Gravitationally Induced Entanglement between Two Massive Particles is Sufficient Evidence of Quantum Effects in Gravity.

All existing quantum-gravity proposals are extremely hard to test in practice. Quantum effects in the gravitational field are exceptionally small, unlike those in the electromagnetic field. The fundamental reason is that the gravitational coupling constant is about 43 orders of magnitude smaller than the fine structure constant, which governs light-matter interactions. For example, detecting gravitons-the hypothetical quanta of the gravitational field predicted by certain quantum-gravity proposals-is deemed to be practically impossible. Here we adopt a radically different, quantum-information-theoretic approach to testing quantum gravity. We propose witnessing quantumlike features in the gravitational field, by probing it with two masses each in a superposition of two locations. First, we prove that any system (e.g., a field) mediating entanglement between two quantum systems must be quantum. This argument is general and does not rely on any specific dynamics. Then, we propose an experiment to detect the entanglement generated between two masses via gravitational interaction. By our argument, the degree of entanglement between the masses is a witness of the field quantization. This experiment does not require any quantum control over gravity. It is also closer to realization than detecting gravitons or detecting quantum gravitational vacuum fluctuations.

[1]  H. V. Borzeszkowski,et al.  The meaning of quantum gravity , 1987 .

[2]  M. Lewenstein,et al.  Quantum Entanglement , 2020, Quantum Mechanics.

[3]  C. Isham Structural issues in quantum gravity , 1995, gr-qc/9510063.

[4]  M. Kasevich,et al.  Phase Shift in an Atom Interferometer due to Spacetime Curvature across its Wave Function. , 2017, Physical review letters.

[5]  Lajos Diósi,et al.  A universal master equation for the gravitational violation of quantum mechanics , 1987 .

[6]  L. Vaidman Role of potentials in the Aharonov-Bohm effect , 2011, 1110.6169.

[7]  Vlatko Vedral,et al.  Witness gravity’s quantum side in the lab , 2017, Nature.

[8]  Pauls,et al.  The shape of the first collapsed objects. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[9]  R. Rosenfeld Nature , 2009, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[10]  Reza Mansouri,et al.  General Relativity and Gravitation: A Centennial Perspective , 2015 .

[11]  Claus Kiefer,et al.  Conceptual Problems in Quantum Gravity and Quantum Cosmology , 2013, 1401.3578.

[12]  A. Sakharov Vacuum Quantum Fluctuations in Curved Space and the Theory of Gravitation , 2000 .

[13]  October I Physical Review Letters , 2022 .

[14]  Thomas Hellman PHIL , 2018, Encantado.

[15]  Daniel Rohrlich,et al.  A self-interfering clock as a “which path” witness , 2015, Science.

[16]  T. Kibble Geometrization of quantum mechanics , 1979 .

[17]  Caslav Brukner,et al.  Universal decoherence due to gravitational time dilation , 2013, Nature Physics.

[18]  S. A. Werner,et al.  Observation of Gravitationally Induced Quantum Interference , 1975 .

[19]  Mauro Paternostro,et al.  Revealing non-classicality of unmeasured objects , 2016 .

[20]  M. Blencowe,et al.  Damping and decoherence of a nanomechanical resonator due to a few two-level systems , 2009, 0907.0431.

[21]  Tony Rothman,et al.  Aspects of graviton detection: graviton emission and absorption by atomic hydrogen , 2006, gr-qc/0605052.

[22]  Mauro Paternostro,et al.  Spin Entanglement Witness for Quantum Gravity. , 2017, Physical review letters.

[23]  R. Penrose On Gravity's role in Quantum State Reduction , 1996 .

[24]  Jacob M. Taylor,et al.  A classical channel model for gravitational decoherence , 2014, 1401.0946.

[25]  V. Sudhir,et al.  Measurement-based control of a mechanical oscillator at its thermal decoherence rate , 2014, Nature.

[26]  D. Ahluwalia,et al.  Interplay of gravitation and linear superposition of different mass eigenstates , 1998, gr-qc/9803013.

[27]  Prasanta K. Panigrahi,et al.  Timelike curves can increase entanglement with LOCC , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[28]  Stephen A. Fulling The Global Approach to Quantum Field Theory , 2006 .

[29]  John Corcoran,et al.  String theory , 1974, Journal of Symbolic Logic.

[30]  Gebräuchliche Fertigarzneimittel,et al.  V , 1893, Therapielexikon Neurologie.

[31]  Tony Rothman,et al.  Can Gravitons be Detected? , 2006 .

[32]  C. Ross Found , 1869, The Dental register.

[33]  F. Károlyházy,et al.  Gravitation and quantum mechanics of macroscopic objects , 1966 .

[34]  Anton Zeilinger,et al.  Wave–particle duality of C60 molecules , 1999, Nature.

[35]  Mauro Paternostro,et al.  Revealing Nonclassicality of Inaccessible Objects. , 2016, Physical review letters.

[36]  P. Cochat,et al.  Et al , 2008, Archives de pediatrie : organe officiel de la Societe francaise de pediatrie.

[37]  Antonio-José Almeida,et al.  NAT , 2019, Springer Reference Medizin.

[38]  A. R. Prasanna Ninth International Conference on General Relativity and Gravitation , 1978 .

[39]  P. Stamp Environmental decoherence versus intrinsic decoherence , 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.