A proposed framework for feature‐level geospatial data sharing: a case study for transportation network data

Current data sharing in the Internet environment is supported using metadata at the file level. This approach has three fundamental shortcomings. First, sharing data from different sources with different semantics, data models, and acquisition methods usually requires data conversion and/or integration like data conflation. This can be tedious and error‐prone. Second, data updated from one source cannot be automatically propagated to other related data or applications. Finally, data sharing at the file level makes it difficult to provide feature‐level data for searching, accessing, and exchanging in real time over the Internet. This paper addresses these three issues by proposing a standards‐based framework for sharing geospatial data in the transportation application domain. The proposed framework uses a standard data model—geospatial data model proposed by the Geospatial One‐Stop initiative to harmonize the semantics and data models without the use of data integration methods. It uses Geography Markup Language (GML) for geospatial data coding and feature relationship, which provides a basis to propagate the data update from one source to related other sources and applications, and to search and extract data at the feature level. The framework uses the Web Feature Service (WFS) to search, access and extract data at the feature level from distributed sources. Finally, the Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) standard was used for data display on the Web browser. Two transportation network datasets are used in the prototype case study to implement the proposed framework. The prototype allows the user to access and extract data at the feature level on the Web from distributed sources without downloading the full data file. It shows that the proposed standards‐based feature‐level data‐sharing system is capable of sharing data without data conflation, accessing, and exchanging data in real time at the feature level. The prototype also shows that changes in one database can be automatically reflected or propagated in another related database without data downloading.

[1]  Teresa M Adams,et al.  GUIDELINES FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION LOCATION REFERENCING SYSTEMS , 2001 .

[2]  Steve Carver Public Participation Using Web-Based GIS , 2001 .

[3]  Stefano Spaccapietra,et al.  On Spatial Database Integration , 1998, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[4]  Andrew U. Frank,et al.  Tiers of ontology and consistency constraints in geographical information systems , 2001, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[5]  Robin G. Fegeas,et al.  An Overview of FIPS 173, The Spatial Data Transfer Standard , 1992 .

[6]  David M. Mark,et al.  Geographical categories: an ontological investigation , 2001, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[7]  Harlan J. Onsrud,et al.  Sharing geographic information , 1995 .

[8]  Zhong-Ren Peng,et al.  The roles of geography markup language (GML), scalable vector graphics (SVG), and Web feature service (WFS) specifications in the development of Internet geographic information systems (GIS) , 2004, J. Geogr. Syst..

[9]  Barbara P. Buttenfield,et al.  An Agent-based, Global User Interface for Distributed Geographic Information Services , 1998 .

[10]  K S Opiela A GENERIC DATA MODEL FOR LINEAR REFERENCING SYSTEMS , 1997 .

[11]  Joan Slottow,et al.  Distributing proprietary geographic data on the World Wide Web: UCLA GIS database and map server , 2000 .

[12]  Ray Bert Book Review: \IInternet GIS: Distributed Geographic Information Systems for the Internet and Wireless Networks\N by Zhong-Ren Peng and Ming-Hsiang Tsou. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2003 , 2003 .

[13]  Isabel F. Cruz,et al.  Handling semantic heterogeneities using declarative agreements , 2002, GIS '02.

[14]  Peter Clayton,et al.  Research Article: Dynamic run-time application development using CORBA objects and XML in the field of distributed GIS , 2003, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[15]  David Medyckyj-Scott,et al.  Discovering Environmental Data: Metadatabases, Network Information Resource Tools and the GENIE System , 1996, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[16]  David J. Abel,et al.  An exploration of GIS architectures for Internet environments , 1998 .

[17]  Frederick E. Petry,et al.  A Rule-based Approach for the Conflation of Attributed Vector Data , 1998, GeoInformatica.

[18]  Kimberly C. Kowal Tapping the Web for GIS and mapping technologies: For all levels of libraries and users , 2002 .

[19]  Kenneth J. Dueker,et al.  A GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM FRAMEWORK FOR TRANSPORTATION DATA SHARING , 2000 .

[20]  Werner Kuhn,et al.  Modeling the Semantics of Geographic Categories through Conceptual Integration , 2002, GIScience.

[21]  Harold Moellering Opportunities for Use of the Spatial Data Transfer Standard at the State and Local Level , 1992 .

[22]  Werner Kuhn,et al.  Semantic interoperability: A central issue for sharing geographic information , 1999 .

[23]  K J Dueker,et al.  GIS-T ENTERPRISE DATA MODEL WITH SUGGESTED IMPLEMENTATION CHOICES , 1997 .

[24]  Hardy Pundt,et al.  Domain ontologies for data sharing-an example from environmental monitoring using field GIS , 2002 .

[25]  Kenneth J. Dueker,et al.  A Clearinghouse Approach to Sharing Transportation GIS Data , 2000 .

[26]  Kenneth J. Dueker,et al.  Clearinghouse Approach to Sharing Geographic Information Systems-Transportation Data , 2001 .

[27]  Zhong-ren Peng,et al.  Internet GIS: Distributed Geographic Information Services for the Internet and Wireless Networks , 2003 .

[28]  Frederico T. Fonseca,et al.  From Geo- to Eco-ontologies , 2002, GIScience.

[29]  Alia I. Abdelmoty,et al.  Towards maintaining consistency of spatial databases , 1997, CIKM '97.

[30]  Kenneth J. Dueker,et al.  White Paper on Issues and Strategies for Building a State Transportation Framework , 2002 .