A Novel Geometry-Based Approach to Infer Protein Interface Similarity

[1]  Daisuke Kihara,et al.  PL-PatchSurfer2: Improved Local Surface Matching-Based Virtual Screening Method That Is Tolerant to Target and Ligand Structure Variation , 2016, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[2]  Yang Zhang,et al.  Predicting the Effect of Mutations on Protein-Protein Binding Interactions through Structure-Based Interface Profiles , 2015, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[3]  Shuai Cheng Li,et al.  Compare local pocket and global protein structure models by small structure patterns , 2015, BCB.

[4]  Xin Gao,et al.  Finding optimal interaction interface alignments between biological complexes , 2015, Bioinform..

[5]  Daisuke Kihara,et al.  Large-scale binding ligand prediction by improved patch-based method Patch-Surfer2.0 , 2015, Bioinform..

[6]  Nir Ben-Tal,et al.  Representation of the Protein Universe using Classifications, Maps, and Networks , 2014 .

[7]  Sergey Nepomnyachiy,et al.  Global view of the protein universe , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  Jack A Tuszynski,et al.  A simple method for finding a protein’s ligand-binding pockets , 2014, BMC Structural Biology.

[9]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Non-Redundant Unique Interface Structures as Templates for Modeling Protein Interactions , 2014, PloS one.

[10]  Ilya A Vakser,et al.  Global and local structural similarity in protein–protein complexes: Implications for template‐based docking , 2013, Proteins.

[11]  Arnaud Céol,et al.  3did: a catalog of domain-based interactions of known three-dimensional structure , 2013, Nucleic Acids Res..

[12]  Hui Sun Lee,et al.  Ligand Binding Site Detection by Local Structure Alignment and Its Performance Complementarity , 2013, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[13]  Jie Li,et al.  Measuring the shapes of macromolecules – and why it matters , 2013, Computational and structural biotechnology journal.

[14]  Jeffrey Skolnick,et al.  APoc: large-scale identification of similar protein pockets , 2013, Bioinform..

[15]  Frédéric Cazals,et al.  Characterizing the morphology of protein binding patches , 2012, Proteins.

[16]  Jinfeng Zhang,et al.  Protein Surface Matching by Combining Local and Global Geometric Information , 2012, PloS one.

[17]  Chi-Ren Shyu,et al.  PBSword: a web server for searching similar protein–protein binding sites , 2012, Nucleic Acids Res..

[18]  D. Kihara,et al.  Detecting local ligand‐binding site similarity in nonhomologous proteins by surface patch comparison , 2012, Proteins.

[19]  Vasant Honavar,et al.  Predicting protein-protein interface residues using local surface structural similarity , 2012, BMC Bioinformatics.

[20]  Petras J. Kundrotas,et al.  Protein Docking by the Interface Structure Similarity: How Much Structure Is Needed? , 2012, PloS one.

[21]  Yan Yuan Tseng,et al.  Classification of protein functional surfaces using structural characteristics , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  Daisuke Kihara,et al.  Molecular surface representation using 3D Zernike descriptors for protein shape comparison and docking. , 2011, Current protein & peptide science.

[23]  Ozlem Keskin,et al.  Prediction of protein–protein interactions: unifying evolution and structure at protein interfaces , 2011, Physical biology.

[24]  R. Kolodny,et al.  A library of protein surface patches discriminates between native structures and decoys generated by structure prediction servers , 2011, BMC Structural Biology.

[25]  Daisuke Kihara,et al.  Binding Ligand Prediction for Proteins Using Partial Matching of Local Surface Patches , 2010, International journal of molecular sciences.

[26]  Jeffrey Skolnick,et al.  iAlign: a method for the structural comparison of protein-protein interfaces , 2010, Bioinform..

[27]  D. Kihara,et al.  Real‐time ligand binding pocket database search using local surface descriptors , 2010, Proteins.

[28]  Inbal Budowski-Tal,et al.  FragBag, an accurate representation of protein structure, retrieves structural neighbors from the entire PDB quickly and accurately , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  Daisuke Kihara,et al.  3D-SURFER: software for high-throughput protein surface comparison and analysis , 2009, Bioinform..

