Control-Oriented Design Using Surrogate-Based Optimization and Existence Conditions for Robust Performance

M ISSION capability of a vehicle is ultimately evaluated by closed-loop performance. Such capability depends on a synergistic integration of aerodynamics, structures, propulsion, and control, which results in flight dynamics that are optimal for the mission. Unfortunately, most systems such as aircraft are traditionally designed using a sequential series of open-loop optimizations that cannot account for, or optimize, any synergistic integrations. A formulation for design that inherently considers control must therefore be developed to enable optimal closed-loop performance. The issue of cost function is actually quite critical to the inclusion of control synthesis for design optimization. Every discipline has metrics that are unique to their objectives, so a single cost that encompasses all these metrics can be challenging to formulate. One approach that considers vibration control uses norms, both for vibration level and effort, as a cost in a linear-quadratic framework [1]. A mixed-norm approach is formulated that considers both H2 andH1 in summation to represent independent metrics of the design [2]. A positive-real condition across frequency is also introduced as a cost that has time-domain interpretations for design [3]. Several formulations formulate cost functions and solution methodologies for designs that include linear matrix inequalities (LMIs) associated with H1-norm synthesis. One generates a nonconvex formulation and uses iterations to solve the associated optimization [4]. Another approximates functions associated with perturbed state-spacematrices as LMIs to be solved using an iterative approach [5]. A two-step procedure is used for an optimization coupled with an LMI solver for the controller [6] as an multidisciplinary optimization approach. Another approach considers an iterative sequential control design and a coupled redesign with each iteration involving the solution of an LMI [7]. This Note introduces a control-oriented approach for design that avoids the common difficulties of simultaneous structure-control design, which is known to be nonconvex [8–11]. The approach actually considers an existence question that notes if a controller exists for a given structure that achieves a desired level of performance. The approach does not design both the structure and control to optimize a closed-loop norm; rather, it designs a structure for which a controller exists that optimizes a closed-loop norm. Formulations using control synthesis to minimize an H1-norm metric and anH2-norm are derived using their appropriate existence conditions. As important, a solution methodology is used based on surrogate modeling to avoid the iterations and expensive computations associated with techniques doing design with LMI expressions. The surrogate-based optimization is shown to be efficient and effective and exploring a design space to optimize the closed-loop metric.

[1]  T. Simpson,et al.  Use of Kriging Models to Approximate Deterministic Computer Models , 2005 .

[2]  R. J. Niewoehner,et al.  Integrated aircraft-controller design using linear matrix inequalities , 1996 .

[3]  Donald R. Jones,et al.  Efficient Global Optimization of Expensive Black-Box Functions , 1998, J. Glob. Optim..

[4]  Robert E. Skelton,et al.  An algorithm for integrated structure and control design with variance bounds , 1996, Proceedings of 35th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[5]  Roger Woodard,et al.  Interpolation of Spatial Data: Some Theory for Kriging , 1999, Technometrics.

[6]  Achille Messac,et al.  Control-Structure Integrated Design , 1992 .

[7]  Michael A. Bolender,et al.  Modeling Unsteady Heating Effects on the Structural Dynamics of a Hypersonic Vehicle , 2006 .

[8]  K. Grigoriadis,et al.  Integrated design of structural and control systems with a homotopy like iterative method , 2005, Proceedings of the 2005, American Control Conference, 2005..

[9]  Karolos M. Grigoriadis,et al.  Integrated structural and control design for vector second-order systems via LMIs , 1998, Proceedings of the 1998 American Control Conference. ACC (IEEE Cat. No.98CH36207).

[10]  Thomas J. Santner,et al.  The Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments , 2003, Springer Series in Statistics.

[11]  Toshiharu Sugie,et al.  General framework and BMI formulae for simultaneous design of structure and control systems , 1997, Proceedings of the 36th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[12]  Michael A. Bolender,et al.  A Non-Linear Model for the Longitudinal Dynamics of a Hypersonic Air-breathing Vehicle , 2005 .

[13]  Rick Lind,et al.  Linear Parameter-Varying Modeling and Control of Structural Dynamics with Aerothermoelastic Effects , 1999 .

[14]  Jack P. C. Kleijnen,et al.  Kriging Metamodeling in Simulation: A Review , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[15]  Shinji Hara,et al.  Structure/control design integration with finite frequency positive real property , 2000, Proceedings of the 2000 American Control Conference. ACC (IEEE Cat. No.00CH36334).

[16]  Jianbo Lu,et al.  Integrating structure and control design to achieve mixed H2/H performance , 2000 .

[17]  Raphael T. Haftka,et al.  Surrogate-based Analysis and Optimization , 2005 .

[18]  K. Goh,et al.  Control system synthesis via bilinear matrix inequalities , 1994, Proceedings of 1994 American Control Conference - ACC '94.

[19]  Walter C. Engelund,et al.  Aerothermoelastic analysis of a NASP demonstrator model , 1993 .

[20]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments in Multidisciplinary Design Optimization: A Review of How Far We Have Come - Or Not , 2008 .

[21]  Pierre Apkarian,et al.  Low nonconvexity-rank bilinear matrix inequalities: algorithms and applications in robust controller and structure designs , 2000, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[22]  Michael G. Gilbert,et al.  Active Control of Aerothermoelastic Effects for a Conceptual Hypersonic Aircraft , 1990 .

[23]  David B. Doman,et al.  Nonlinear Longitudinal Dynamical Model of an Air-Breathing Hypersonic Vehicle , 2007 .

[24]  David B. Doman,et al.  A Flexible Hypersonic Vehicle Model Developed With Piston Theory (Preprint) , 2006 .

[25]  Itsuro Kajiwara,et al.  Integrated Design of Aerodynamics and Control System for Micro Air Vehicles , 2000 .

[26]  Sonja Kuhnt,et al.  Design and analysis of computer experiments , 2010 .