Remote monitoring of cardiac implantable electronic devices and disease management

Abstract This reviews the transition of remote monitoring of patients with cardiac electronic implantable devices from curiosity to standard of care. This has been delivered by technology evolution from patient-activated remote interrogations at appointed intervals to continuous monitoring that automatically flags clinically actionable information to the clinic for review. This model has facilitated follow-up and received professional society recommendations. Additionally, continuous monitoring has provided a new level of granularity of diagnostic data enabling extension of patient management from device to disease management. This ushers in an era of digital medicine with wider applications in cardiovascular medicine.

[1]  T. Glotzer,et al.  2023 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS Expert Consensus Statement on Practical Management of the Remote Device Clinic , 2023, Journal of arrhythmia.

[2]  H. Crijns,et al.  Time of onset of atrial fibrillation and atrial fibrillation progression data from the RACE V study , 2023, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[3]  C. Hansen,et al.  The patient perspective on remote monitoring of implantable cardiac devices , 2023, Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine.

[4]  J. Halperin,et al.  Predicting Malignant Ventricular Arrhythmias Using Real-Time Remote Monitoring. , 2023, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[5]  S. Narayan,et al.  Reduction in long-term mortality using remote device monitoring in a large real-world population of patients with implantable defibrillators , 2023, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[6]  M. Gold,et al.  Utilization of remote monitoring among patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy and comparison between Asia and the Americas , 2022, Heart rhythm O2.

[7]  G. Boriani,et al.  Smartphone-based cardiac implantable electronic device remote monitoring: improved compliance and connectivity , 2022, European heart journal. Digital health.

[8]  G. Boriani,et al.  Current status of reimbursement practices for remote monitoring of cardiac implantable electrical devices across Europe , 2022, Europace.

[9]  U. Schotten,et al.  Early diagnosis and better rhythm management to improve outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation: the 8th AFNET/EHRA consensus conference , 2022, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[10]  H. Heidbuchel,et al.  How to use digital devices to detect and manage arrhythmias: an EHRA practical guide. , 2022, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[11]  C. Rinaldi,et al.  EHRA consensus on prevention and management of interference due to medical procedures in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices. , 2022, Europace.

[12]  Akshay S. Desai,et al.  The GUIDE-HF trial of pulmonary artery pressure monitoring in heart failure: impact of the COVID-19 pandemic , 2022, European heart journal.

[13]  G. Boriani,et al.  Implantable cardioverter defibrillators and devices for cardiac resynchronization therapy: what perspective for patients’ apps combined with remote monitoring? , 2022, Expert review of medical devices.

[14]  U. Schotten,et al.  A VIRTUAL Sleep Apnoea management pathway For the work-up of Atrial fibrillation patients in a digital Remote Infrastructure: VIRTUAL-SAFARI. , 2021, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[15]  G. Boriani,et al.  Digital literacy as a potential barrier to implementation of cardiology tele-visits after COVID-19 pandemic: the INFO-COVID survey , 2021, Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC.

[16]  C. Israel,et al.  2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy. , 2021, European heart journal.

[17]  Akshay S. Desai,et al.  Haemodynamic-guided management of heart failure (GUIDE-HF): a randomised controlled trial , 2021, The Lancet.

[18]  S. Pedersen,et al.  Effect of remote monitoring on clinical outcomes in European heart failure patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: secondary results of the REMOTE-CIED randomized trial , 2021, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[19]  É. Marijon,et al.  The use of remote monitoring of cardiac implantable devices during the COVID-19 pandemic: an EHRA physician survey , 2021, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[20]  L. Calò,et al.  Combining home monitoring temporal trends from implanted defibrillators and baseline patient risk profile to predict heart failure hospitalizations: results from the SELENE HF study , 2021, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[21]  M. Turakhia,et al.  Performance of first pacemaker to use smart device app for remote monitoring , 2021, Heart rhythm O2.

[22]  D. Lanctin,et al.  Clinic time required to manage remote monitoring of cardiac implantable electronic devices: impact of outsourcing initial data review and triage , 2021, EP Europace.

[23]  S. Valsecchi,et al.  Scheduled versus alert transmissions for remote follow-up of cardiac implantable electronic devices: Clinical relevance and resource consumption. , 2021, International journal of cardiology.

[24]  R. Tieleman,et al.  Early atrial fibrillation detection and the transition to comprehensive management. , 2021, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[25]  L. Stevenson,et al.  Remote Hemodynamic‐Guided Therapy of Patients With Recurrent Heart Failure Following Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy , 2021, Journal of the American Heart Association.

[26]  N. Varma,et al.  Alert-Based ICD Follow-Up: A Model of Digitally Driven Remote Patient Monitoring. , 2021, JACC Clinical Electrophysiology.

[27]  J. Brachmann,et al.  Atrial Fibrillation Burden and Clinical Outcomes in Heart Failure: The CASTLE-AF Trial. , 2021, JACC. Clinical electrophysiology.

[28]  M. de Melis,et al.  Clinic Time Required for Remote and In-Person Management of Patients With Cardiac Devices: Time and Motion Workflow Evaluation , 2021, JMIR cardio.

