Evolution of Evolvability in Gene Regulatory Networks

Gene regulatory networks are perhaps the most important organizational level in the cell where signals from the cell state and the outside environment are integrated in terms of activation and inhibition of genes. For the last decade, the study of such networks has been fueled by large-scale experiments and renewed attention from the theoretical field. Different models have been proposed to, for instance, investigate expression dynamics, explain the network topology we observe in bacteria and yeast, and for the analysis of evolvability and robustness of such networks. Yet how these gene regulatory networks evolve and become evolvable remains an open question. An individual-oriented evolutionary model is used to shed light on this matter. Each individual has a genome from which its gene regulatory network is derived. Mutations, such as gene duplications and deletions, alter the genome, while the resulting network determines the gene expression pattern and hence fitness. With this protocol we let a population of individuals evolve under Darwinian selection in an environment that changes through time. Our work demonstrates that long-term evolution of complex gene regulatory networks in a changing environment can lead to a striking increase in the efficiency of generating beneficial mutations. We show that the population evolves towards genotype-phenotype mappings that allow for an orchestrated network-wide change in the gene expression pattern, requiring only a few specific gene indels. The genes involved are hubs of the networks, or directly influencing the hubs. Moreover, throughout the evolutionary trajectory the networks maintain their mutational robustness. In other words, evolution in an alternating environment leads to a network that is sensitive to a small class of beneficial mutations, while the majority of mutations remain neutral: an example of evolution of evolvability.

[1]  B. Snel,et al.  Predicting gene function by conserved co-expression. , 2003, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[2]  D. Botstein,et al.  Systematic changes in gene expression patterns following adaptive evolution in yeast. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  Sri R. Paladugu,et al.  In silico evolution of functional modules in biochemical networks. , 2006, Systems biology.

[4]  V. Hakim,et al.  Design of genetic networks with specified functions by evolution in silico. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  Weinberger,et al.  RNA folding and combinatory landscapes. , 1993, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[6]  Q. Ouyang,et al.  The yeast cell-cycle network is robustly designed. , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  S. Shen-Orr,et al.  Network motifs: simple building blocks of complex networks. , 2002, Science.

[8]  A. Wagner,et al.  Innovation and robustness in complex regulatory gene networks , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  Otto X. Cordero,et al.  Feed-forward loop circuits as a side effect of genome evolution. , 2006, Molecular biology and evolution.

[10]  W. Banzhaf,et al.  Network topology and the evolution of dynamics in an artificial genetic regulatory network model created by whole genome duplication and divergence. , 2006, Bio Systems.

[11]  M. Pigliucci Is evolvability evolvable? , 2008, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[12]  L. Altenberg,et al.  PERSPECTIVE: COMPLEX ADAPTATIONS AND THE EVOLUTION OF EVOLVABILITY , 1996, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[13]  Sebastian Bonhoeffer,et al.  The Evolution of Connectivity in Metabolic Networks , 2005, PLoS biology.

[14]  R. Rosengarten,et al.  Phenotypic switching of variable surface lipoproteins in Mycoplasma bovis involves high-frequency chromosomal rearrangements , 1996, Journal of bacteriology.

[15]  S. Teichmann,et al.  Gene regulatory network growth by duplication , 2004, Nature Genetics.

[16]  Uri Alon,et al.  Varying environments can speed up evolution , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  S. Kauffman,et al.  Robustness and evolvability in genetic regulatory networks. , 2007, Journal of theoretical biology.

[18]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Network biology: understanding the cell's functional organization , 2004, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[19]  U. Alon,et al.  Spontaneous evolution of modularity and network motifs. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  Nicolas E. Buchler,et al.  Nonlinear protein degradation and the function of genetic circuits. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  Paulien Hogeweg,et al.  The Effect of Stochasticity on the Lac Operon: An Evolutionary Perspective , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[22]  Andreas Wagner,et al.  Robustness Can Evolve Gradually in Complex Regulatory Gene Networks with Varying Topology , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[23]  Sebastian Bonhoeffer,et al.  Simulating the evolution of signal transduction pathways. , 2006, Journal of theoretical biology.

[24]  Anton Crombach,et al.  Chromosome rearrangements and the evolution of genome structuring and adaptability. , 2007, Molecular biology and evolution.

[25]  C. Hemelrijk Self-organisation and evolution of social systems , 2005 .

[26]  K. Dybvig,et al.  DNA rearrangements and phenotypic switching in prokaryotes , 1993, Molecular microbiology.

[27]  Ricard V Solé,et al.  Neutral fitness landscapes in signalling networks , 2007, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[28]  A. Wagner Robustness, evolvability, and neutrality , 2005, FEBS letters.

[29]  M. Blaser,et al.  Nested DNA inversion as a paradigm of programmed gene rearrangement. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  B. de Boer Self-organisation and Evolution of Social Systems , 2005 .

[31]  Paulien Hogeweg,et al.  Evolutionary Consequences of Coevolving Targets , 1997, Evolutionary Computation.

[32]  Milan van Hoek,et al.  In silico evolved lac operons exhibit bistability for artificial inducers, but not for lactose. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[33]  R. Lenski,et al.  Evolution of global regulatory networks during a long‐term experiment with Escherichia coli , 2007, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[34]  S. Kauffman Metabolic stability and epigenesis in randomly constructed genetic nets. , 1969, Journal of theoretical biology.

[35]  S Bullock,et al.  Modelling the evolution of genetic regulatory networks. , 2006, Journal of theoretical biology.

[36]  Sebastian Bonhoeffer,et al.  Evolution of complexity in signaling pathways , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  Nicola J. Rinaldi,et al.  Transcriptional Regulatory Networks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2002, Science.

[38]  Günter P. Wagner,et al.  Complex Adaptations and the Evolution of Evolvability , 2005 .

[39]  David Botstein,et al.  Characteristic genome rearrangements in experimental evolution of Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[40]  S. Grimmond,et al.  The phasevarion: a genetic system controlling coordinated, random switching of expression of multiple genes. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[41]  K. Kaneko,et al.  Adaptive Response of a Gene Network to Environmental Changes by Fitness-Induced Attractor Selection , 2006, PloS one.