FOR THE DEGREE OF LICENTIATE OF ENGINEERING in Machine and Vehicle Systems Volunteer Muscle Activity in Dynamic Events Input Data for Human Body Models

Human body models (HBMs) are virtual human surrogates used to predict kinematic and injury responses during motor vehicle crashes. In recent years, active musculature has been incorporated into HBMs for enhanced biofidelity in simulated emergency scenarios, in particular low-severity crashes and pre-crash situations, where occupant responses are influenced by muscle tension. Development and validation of HBMs that simulate neuromuscular control requires information on muscle activation patterns and contraction levels for different loading levels and directions. This information can be acquired by measuring muscle activity in volunteers with electromyography in replicated pre-crash events. This thesis investigates occupant responses in various pre-crash type braking scenarios and multidirectional perturbations. Muscle activity was measured in volunteers in the following scenarios; maximum voluntary braking, autonomous braking with standard seatbelt, autonomous braking with reversible pre-tensioner activated 200 ms before braking, and seated perturbation in multiple directions without restraint. Muscle activity and forward displacement during autonomous braking was influenced by type of restraint system and role (passenger vs. driver). Pre-tensioning the seatbelt caused decreased forward displacement as well as increased startle like muscle activity in some volunteers. Active HBMs that model the startle reflex can elucidate its effect on injury risk in the crash phase. The difference in posture between drivers and passengers resulted in decreased upper extremity and increased lower back muscle activity for passengers and more forward displacement. Active HBMs validated against the data presented here can be used to further assess the difference between the two occupant roles and to aid the optimisation of safety systems for each group. The spatial tuning patterns generated from multidirectional perturbation showed variable activation amplitudes and preferred directions for the neck muscles. Implementing muscle and direction specific activation schemes in active HBMs might result in better prediction of the head and neck responses. The research outcomes provide data sets for active HBM validation in pre-crash braking events and the development and validation of omnidirectional models. Further studies that identify occupant muscle responses are needed. Measuring muscle activity during a pre-crash steering manoeuvre or during a realistic visual threat to identify the muscle responses following a startle reflex would support the advancement of future omnidirectional models and startle reflex control methods.

[1]  H A M Daanen,et al.  Volunteer kinematics and reaction in lateral emergency maneuver tests. , 2013, Stapp car crash journal.

[2]  Riender Happee,et al.  A method to model anticipatory postural control in driver braking events. , 2014, Gait & posture.

[3]  Yogesh Narayan,et al.  Analysis of low velocity frontal impacts. , 2003, Clinical biomechanics.

[4]  Matthew R. Maltese,et al.  Electromyography responses of pediatric and young adult volunteers in low-speed frontal impacts. , 2013, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[5]  P. Schmitt,et al.  Human Anatomy and Physiology, ed 2 , 1977 .

[6]  K. Brolin,et al.  The Effect of Muscle Activation on Neck Response , 2005, Traffic injury prevention.

[7]  Riender Happee,et al.  Modelling of bracing in a multi-body active human model , 2013 .

[8]  J. Blouin,et al.  Electromyography of superficial and deep neck muscles during isometric, voluntary, and reflex contractions. , 2007, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[9]  D. Stegeman,et al.  Motor unit potential contribution to surface electromyography. , 1997, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[10]  Susumu Ejima,et al.  Influence of the Driver Conditions on the Injury Outcome in Front Impact Collisions , 2011 .

[11]  J. B. Wheeler,et al.  Cervical muscle response during whiplash: evidence of a lengthening muscle contraction. , 2000, Clinical biomechanics.

[12]  D. Bose,et al.  Influence of pre-collision occupant parameters on injury outcome in a frontal collision. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[13]  Gunter P Siegmund,et al.  Loud preimpact tones reduce the cervical multifidus muscle response during rear-end collisions: a potential method for reducing whiplash injuries. , 2015, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[14]  Gunter P Siegmund,et al.  The startle response during whiplash: a protective or harmful response? , 2012, Journal of applied physiology.

[15]  Susumu Ejima,et al.  Effects of pre-impact swerving/steering on physical motion of the volunteer in the low-speed side-impact sled test , 2012 .

[16]  Dario Farina,et al.  Interpretation of the Surface Electromyogram in Dynamic Contractions , 2006, Exercise and sport sciences reviews.

[17]  Alan T Dibb,et al.  Pediatric Head and Neck Dynamics in Frontal Impact: Analysis of Important Mechanical Factors and Proposed Neck Performance Corridors for 6- and 10-Year-Old ATDs , 2014, Traffic injury prevention.

