Risk, Ambiguity, and the Rank-Dependence Axioms

Choice problems in the spirit of Ellsberg (1961) suggest that rank-dependent ("Choquet expected utility") preferences over subjective gambles might be subject to the same difficulties that Ellsberg's earlier examples posed for subjective expected utility. These difficulties stem from event-separability properties that rank-dependent preferences partially retain from expected utility, and suggest that nonseparable models of preferences might be better at capturing features of behavior that lead to these paradoxes. (JEL D81)

[1]  Syngjoo Choi,et al.  Estimating Ambiguity Aversion in a Portfolio Choice Experiment , 2009 .

[2]  Melvyn Sim,et al.  A Satisficing Alternative to Prospect Theory , 2009 .

[3]  I. Erev,et al.  Comonotonic independence: The critical test between classical and rank-dependent utility theories , 1994 .

[4]  J. Hey,et al.  INVESTIGATING GENERALIZATIONS OF EXPECTED UTILITY THEORY USING EXPERIMENTAL DATA , 1994, Experiments in Economics.

[5]  M. Birnbaum Tests of rank-dependent utility and cumulative prospect theory in gambles represented by natural frequencies: Effects of format, event framing, and branch splitting , 2004 .

[6]  M. Birnbaum,et al.  Testing Descriptive Utility Theories: Violations of Stochastic Dominance and Cumulative Independence , 1998 .

[7]  Howard Kunreuther,et al.  Is imprecise knowledge better than conflicting expertise? Evidence from insurers’ decisions in the United States , 2010 .

[8]  Alain Chateauneuf,et al.  On the use of capacities in modeling uncertainty aversion and risk aversion , 1991 .

[9]  A. Zimper,et al.  Rational Expectations and Ambiguity: A Comment on Abel (2002) , 2004 .

[10]  Machina ’ s Reflection Example and VEU Preferences : a Very Short Note , 2008 .

[11]  Soo Hong Chew,et al.  Small worlds: Modeling attitudes toward sources of uncertainty , 2008, J. Econ. Theory.

[12]  Yutaka Nakamura Subjective expected utility with non-additive probabilities on finite state spaces , 1990 .

[13]  D. Ellsberg,et al.  Risk, ambiguity, and decision , 2001 .

[14]  Laetitia Placido,et al.  Ambiguity models and the machina paradoxes , 2011 .

[15]  D. Ellsberg Decision, probability, and utility: Risk, ambiguity, and the Savage axioms , 1961 .

[16]  L. J. Savage,et al.  The Foundations of Statistics , 1955 .

[17]  Risk, Ambiguity, and the Klibanoff Axioms , 2008 .

[18]  H. Fennema,et al.  A test of rank-dependent utility in the context of ambiguity , 1996 .

[19]  Edi Karni,et al.  Choquet Expected Utility with a Finite State Space: Commutativity and Act-Independence , 1994 .

[20]  J. Quiggin,et al.  Theories of Choice Under Ignorance and Uncertainty , 1992 .

[21]  Melvyn Sim,et al.  Dual representation of choice and aspirational preferences , 2010 .

[22]  M. Birnbaum,et al.  Evidence against Rank-Dependent Utility Theories: Tests of Cumulative Independence, Interval Independence, Stochastic Dominance, and Transitivity. , 1999, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[23]  Mohammed Abdellaoui,et al.  The Rich Domain of Uncertainty: Source Functions and Their Experimental Implementation , 2011 .

[24]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Recent developments in modeling preferences: Uncertainty and ambiguity , 1992 .

[25]  Olivier L’Haridon,et al.  An Allais paradox for generalized Expected Utility Theories , 2008 .

[26]  P. Wakker,et al.  The comonotonic sure-thing principle , 1996 .

[27]  George Wu,et al.  Competence effects for choices involving gains and losses , 2010 .

[28]  M. Birnbaum,et al.  New Paradoxes of Risky Decision Making , 2022 .

[29]  Uzi Segal,et al.  The Ellsberg Paradox and Risk Aversion: An Anticipated Utility Approach , 1987 .

[30]  Marciano M. Siniscalchi,et al.  Vector Expected Utility and Attitudes Toward Variation , 2008 .

[31]  Clemens Puppe,et al.  Decisions under risk and uncertainty: A survey of recent developments , 1992, ZOR Methods Model. Oper. Res..

[32]  M. Marinacci,et al.  A Smooth Model of Decision Making Under Ambiguity , 2003 .

[33]  Peter P. Wakker,et al.  The sure-thing principle and the comonotonic sure-thing principle: An axiomatic analysis☆ , 1996 .

[34]  Rakesh K. Sarin,et al.  A SIMPLE AXIOMATIZATION OF NONADDITIVE EXPECTED UTILITY , 1992 .

[35]  Martin Weber,et al.  Testing choquet expected utility , 1994 .

[36]  Peter Klibanoff,et al.  Stochastically independent randomization and uncertainty aversion , 2001 .

[37]  Peter P. Wakker,et al.  Preference Foundations for Nonexpected Utility: A Generalized and Simplified Technique , 2003, Math. Oper. Res..

[38]  Phan Hong Giang,et al.  A decision theory for partially consonant belief functions , 2011, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[39]  I. Gilboa,et al.  Maxmin Expected Utility with Non-Unique Prior , 1989 .

[40]  Ehud Lehrer,et al.  A New Integral for Capacities , 2005 .

[41]  Enrica Carbone,et al.  A Comparison of the Estimates of EU and non-EU Preference Functionals Using Data from Pairwise Choice and Complete Ranking Experiments , 1995 .

[42]  I. Gilboa Expected utility with purely subjective non-additive probabilities , 1987 .

[43]  J. Hey,et al.  A Comparison of the Estimates of Expected Utility and Non-Expected-Utility Preference Functionals , 1995 .

[44]  P. Wakker Testing and Characterizing Properties of Nonadditive Measures through Violations of the Sure-Thing Principle , 2001 .

[45]  P. Wakker,et al.  The Likelihood Method for Decision under Uncertainty , 2005 .

[46]  George Wu An empirical test of ordinal independence , 1994 .

[47]  A. A. J.Marley Independence Properties Vis-à-vis Several Utility Representations , 2004 .

[48]  John D. Hey,et al.  The descriptive and predictive adequacy of theories of decision making under uncertainty/ambiguity , 2010, Experiments in Economics.

[49]  Olivier L’Haridon,et al.  Betting on Machina’s reflection example: an experiment on ambiguity , 2010 .

[50]  David Schmeidleis SUBJECTIVE PROBABILITY AND EXPECTED UTILITY WITHOUT ADDITIVITY , 1989 .

[51]  Alexandre Street,et al.  On the Conditional Value-at-Risk probability-dependent utility function , 2010 .

[52]  Larry G. Epstein A definition of uncertainty aversion , 1999 .

[53]  M. Birnbaum,et al.  Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes Tests of Theories of Decision Making: Violations of Branch Independence and Distribution Independence Generic Rank-dependent Utility Generic Analysis of Violations of Branch Independence and Distribution Independence Birnbaum and Mcintosh Model: N , 2022 .