An Innovative Near-Peer Mentoring Model for Undergraduate and Secondary Students: STEM Focus

This study examined a novel mentoring model, near-peer mentorship, that supports the development of mentee and mentor, incorporates established principles of mentoring, and offers unique opportunities to integrate research and teaching in a science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) internship. Using qualitative methods, this model was examined from the perspectives of near-peer mentors and student mentees during a science education internship at the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research. Results revealed that this mentorship model contributed to personal, educational, and professional growth for near-peer mentors and increased the interest and engagement of students studying STEM. We discuss implications, limitations, and future directions.

[1]  S. Durning,et al.  Student teaching: views of student near-peer teachers and learners , 2007, Medical teacher.

[2]  Susan H. Russell,et al.  Benefits of Undergraduate Research Experiences , 2007, Science.

[3]  David F. Feldon,et al.  Graduate Students’ Teaching Experiences Improve Their Methodological Research Skills , 2011, Science.

[4]  B. Hallar,et al.  Advancing Diversity in STEM , 2011 .

[5]  Ann Bessenbacher,et al.  Research and Teaching: Understanding How Undergraduate Research Experiences Influence Student Aspirations for Research Careers and Graduate Education. , 2012 .

[6]  Lillian T. Eby,et al.  The state of mentoring research: A qualitative review of current research methods and future research implications , 2008 .

[7]  Troy D. Sadler,et al.  Scientific Research for Undergraduate Students: A Review of the Literature. , 2010 .

[8]  E. Athanassoula.  Theoretical perspectives. , 1996, Occasional paper.

[9]  Anne-Barrie Hunter,et al.  What Experiences Help Students Become Scientists? A Comparative Study of Research and other Sources of Personal and Professional Gains for STEM Undergraduates , 2011 .

[10]  Barbara K. Goza,et al.  The role of efficacy and identity in science career commitment among underrepresented minority students , 2011 .

[11]  Andrew Shouse,et al.  Learning science in informal environments : people, places, and pursuits , 2009 .

[12]  Weaving Together Undergraduate Research, Mentoring of Junior Faculty, and Assessment: The Case of an Interdisciplinary Program , 2008 .

[13]  Sheng-Jen Hsieh.  Research Experiences for Undergraduate Engineering Students , 2013 .

[14]  Heather Thiry,et al.  The Role of Student-Advisor Interactions in Apprenticing Undergraduate Researchers into a Scientific Community of Practice , 2011 .

[15]  Ann M Bessenbacher,et al.  Understanding How Undergraduate Research Experiences Influence Student Aspirations for Research Careers and Graduate Education , 2012 .

[16]  Rasha Hammamieh,et al.  Students investigating the antiproliferative effects of synthesized drugs on mouse mammary tumor cells. , 2005, Cell biology education.

[17]  Erin L. Dolan,et al.  Toward a Holistic View of Undergraduate Research Experiences: An Exploratory Study of Impact on Graduate/Postdoctoral Mentors , 2009 .

[18]  J. Barondess.  A brief history of mentoring. , 1995, Transactions of the American Clinical and Climatological Association.

[19]  B. Nastasi,et al.  Contributions of qualitative research to the validity of intervention research , 2005 .

[20]  Jenepher Lennox Terrion,et al.  A taxonomy of the characteristics of student peer mentors in higher education: findings from a literature review , 2007 .

[21]  M. Jewett,et al.  Human HIF‐3α4 is a dominant‐negative regulator of HIF‐1 and is down‐regulated in renal cell carcinoma , 2005 .

[22]  R. Eric Landrum,et al.  The Undergraduate Research Assistantship: An Analysis of the Benefits , 2002 .