Giving voice to the silent: a framework for understanding stakeholders’ participation in socially-oriented initiatives, community-based actions and humanitarian operations projects

Under the umbrella of compassionate operations management theory (Sarkis, in Int J Prod Econ 139(2):359–365, 2012) and stakeholder theory, the aim of this article is to propose a comprehensive framework to unlock stakeholders’ voice in socially-oriented projects (for example, social responsibility, community and humanitarian projects). The framework developed in this work aims to assist managers to measure the level of engagement of stakeholders during socially-oriented projects’ execution. It may allow better accountability, transparency and stakeholder satisfaction. For this purpose, the study seeks to explore key concepts and ideas about participatory management in socially-oriented projects, and Freeman’s (Strategic Management: a stakeholder approach. Pitman, Boston, 1984) stakeholder theory, in addition to essential principles of the AA1000 framework. It is therefore a piece of conceptual research based on the proposal of a framework. This framework could in the near future be applied to organizations that need to expand their level of awareness of stakeholders’ satisfaction during the execution of organizational social responsibility and humanitarian project management they finance. It makes possible to understand the level of involvement of stakeholders. It is expected that the contributions made will be useful for researchers to propose new studies to improve the indicators presented here, as well as allow future studies to apply these indicators in social projects and in humanitarian initiatives.

[1]  R. Edward Freeman,et al.  Stakeholder Theory, Fact/Value Dichotomy, and the Normative Core: How Wall Street Stops the Ethics Conversation , 2012 .

[2]  Raquel da Silva Pereira.  Responsabilidade social empresarial e empresa sustentável: da teoria à prática , 2010 .

[3]  Erika Costa da Silva Gaudeoso,et al.  IMPLEMENTAÇÃO E GESTÃO DE PROJETOS SOCIAIS , 2014 .

[4]  R. Freeman.  Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach , 2010 .

[5]  Chris Roche.  Avaliação de impacto dos trabalhos de ONGs: aprendendo a valorizar as mudanças , 2000 .

[6]  R. Pena,et al.  Responsabilidade social empresarial: teoria e prática. , 2005 .

[7]  M. Clarkson.  A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance , 1995 .

[8]  A. Wicks,et al.  Stakeholder Theory, Value, and Firm Performance , 2013, Business Ethics Quarterly.

[9]  Carol H. Weiss.  Evaluation : methods for studying programs and policies , 1997 .

[10]  Adriana Leiras,et al.  Literature review of humanitarian logistics research: trends and challenges , 2014 .

[11]  Rubens da Costa Santos,et al.  Mensurando Valor e Performance na Prestação de Serviços Sociais , 2004 .

[12]  Joseph Sarkis,et al.  Models for compassionate operations , 2012 .

[13]  L. Preston,et al.  The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications , 1995 .

[14]  M. V. Marrewijk.  Concepts and definitions of CSR and corporate sustainability: Between agency and communion , 2013 .

[15]  Leidy E. Klotz,et al.  Social Sustainability Considerations during Planning and Design: Framework of Processes for Construction Projects , 2013 .

[16]  Andreas Rasche,et al.  A Discourse Ethical Perspective on Social Accounting— The Case of the “Global Eight” , 2008 .

[17]  A. Carroll.  A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance , 1979 .

[18]  Markus Biehl,et al.  Thoughts on the Evaluation of Corporate Social Performance Through Projects , 2012 .

[19]  Marcelo Esteves Alves.  Responsabilidade social empresarial e empresa sustentável: da teoria à prática , 2009 .

[20]  Renata Buarque Goulart Coutinho,et al.  Projetos sociais de empresas no Brasil: arcabouço conceitual para pesquisas empíricas e análises gerenciais , 2006 .

[21]  R. Buchholz,et al.  Toward a Contemporary Conceptual Framework for Stakeholder Theory , 2005 .

[22]  A. Gunasekaran,et al.  The sustainable humanitarian supply chain design: agility, adaptability and alignment , 2016 .