Practices and obstetric interventions in women from a state in the Northeast of Brazil.

OBJECTIVE To describe practices and interventions used during labor and childbirth and factors associated with such practices in puerperae in the state of Sergipe. METHOD A cross-sectional study with 768 postpartum women from 11 maternity hospitals interviewed 6 hours after delivery, and hospital records review. The associations between best practices and interventions used during labor and delivery with exposure variables were described using simple frequencies, percentages, crude and adjusted odds ratio (ORa) with the confidence interval. RESULTS Of the women in the study, 10.6% received food and 27.8% moved during labor; non-pharmacological methods for pain relief were performed in 26.1%; a partogram was filled in 39.4% of the charts; and an accompanying person was present in 40.6% of deliveries. Oxytocin, amniotomy and labor analgesia were used in 59.1%, 49.3% and 4.2% of women, respectively. Lithotomy position during childbirth was used in 95.2% of the cases, episiotomy in 43.9% and Kristeller maneuver in 31.7%. The variables most associated with cesarean section were private financing (ORa=4.27, 95CI 2.44-7.47), higher levels of education (ORa=4.54, 95CI 2.56-8.3) and high obstetric risk (ORa=1.9, 95CI 1.31-2.74). Women whose delivery was funded privately were more likely to have an accompanying person present (ORa=2.12, 95CI 1.18-3.79) and to undergo labor analgesia (ORa=4.96, 95CI 1.7-14.5). CONCLUSION Best practices are poorly performed and unnecessary interventions are frequent. The factors most associated with c-section were private funding, greater length of education and high obstetric risk.

[1]  C. Bedwell,et al.  A realist review of the partograph: when and how does it work for labour monitoring? , 2017, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.

[2]  Zhanchun Feng,et al.  The Costs and Their Determinant of Cesarean Section and Vaginal Delivery: An Exploratory Study in Chongqing Municipality, China , 2016, BioMed research international.

[3]  M. Canteras-Jordana,et al.  Episiotomy and its relationship to various clinical variables that influence its performance , 2016, Revista latino-americana de enfermagem.

[4]  G. Zararsiz,et al.  The effect of Kristeller maneuver on maternal and neonatal outcome , 2015 .

[5]  M. Amorim,et al.  Risk factors for episiotomy: a case-control study , 2014 .

[6]  P. N. Silva,et al.  Sampling design for the Birth in Brazil: National Survey into Labor and Birth. , 2014, Cadernos de saude publica.

[7]  E. d’Orsi,et al.  Implementation of the presence of companions during hospital admission for childbirth: data from the Birth in Brazil national survey. , 2014, Cadernos de saude publica.

[8]  K. Hopkins,et al.  The impact of payment source and hospital type on rising cesarean section rates in Brazil, 1998 to 2008. , 2014, Birth.

[9]  H. Dahlen,et al.  Rates of obstetric intervention and associated perinatal mortality and morbidity among low-risk women giving birth in private and public hospitals in NSW (2000–2008): a linked data population-based cohort study , 2014, BMJ Open.

[10]  Joanna White,et al.  Obstetric interventions in two groups of hospitals in Catalonia: a cross-sectional study , 2014, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.

[11]  Vitor Hugo Simon,et al.  SEPARATION PHENOMENA LOGISTIC REGRESSION , 2014 .

[12]  S. Arouca Obstetric interventions during labor and childbirth in Brazilian low-risk women , 2014 .

[13]  L. Lewis,et al.  Maternal positions and mobility during first stage labour , 2011, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[14]  G. Gyte,et al.  Restricting oral fluid and food intake during labour. , 2013, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[15]  R. Smyth,et al.  Amniotomy for shortening spontaneous labour. , 2013, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[16]  E. Hodnett,et al.  Continuous support for women during childbirth. , 2013, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[17]  V. Carvalho,et al.  Como os trabalhadores de um Centro Obstétrico justificam a utilização de práticas prejudiciais ao parto normal , 2012 .

[18]  Josefine Busanello,et al.  [How the workers of a birthing center justify using harmful practices in natural childbirth]. , 2012, Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P.

[19]  Postgraduate Professors Combined spinal-epidural anesthesia and non-pharmacological methods of pain relief during normal childbirth and maternal satisfaction: a randomized clinical trial , 2012 .

[20]  G. Kac,et al.  High cesarean prevalence in a national population‐based study in Brazil: the role of private practice , 2010, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[21]  Cynthia Coelho Medeiros de Carvalho,et al.  Prevalência e fatores associados à prática da episiotomia em maternidade escola do Recife, Pernambuco, Brasil , 2010 .

[22]  Olímpio Barbosa Moraes Filho,et al.  [Prevalence and factors associated with practice of episiotomy at a maternity school in Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil]. , 2010, Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira.

[23]  S. Chauhan,et al.  Evidence-based labor and delivery management. , 2019, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[24]  M. Leal,et al.  [The decision of women for cesarean birth: a case study in two units of the supplementary health care system of the State of Rio de Janeiro]. , 2008, Ciencia & saude coletiva.

[25]  J. Potter,et al.  Unwanted caesarean sections among public and private patients in Brazil: prospective study , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[26]  G. Carroli,et al.  Episiotomy for vaginal birth. , 1999, Birth.