[18]  Jaap H van Dieën,et al.  Methodological aspects of SEMG recordings for force estimation--a tutorial and review. , 2010, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[19]  Peter Blanch,et al.  Intramuscular fine-wire electromyography during cycling: repeatability, normalisation and a comparison to surface electromyography. , 2010, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[20]  S. Kumar,et al.  Role of awareness in head-neck acceleration in low velocity rear-end impacts. , 2000, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[21]  J. Blouin,et al.  Startle responses elicited by whiplash perturbations , 2006, The Journal of physiology.

[22]  Susumu Ejima,et al.  A study on occupant kinematics behaviour and muscle activities during pre-impact braking based on volunteer tests , 2007 .

[23]  Narayan Yoganandan,et al.  Stabilizing Effect of Precontracted Neck Musculature in Whiplash , 2006, Spine.

[24]  Adam Wittek,et al.  Hill-type Muscle Model for Analysis of Mechanical Effect of Muscle Tension on the Human Body Response in a Car Collision Using an Explicit Finite Element Code , 2000 .

[25]  J. S. Lee,et al.  Cervical electromyographic activity during low-speed rear impact , 1999, European Spine Journal.

[26]  David J. Sanderson,et al.  Awareness Affects the Response of Human Subjects Exposed to a Single Whiplash-Like Perturbation , 2003, Spine.

[27]  Wolfgang Sinz,et al.  Muscle Activation Onset Latencies and Amplitudes during Lane Change in a Full Vehicle Test , 2013 .

[28]  J. Blouin,et al.  Interaction between acoustic startle and habituated neck postural responses in seated subjects. , 2007, Journal of applied physiology.

[29]  J. Blouin,et al.  Auditory Startle Alters the Response of Human Subjects Exposed to a Single Whiplash-like Perturbation , 2006, Spine.

[30]  Carlo J. De Luca,et al.  The Use of Surface Electromyography in Biomechanics , 1997 .

[31]  Jac Wismans,et al.  The Occupant Response to Autonomous Braking: A Modeling Approach That Accounts for Active Musculature , 2012, Traffic injury prevention.

[32]  A. Burden How should we normalize electromyograms obtained from healthy participants? What we have learned from over 25 years of research. , 2010, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[33]  Susumu Ejima,et al.  Prediction of the physical motion on human body based on muscle activities during pre-impact braking , 2008 .

[34]  Karin Brolin,et al.  A Human Body Model With Active Muscles for Simulation of Pretensioned Restraints in Autonomous Braking Interventions , 2015, Traffic injury prevention.

[35]  J. Blouin,et al.  Head and neck control varies with perturbation acceleration but not jerk: implications for whiplash injuries , 2009, The Journal of physiology.

[36]  N. Teasdale,et al.  Attenuation of human neck muscle activity following repeated imposed trunk-forward linear acceleration , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[37]  Daniel Vélez Día,et al.  Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement , 2013 .

[38]  Shrawan Kumar,et al.  The effect of seat belt use on the cervical electromyogram response to whiplash-type impacts. , 2006, Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics.

[39]  V. Der,et al.  Human head neck response in frontal, lateral and rear end impact loading : modelling and validation , 2002 .

[40]  T. Szabo,et al.  Human Subject Kinematics and Electromyographic Activity During Low Speed Rear Impacts , 1996 .

[41]  Yuko Nakahira,et al.  Development of a human body finite element model with multiple muscles and their controller for estimating occupant motions and impact responses in frontal crash situations. , 2012, Stapp car crash journal.

[42]  B A Winkelstein,et al.  An anatomical investigation of the human cervical facet capsule, quantifying muscle insertion area , 2001, Journal of anatomy.

[43]  Stefan M Duma,et al.  Effects of Bracing on Human Kinematics in Low-Speed Frontal Sled Tests , 2011, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[44]  Alan T Dibb,et al.  Importance of Muscle Activations for Biofidelic Pediatric Neck Response in Computational Models , 2013, Traffic injury prevention.

[45]  Yogesh Narayan,et al.  An Electromyographic Study of Low-Velocity Rear-End Impacts , 2002, Spine.

[46]  Gunter P Siegmund,et al.  Are cervical multifidus muscles active during whiplash and startle? An initial experimental study , 2008, BMC musculoskeletal disorders.

[47]  Karin Brolin,et al.  The importance of muscle tension on the outcome of impacts with a major vertical component , 2008 .

[48]  D. Sanderson,et al.  The effect of perturbation acceleration and advance warning on the neck postural responses of seated subjects , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[49]  Daniel Talmor,et al.  Injury thresholds after motor vehicle crash--important factors for patient triage and vehicle design. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[50]  J. T. Inglis,et al.  Rapid neck muscle adaptation alters the head kinematics of aware and unaware subjects undergoing multiple whiplash-like perturbations. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.