weights. The power-law behavior of clustering coefficients of weighted and unweighted networks as a function of degree indicates that they have signatures of hierarchy. It has also been observed that the network is of assortative type.

[1]  J. Montoya,et al.  Small world patterns in food webs. , 2002, Journal of theoretical biology.

[2]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Lethality and centrality in protein networks , 2001, Nature.

[3]  E. Shakhnovich,et al.  Topological determinants of protein folding , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[5]  S. Wuchty Scale-free behavior in protein domain networks. , 2001, Molecular biology and evolution.

[6]  A. Vespignani,et al.  The architecture of complex weighted networks. , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  Sudip Kundu,et al.  Amino acid network within protein , 2005 .

[8]  M E J Newman Assortative mixing in networks. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[9]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations , 2001, cond-mat/0104162.

[10]  Victoria A. Higman,et al.  Uncovering network systems within protein structures. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[11]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[12]  M Karplus,et al.  Small-world view of the amino acids that play a key role in protein folding. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[13]  H E Stanley,et al.  Classes of small-world networks. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  R. Albert,et al.  The large-scale organization of metabolic networks , 2000, Nature.

[15]  M. Gerstein,et al.  Protein family and fold occurrence in genomes: power-law behaviour and evolutionary model. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[16]  平山 令明,et al.  PDB (Protein Data Bank)とその周辺 , 1996 .

[17]  C. Branden,et al.  Introduction to protein structure , 1991 .

[18]  D. Fell,et al.  The small world inside large metabolic networks , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[19]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Hierarchical Organization of Modularity in Metabolic Networks , 2002, Science.

[20]  A. Wagner The yeast protein interaction network evolves rapidly and contains few redundant duplicate genes. , 2001, Molecular biology and evolution.

[21]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Network biology: understanding the cell's functional organization , 2004, Nature Reviews Genetics.