Detecting implausible social network effects in acne, height, and headaches: longitudinal analysis

Objective To investigate whether “network effects” can be detected for health outcomes that are unlikely to be subject to network phenomena. Design Statistical analysis common in network studies, such as logistic regression analysis, controlled for own and friend’s lagged health status. Analyses controlled for environmental confounders. Setting Subsamples of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add Health). Participants 4300 to 5400 male and female adolescents who nominated a friend in the dataset and who were both longitudinally surveyed. Measurements Health outcomes, including headache severity, acne severity, and height self reported by respondents in 1994-5, 1995-6, and 2000-1. Results Significant network effects were observed in the acquisition of acne, headaches, and height. A friend’s acne problems increased an individual’s odds of acne problems (odds ratio 1.62, 95% confidence interval 0.91 to 2.89). The likelihood that an individual had headaches also increased with the presence of a friend with headaches (1.47, 0.93 to 2.33); and an individual’s height increased by 20% of his or her friend’s height (0.18, 0.15 to 0.26). Each of these results was estimated by using standard methods found in several publications. After adjustment for environmental confounders, however, the results become uniformly smaller and insignificant. Conclusions Researchers should be cautious in attributing correlations in health outcomes of close friends to social network effects, especially when environmental confounders are not adequately controlled for in the analysis.

[1]  E. Mills,et al.  Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics , 1987 .

[2]  C. Manski Identification of Endogenous Social Effects: The Reflection Problem , 1993 .

[3]  S. Paxton,et al.  Psychosocial predictors of weight loss behaviors and binge eating in adolescent girls and boys , 1992 .

[4]  J. Sterne,et al.  Sifting the evidence-what's wrong with significance tests? , 2001, Physical therapy.

[5]  G. Lilien,et al.  Medical Innovation Revisited: Social Contagion versus Marketing Effort1 , 2001, American Journal of Sociology.

[6]  Jonathan A C Sterne,et al.  Sifting the evidence—what's wrong with significance tests? , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[7]  Tamara D. Madensen,et al.  Neighborhood Effects , 2021, Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science.

[8]  J. Kagel,et al.  Dynamic Discrete Choice Models with Lagged Social Interactions: with an Application to a Signaling Game Experiment , 2006 .

[9]  Bernard Fortin,et al.  Identification of Peer Effects through Social Networks , 2007, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[10]  N. Christakis,et al.  The Spread of Obesity in a Large Social Network Over 32 Years , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  N. Christakis,et al.  SUPPLEMENTARY ONLINE MATERIAL FOR: The Collective Dynamics of Smoking in a Large Social Network , 2022 .

[12]  H. Raspe,et al.  Back pain, a communicable disease? , 2008 .

[13]  Jason M. Fletcher,et al.  Is Obesity Contagious? Social Networks vs. Environmental Factors in the Obesity Epidemic , 2008, Journal of Health Economics.