Evaluation of a Portable Collision Warning Device for Patients With Peripheral Vision Loss in an Obstacle Course.

PURPOSE A pocket-sized collision warning device equipped with a video camera was developed to predict impending collisions based on time to collision rather than proximity. A study was conducted in a high-density obstacle course to evaluate the effect of the device on collision avoidance in people with peripheral field loss (PFL). METHODS The 41-meter-long loop-shaped obstacle course consisted of 46 stationary obstacles from floor to head level and oncoming pedestrians. Twenty-five patients with tunnel vision (n = 13) or hemianopia (n = 12) completed four consecutive loops with and without the device, while not using any other habitual mobility aid. Walking direction and device usage order were counterbalanced. Number of collisions and preferred percentage of walking speed (PPWS) were compared within subjects. RESULTS Collisions were reduced significantly by approximately 37% (P < 0.001) with the device (floor-level obstacles were excluded because the device was not designed for them). No patient had more collisions when using the device. Although the PPWS were also reduced with the device from 52% to 49% (P = 0.053), this did not account for the lower number of collisions, as the changes in collisions and PPWS were not correlated (P = 0.516). CONCLUSIONS The device may help patients with a wide range of PFL avoid collisions with high-level obstacles while barely affecting their walking speed.

[1]  Gang Luo,et al.  Evaluation of a prototype Minified Augmented‐View device for patients with impaired night vision * , 2004, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[2]  H Alm,et al.  The effects of a mobile telephone task on driver behaviour in a car following situation. , 1995, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[3]  Valdimar Briem,et al.  Behavioural effects of mobile telephone use during simulated driving. , 1995 .

[4]  Manjunatha Mahadevappa,et al.  Design, Development, and Clinical Evaluation of the Electronic Mobility Cane for Vision Rehabilitation , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[5]  Jan E Lovie-Kitchin,et al.  Visual Function, Visual Attention, and Mobility Performance in Low Vision , 2008, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[6]  Gert Jan Gelderblom,et al.  The Development of an Indoor Mobility Course for the Evaluation of Electronic Mobility Aids for Persons Who Are Visually Impaired , 2012, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[7]  T Pey,et al.  Visual loss and falls: a review , 2010, Eye.

[8]  Daniel B Wright,et al.  Graphing within-subjects confidence intervals using SPSS and S-Plus , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[9]  Gert Jan Gelderblom,et al.  User Evaluation of Two Electronic Mobility Aids for Persons Who Are Visually Impaired: A Quasi-Experimental Study Using a Standardized Mobility Course , 2012, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[10]  Stacey George,et al.  Vision-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Complete Homonymous Hemianopia Post Stroke , 2009, Topics in stroke rehabilitation.

[11]  Karen Bandeen-Roche,et al.  Divided visual attention as a predictor of bumping while walking: the Salisbury Eye Evaluation. , 2004, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[12]  S. Azen,et al.  Central and peripheral visual impairment and the risk of falls and falls with injury. , 2010, Ophthalmology.

[13]  B. Munoz,et al.  Visual field loss increases the risk of falls in older adults: the Salisbury eye evaluation. , 2007, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[14]  Nikolaos G. Bourbakis,et al.  Wearable Obstacle Avoidance Electronic Travel Aids for Blind: A Survey , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews).

[15]  Shrinivas J. Pundlik,et al.  Collision Detection for Visually Impaired from a Body-Mounted Camera , 2013, 2013 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops.

[16]  Luis Miguel Bergasa,et al.  Assisting the Visually Impaired: Obstacle Detection and Warning System by Acoustic Feedback , 2012, Sensors.

[17]  Celia S. Chen,et al.  Functional improvements following the use of the NVT Vision Rehabilitation program for patients with hemianopia following stroke. , 2012, NeuroRehabilitation.

[18]  Eli Peli,et al.  DLP-based dichoptic vision test system. , 2010, Journal of biomedical optics.

[19]  S. Haymes,et al.  Mobility of People with Retinitis Pigmentosa as a Function of Vision and Psychological Variables , 1996, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[20]  B. Munoz,et al.  Association of Visual Field Loss and Mobility Performance in Older Adults: Salisbury Eye Evaluation Study , 2004, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[21]  Shrinivas J. Pundlik,et al.  Time to Collision and Collision Risk Estimation from Local Scale and Motion , 2011, ISVC.

[22]  J. L. Elliott,et al.  Visual Correlates of Obstacle Avoidance in Adults with Low Vision , 1998, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[23]  T. Kuyk,et al.  Environmental variables and mobility performance in adults with low vision. , 1996, Journal of the American Optometric Association.

[24]  Eric Horvitz,et al.  Cars, calls, and cognition: investigating driving and divided attention , 2010, CHI.

[25]  Shirin E. Hassan,et al.  Visual Field Size Criteria for Mobility Rehabilitation Referral , 2010, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[26]  Peter B. L. Meijer,et al.  An experimental system for auditory image representations , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[27]  Tom Troscianko,et al.  Mobility performance of low‐vision adults using an electronic mobility aid , 2006, Clinical & experimental optometry.

[28]  M. Masson,et al.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[29]  Gérard G. Medioni,et al.  Robot vision for the visually impaired , 2010, 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition - Workshops.

[30]  Fei Yu,et al.  Binocular Visual‐Field Loss Increases the Risk of Future Falls in Older White Women , 2007, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.