[30]  Jae-Seong Yang,et al.  Evolutionary conservation in multiple faces of protein interaction , 2009, Proteins.

[31]  Shuangye Yin,et al.  Fast screening of protein surfaces using geometric invariant fingerprints , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  Wen-Hsiung Li,et al.  SplitPocket: identification of protein functional surfaces and characterization of their spatial patterns , 2009, Nucleic Acids Res..

[33]  Thomas E. Ferrin,et al.  Using Sequence Similarity Networks for Visualization of Relationships Across Diverse Protein Superfamilies , 2009, PloS one.

[34]  Bin Li,et al.  Characterization of local geometry of protein surfaces with the visibility criterion , 2008, Proteins.

[35]  Janet M Thornton,et al.  Towards fully automated structure-based function prediction in structural genomics: a case study. , 2007, Journal of molecular biology.

[36]  Janusz M Bujnicki,et al.  SURF’s UP! — Protein classification by surface comparisons , 2007, Journal of Biosciences.

[37]  Iddo Friedberg,et al.  Automated protein function predictionçthe genomic challenge , 2006 .

[38]  R. Kolodny,et al.  Protein structure comparison: implications for the nature of 'fold space', and structure and function prediction. , 2006, Current opinion in structural biology.

[39]  N. Gold,et al.  Fold independent structural comparisons of protein-ligand binding sites for exploring functional relationships. , 2006, Journal of molecular biology.

[40]  Ruth Nussinov,et al.  SiteEngines: recognition and comparison of binding sites and protein–protein interfaces , 2005, Nucleic Acids Res..

[41]  Ozlem Keskin,et al.  Prediction of protein-protein interactions by combining structure and sequence conservation in protein interfaces , 2005, Bioinform..

[42]  J. Thornton,et al.  Predicting protein function from sequence and structural data. , 2005, Current opinion in structural biology.

[43]  Rachel Kolodny,et al.  Comprehensive evaluation of protein structure alignment methods: scoring by geometric measures. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[44]  Antonina Silkov,et al.  Structural alignment of protein--DNA interfaces: insights into the determinants of binding specificity. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[45]  S. Vajda,et al.  Anchor residues in protein-protein interactions. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[46]  Adam Godzik,et al.  FATCAT: a web server for flexible structure comparison and structure similarity searching , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[47]  Ruth Nussinov,et al.  A method for simultaneous alignment of multiple protein structures , 2004, Proteins.

[48]  K. Sneppen,et al.  Specificity and Stability in Topology of Protein Networks , 2002, Science.

[49]  Liisa Holm,et al.  DaliLite workbench for protein structure comparison , 2000, Bioinform..

[50]  Tim J. P. Hubbard,et al.  SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database , 1998, Nucleic Acids Res..

[51]  P E Bourne,et al.  Protein structure alignment by incremental combinatorial extension (CE) of the optimal path. , 1998, Protein engineering.

[52]  F. Cohen,et al.  An evolutionary trace method defines binding surfaces common to protein families. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[53]  Herbert Edelsbrunner,et al.  Three-dimensional alpha shapes , 1992, VVS.

[54]  W. Kabsch,et al.  Dictionary of protein secondary structure: Pattern recognition of hydrogen‐bonded and geometrical features , 1983, Biopolymers.

[55]  H. B. Mann,et al.  On a Test of Whether one of Two Random Variables is Stochastically Larger than the Other , 1947 .

[56]  Wonpil Im,et al.  G-LoSA for Prediction of Protein-Ligand Binding Sites and Structures. , 2017, Methods in molecular biology.

[57]  Hong Yan,et al.  Alpha shape and Delaunay triangulation in studies of protein-related interactions , 2014, Briefings Bioinform..

[58]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Favorable scaffolds: proteins with different sequence, structure and function may associate in similar ways. , 2005, Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS.

[59]  J. Dunn.  Well-Separated Clusters and Optimal Fuzzy Partitions , 1974 .

[60]  Ying Gao,et al.  Bioinformatics Applications Note Sequence Analysis Cd-hit Suite: a Web Server for Clustering and Comparing Biological Sequences , 2022 .