Fine-Grained Location-Free Planarization in Wireless Sensor Networks

Extracting planar graph from network topologies is of great importance for efficient protocol design in wireless ad hoc and sensor networks. Previous techniques of planar topology extraction are often based on ideal assumptions, such as UDG communication model and accurate node location measurements. To make these protocols work effectively in practice, we need extract a planar topology in a location-free and distributed manner with small stretch factors. The planar topologies constructed by current location-free methods often have large stretch factors. In this paper, we present a fine-grained and location-free network planarization method under ρ-quasi-UDG communication model with ρ≥1/√2. Compared with existing location-free planarization approaches, our method can extract a provably connected planar graph, called topological planar simplification (TPS), from the connectivity graph in a fine-grained manner using local connectivity information. We evaluate our design through extensive simulations and compare with the state-of-the-art approaches. The simulation results show that our method produces high-quality planar graphs with a small stretch factor in practical large-scale networks.

[1]  Stefan Funke,et al.  Network sketching or: "How Much Geometry Hides in Connectivity?--Part II" , 2007, SODA '07.

[2]  Young-Jin Kim,et al.  Geographic routing made practical , 2005, NSDI.

[3]  Yunhao Liu,et al.  Topological detection on wormholes in wireless ad hoc and sensor networks , 2009, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[4]  Leonidas J. Guibas,et al.  GLIDER: gradient landmark-based distributed routing for sensor networks , 2005, Proceedings IEEE 24th Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies..

[5]  Jie Gao,et al.  Boundary recognition in sensor networks by topological methods , 2006, MobiCom '06.

[6]  Roger Wattenhofer,et al.  Worst-Case optimal and average-case efficient geometric ad-hoc routing , 2003, MobiHoc '03.

[7]  Gunnar E. Carlsson,et al.  Topological estimation using witness complexes , 2004, PBG.

[8]  Ivan Stojmenovic,et al.  Routing with Guaranteed Delivery in Ad Hoc Wireless Networks , 1999, DIALM '99.

[9]  Brad Karp,et al.  GPSR: greedy perimeter stateless routing for wireless networks , 2000, MobiCom '00.

[10]  Xinbing Wang,et al.  Edge Self-Monitoring for Wireless Sensor Networks , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems.

[11]  Yunhao Liu,et al.  Distributed Coverage in Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks by Topological Graph Approaches , 2012, IEEE Trans. Computers.

[12]  Roger Wattenhofer,et al.  A log-star distributed maximal independent set algorithm for growth-bounded graphs , 2008, PODC '08.

[13]  David C. Moore,et al.  Robust distributed network localization with noisy range measurements , 2004, SenSys '04.

[14]  Norishige Chiba,et al.  A Linear Algorithm for Embedding Planar Graphs Using PQ-Trees , 1985, J. Comput. Syst. Sci..

[15]  János Pach,et al.  Which Crossing Number Is It Anyway? , 1998, J. Comb. Theory, Ser. B.

[16]  Leonidas J. Guibas,et al.  Landmark Selection and Greedy Landmark-Descent Routing for Sensor Networks , 2007, IEEE INFOCOM 2007 - 26th IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications.

[17]  Stefan Funke,et al.  Guaranteed-Delivery Geographic Routing Under Uncertain Node Locations , 2007, IEEE INFOCOM 2007 - 26th IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications.

[18]  Anxiao Jiang,et al.  Robust Planarization of Unlocalized Wireless Sensor Networks , 2008, IEEE INFOCOM 2008 - The 27th Conference on Computer Communications.

[19]  Xiang-Yang Li,et al.  Localized Delaunay Triangulation with Application in Ad Hoc Wireless Networks , 2003, IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst..

[20]  Brian D. O. Anderson,et al.  Wireless sensor network localization techniques , 2007, Comput. Networks.

[21]  Anxiao Jiang,et al.  Separability and Topology Control of Quasi Unit Disk Graphs , 2007, INFOCOM.