Evolution of an elemental theory of Pavlovian conditioning

Kenneth Spence (1936, 1937) formalized a quantitative, elemental approach to association theory that has had a broad and dominating influence on learning theory for many years. A set of challenges to the basic approach has spurred the subsequent evolution of elemental theory in various ways. Four of the challenges and some resulting theoretical accommodations are described in the context of Pavlovian conditioning. The evolution involves departures from important specifics of Spence’s theory, but is viewed as demonstrating the utility of the basic, elemental approach that is one of his legacies.

[1]  K. Spence.  The nature of discrimination learning in animals. , 1936 .

[2]  K. Spence.  The differential response in animals to stimuli varying within a single dimension. , 1937 .

[3]  J. Konorski.  Conditioned reflexes and neuron organization. , 1948 .

[4]  R. R. Bush,et al.  A model for stimulus generalization and discrimination. , 1951, Psychological review.

[5]  K W SPENCE,et al.  The nature of the response in discrimination learning. , 1952, Psychological review.

[6]  A. R. Wagner,et al.  Performance in eyelid conditioning following interpolated presentations of the UCS. , 1957, Journal of experimental psychology.

[7]  A. R. Wagner,et al.  Supplementary report: Effect of interpolated UCS trials in eyelid conditioning without a ready signal , 1959 .

[8]  I. Gormezano,et al.  Nictitating Membrane: Classical Conditioning and Extinction in the Albino Rabbit , 1962, Science.

[9]  C. N. Uhl,et al.  EFFECT OF OVERLAPPING CUES UPON DISCRIMINATION LEARNING. , 1964, Journal of experimental psychology.

[10]  K. Haberlandt,et al.  Stimulus selection in animal discrimination learning. , 1968, Journal of Experimental Psychology.

[11]  D. Robbins.  Stimulus selection in human discrimination learning and transfer. , 1970 .

[12]  A. R. Wagner,et al.  CS habituation produces a “latent inhibition effect” but no active “conditioned inhibition” , 1972 .

[13]  R. Rescorla.  "Configural" conditioning in discrete-trial bar pressing. , 1972, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[14]  A. R. Wagner,et al.  Negative patterning in classical conditioning: Summation of response tendencies to isolable and configurai components , 1972 .

[15]  R. Rescorla,et al.  A theory of Pavlovian conditioning : Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement , 1972 .

[16]  W. Estes.  Memory and conditioning. , 1973 .

[17]  W. R. Garner.  The Processing of Information and Structure , 1974 .

[18]  M. A. Saavedra.  Pavlovian compound conditioning in the rabbit , 1975 .

[19]  K. Spence.  Behavior Theory and Conditioning , 1978 .

[20]  J. Pearce.  A model for stimulus generalization in Pavlovian conditioning. , 1987, Psychological review.

[21]  A. R. Wagner,et al.  Evolution of a structured connectionist model of Pavlovian conditioning (AESOP). , 1989 .

[22]  G. Lynch,et al.  The neurobiology of learning and memory , 1989, Cognition.

[23]  S. Klein,et al.  Pavlovian conditioning and the status of traditional learning theory , 1991 .

[24]  J. Pearce,et al.  Failure of excitatory conditioning to extinguish the influence of a conditioned inhibitor. , 1991 .

[25]  R. Shepard.  Integrality versus separability of stimulus dimensions: From an early convergence of evidence to a p , 1991 .

[26]  J. Pearce,et al.  Prototype Effects in Categorization by Pigeons , 1994 .

[27]  William K. Estes,et al.  Classification and cognition , 1994 .

[28]  J. Pearce.  Similarity and discrimination: a selective review and a connectionist model. , 1994, Psychological review.

[29]  W. Estes.  Toward a Statistical Theory of Learning. , 1994 .

[30]  E. Kehoe,et al.  Summation and configuration between and within sensory modalities in classical conditioning of the rabbit , 1994 .

[31]  J. Pearce,et al.  Summation in Autoshaping with Short- and Long-duration Stimuli , 1995 .

[32]  R. Rescorla,et al.  Summation in autoshaping , 1995 .

[33]  J. Pearce,et al.  Some determinants of response summation , 1997 .

[34]  R. Rescorla.  Summation: Assessment of a configural theory , 1997 .

[35]  J. Pearce,et al.  Configural analysis of summation in autoshaping , 1997 .

[36]  Susan E. Brandon,et al.  Occasion setting: Influences of conditioned emotional responses and configural cues. , 1998 .

[37]  Edgar H Vogel,et al.  A componential view of configural cues in generalization and discrimination in Pavlovian conditioning , 2000, Behavioural Brain Research.

[38]  A comparison of the Rescorla-Wagner and Pearce models in a negative patterning and a summation problem , 2001 .

[39]  J. Pearce,et al.  Summation: Further Assessment of a Configural Theory , 2002, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology.

[40]  J. Pearce.  Evaluation and development of a connectionist theory of configural learning , 2002, Animal learning & behavior.

[41]  M. Fanselow,et al.  Differential effects of adding and removing components of a context on the generalization of conditional freezing. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[42]  A. R. Wagner.  Context-Sensitive Elemental Theory , 2003, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology.

[43]  S. Glautier.  Asymmetry of generalization decrement in causal learning , 2004, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology.

[44]  Ralph R. Miller,et al.  Generalization Decrement in Human Contingency Learning , 2006, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[45]  Configural and elemental processing in associative learning: Commentary on Melchers, Shanks and Lachnit , 2008, Behavioural Processes.

[46]  P. I. Pavlov.  Conditioned reflexes: An investigation of the physiological activity of the cerebral cortex. , 1929, Annals of Neurosciences.