Alternate methods and software for calculating interobserver agreement for continuous observation data

Portable electronic data collection devices permit investigators to collect large amounts of observational data in a form ready for computer analysis. These devices are particularly efficient for gathering continuous data on multiple behavior categories. We expect that the increasing availability of these devices will lead to greater use of continuous data collection methods in observational research. This paper addresses the difficulties encountered when calculating traditional interobserver agreement statistics for continuous, multiple-code scoring. Two alternative strategies are described that yield interobserver agreement values based on the exact time of behavior code entries by the primary and secondary observers.

[1]  D P Hartmann,et al.  Considerations in the choice of interobserver reliability estimates. , 1977, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[2]  Rob Sanson-Fisher,et al.  Data acquisition in real time—An improved system for naturalistic observations , 1979 .

[3]  Richard Deni,et al.  BASIC programs for observational research using the TRS-80 Model 100 portable and Model 4 computers , 1983 .

[4]  B. Everitt,et al.  Large sample standard errors of kappa and weighted kappa. , 1969 .

[5]  B. Wampold,et al.  A note on interobserver reliability for sequential data , 1983 .

[6]  Gene P. Sackett,et al.  Digital data acquisition systems for observing behavior in laboratory and field settings , 1973 .

[7]  T. Kratochwill,et al.  Observer agreement, credibility, and judgment: some considerations in presenting observer agreement data. , 1977, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[8]  Jacob Cohen A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .

[9]  A. Kazdin,et al.  Artifact, bias, and complexity of assessment: the ABCs of reliability. , 1977, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[10]  B. Wildman,et al.  A probability-based formula for calculating interobserver agreement. , 1977, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[11]  G R Patterson,et al.  Naturalistic observation in clinical assessment , 1977, Journal of abnormal child psychology.

[12]  D M Baer,et al.  Reviewer's comment: just because it's reliable doesn't mean that you can use it. , 1977, Journal of applied behavior analysis.