Protein‐binding site prediction based on three‐dimensional protein modeling

Structural information of a protein can guide one to understand the function of the protein, and ligand binding is one of the major biochemical functions of proteins. We have applied a two‐stage template‐based ligand binding site prediction method to CASP8 targets and achieved high quality results with accuracy/coverage = 70/80 (LEE). First, templates are used for protein structure modeling and then for binding site prediction by structural clustering of ligand‐containing templates to the predicted protein model. Remarkably, the results are only a few percent worse than those one can obtain from native structures, which were available only after the prediction. Prediction was performed without knowing identity of ligands, and consequently, in many cases the ligand molecules used for prediction were different from the actual ligands, and yet we find that the prediction was quite successful. The current approach can be easily combined with experiments to investigate protein activities in a systematic way. Proteins 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  Jooyoung Lee,et al.  New optimization method for conformational energy calculations on polypeptides: Conformational space annealing , 1997, J. Comput. Chem..

[2]  Julian Lee,et al.  Unbiased global optimization of Lennard-Jones clusters for N < or =201 using the conformational space annealing method. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[3]  Arne Elofsson,et al.  3D-Jury: A Simple Approach to Improve Protein Structure Predictions , 2003, Bioinform..

[4]  Keehyoung Joo,et al.  All‐atom chain‐building by optimizing MODELLER energy function using conformational space annealing , 2009, Proteins.

[5]  Keehyoung Joo,et al.  High accuracy template based modeling by global optimization , 2007, Proteins.

[6]  Alfonso Valencia,et al.  FireDB—a database of functionally important residues from proteins of known structure , 2006, Nucleic Acids Res..

[7]  Alfonso Valencia,et al.  Assessment of predictions submitted for the CASP7 function prediction category. , 2007, Proteins.

[8]  M. Schroeder,et al.  LIGSITEcsc: predicting ligand binding sites using the Connolly surface and degree of conservation , 2006, BMC Structural Biology.

[9]  John Moult,et al.  A decade of CASP: progress, bottlenecks and prognosis in protein structure prediction. , 2005, Current opinion in structural biology.

[10]  Keehyoung Joo,et al.  Multiple sequence alignment by conformational space annealing. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[11]  Randy J Read,et al.  Assessment of CASP7 predictions in the high accuracy template‐based modeling category , 2007, Proteins.

[12]  Richard M. Jackson,et al.  Q-SiteFinder: an energy-based method for the prediction of protein-ligand binding sites , 2005, Bioinform..

[13]  Shugo Nakamura,et al.  Highly accurate method for ligand‐binding site prediction in unbound state (apo) protein structures , 2008, Proteins.

[14]  J. Skolnick,et al.  A threading-based method (FINDSITE) for ligand-binding site prediction and functional annotation , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  Torsten Schwede,et al.  Assessment of CASP7 predictions for template‐based modeling targets , 2007, Proteins.

[16]  Yang Zhang,et al.  Scoring function for automated assessment of protein structure template quality , 2004, Proteins.

[17]  Arun K. Ramani,et al.  Protein interaction networks from yeast to human. , 2004, Current opinion in structural biology.