Comparison of Statistical Indicators for the Automatic Detection of 80 Hz Auditory Steady State Responses

Objective: To evaluate, using receiver operation characteristic (ROC) curves, the performance of several statistical indicators in the objective detection of 80 Hz steady state auditory evoked responses. Design: Steady state auditory evoked responses elicited by amplitude modulated tones of 500 and 1000 Hz, were obtained in 16 normal adults. Recordings were made at intensities ranging from 80 to 30 dB SPL and without stimulation. Four statistics: coherence synchrony measure, circularT2, a new variant of Hotelling T2(labeled HT2) and a test for hidden periodicity (F test) were calculated. The statistics were compared using ROC curves and bootstrapping techniques. Two outcome measures were considered: behavioral threshold prediction and averaging efficiency. Results: All indicators were highly accurate to detect a response (8 to 9 dB above mean behavioral threshold for the 1000 Hz and 14 to 16 dB for the 500 Hz carrier). Responses could be reliable detected after averaging about five individual epochs of long duration. No statistically significant differences were evidenced though in their capability to predict behavioral threshold or their averaging efficiency. Conclusions: Despite the more adequate statistical properties of some of these indicators no significant differences were found in their performance. Thus all of these indicators could be recommended for automatic detection of 80 Hz auditory steady state responses.

[1]  S Makeig,et al.  Auditory steady-state responses: threshold prediction using phase coherence. , 1987, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[2]  G M Clark,et al.  Auditory steady-state evoked potential in newborns. , 1994, British journal of audiology.

[3]  R. Massof,et al.  Criterion-free parameter-free distribution-independent index of diagnostic test performance. , 1987, Applied optics.

[4]  Terence W. Picton,et al.  Frequency‐Specific Audiometry Using Steady‐State Responses , 1996, Ear and hearing.

[5]  Zurek Pm,et al.  Detectability of transient and sinusoidal otoacoustic emissions. , 1992 .

[6]  G M Clark,et al.  A comparison of steady-state evoked potentials to modulated tones in awake and sleeping humans. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  T W Picton,et al.  Auditory steady-state responses to tones amplitude-modulated at 80-110 Hz. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  R A Dobie,et al.  Objective Response Detection , 1993, Ear and hearing.

[9]  P. Hall Theoretical Comparison of Bootstrap Confidence Intervals , 1988 .

[10]  J. Victor,et al.  A new statistic for steady-state evoked potentials. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[11]  R A Dobie,et al.  Objective response detection in the frequency domain. , 1993, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[12]  J A Swets,et al.  Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. , 1988, Science.

[13]  D. Tucci,et al.  Coherence analysis of scalp responses to amplitude-modulated tones. , 1990, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[14]  D. McClish Analyzing a Portion of the ROC Curve , 1989, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[15]  R. Dobie,et al.  Amplitude-modulation following response (AMFR): Effects of modulation rate, carrier frequency, age, and state , 1993, Hearing Research.

[16]  Terence W. Picton,et al.  Auditory steady-state responses to multiple simultaneous stimuli , 1995 .

[17]  P. Valdés-Sosa,et al.  Detection of event related potentials. , 1989, The International journal of neuroscience.

[18]  Masaru Aoyagi,et al.  Optimal modulation frequency for amplitude-modulation following response in young children during sleep , 1993, Hearing Research.

[19]  T W Picton,et al.  Potentials evoked by the sinusoidal modulation of the amplitude or frequency of a tone. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  R A Dobie,et al.  Analysis of auditory evoked potentials by magnitude-squared coherence. , 1989, Ear and hearing.

[21]  T W Picton,et al.  Reliability estimates for steady-state evoked potentials. , 1987, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[22]  Shigeyuki Kuwada,et al.  Scalp potentials of normal and hearing-impaired subjects in response to sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones , 1986, Hearing Research.

[23]  M A Bobes,et al.  Comparison of auditory-evoked potential detection methods using signal detection theory. , 1987, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.