[29]  Robert E. Rich,et al.  2021 ISHNE/HRS/EHRA/APHRS collaborative statement on mHealth in Arrhythmia Management: Digital Medical Tools for Heart Rhythm Professionals , 2021, Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc.

[30]  P. Sanders,et al.  Remote Monitoring Alert Burden: An Analysis of Transmission in >26,000 Patients. , 2020, JACC. Clinical electrophysiology.

[31]  Yu-Chen Huang,et al.  Role of Remote Monitoring in Detection of Atrial Arrhythmia, Stroke Reduction, and Use of Anticoagulation Therapy - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. , 2020, Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society.

[32]  K. Vernooy,et al.  Implementation of an on-demand app-based heart rate and rhythm monitoring infrastructure for the management of atrial fibrillation through teleconsultation: TeleCheck-AF , 2020, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[33]  Zekeriya Erkin,et al.  Remote monitoring of cardiac implanted electronic devices: legal requirements and ethical principles - ESC Regulatory Affairs Committee/EHRA joint task force report. , 2020, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[34]  U. Schotten,et al.  Temporal patterns and short-term progression of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: data from RACE V , 2020, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[35]  S. Valsecchi,et al.  Implementation of remote follow-up of cardiac implantable electronic devices in clinical practice: organizational implications and resource consumption , 2020, Journal of cardiovascular medicine.

[36]  C. Jarvis,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of remote monitoring of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in France: a meta-analysis and an integrated economic model derived from randomized controlled trials. , 2020, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[37]  M. Ueda,et al.  Remote Management of Pacemaker Patients With Biennial In-Clinic Evaluation , 2020, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.

[38]  G. Boriani,et al.  Intrahospital organizational model of remote monitoring data sharing, for a global management of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: a document of the Italian Association of Arrhythmology and Cardiac Pacing. , 2020, Journal of cardiovascular medicine.

[39]  G. Giannola,et al.  Outsourcing the Remote Management of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices: Medical Care Quality Improvement Project , 2019, JMIR cardio.

[40]  A. Capucci,et al.  Are Atrial High-Rate Episodes Associated With Increased Risk of Ventricular Arrhythmias and Mortality? , 2019, JACC. Clinical electrophysiology.

[41]  G. Boriani,et al.  Temporal patterns of premature atrial complexes predict atrial fibrillation occurrence in bradycardia patients continuously monitored through pacemaker diagnostics , 2019, Internal and Emergency Medicine.

[42]  J. Denollet,et al.  Effect of remote monitoring on patient-reported outcomes in European heart failure patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: primary results of the REMOTE-CIED randomized trial. , 2019, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[43]  S. Anker,et al.  Remote monitoring of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and resynchronization devices to improve patient outcomes: dead end or way ahead? , 2019, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[44]  M. Pombo,et al.  Safety and efficiency of a common and simplified protocol for pacemaker and defibrillator surveillance based on remote monitoring only: a long-term randomized trial (RM-ALONE) , 2019, European heart journal.

[45]  N. Varma,et al.  How Well Do Results From Randomized Clinical Trials and/or Recommendations for Implantable Cardioverter‐Defibrillator Programming Diffuse Into Clinical Practice? , 2019, Journal of the American Heart Association.

[46]  A. Lazarus,et al.  Role of medical reaction in management of inappropriate ventricular arrhythmia diagnosis: the inappropriate Therapy and HOme monitoRiNg (THORN) registry , 2019, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[47]  P. Della Bella,et al.  Organizational model and reactions to alerts in remote monitoring of cardiac implantable electronic devices: A survey from the Home Monitoring Expert Alliance project , 2018, Clinical cardiology.

[48]  C. Igel,et al.  Predicting electrical storms by remote monitoring of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patients using machine learning , 2018, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[49]  M. Walsh,et al.  Cybersecurity vulnerabilities of cardiac implantable electronic devices: Communication strategies for clinicians-Proceedings of the Heart Rhythm Society's Leadership Summit. , 2018, Heart rhythm.

[50]  A. Capucci,et al.  Does the CHA2DS2-VASc score reliably predict atrial arrhythmias? Analysis of a nationwide database of remote monitoring data transmitted daily from cardiac implantable electronic devices. , 2018, Heart rhythm.

[51]  G. Boriani,et al.  Risk stratification of cardiovascular and heart failure hospitalizations using integrated device diagnostics in patients with a cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator , 2018, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[52]  R. Schweikert,et al.  Automatic remote monitoring utilizing daily transmissions: transmission reliability and implantable cardioverter defibrillator battery longevity in the TRUST trial , 2018, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[53]  G. Lip,et al.  The increased risk of stroke/transient ischemic attack in women with a cardiac implantable electronic device is not associated with a higher atrial fibrillation burden , 2017, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[54]  S. Sacchi,et al.  Impact of haemodynamic SonR sensor on monitoring of left ventricular function in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy , 2017, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[55]  A. Capucci,et al.  Economic impact of remote monitoring after implantable defibrillators implantation in heart failure patients: an analysis from the EFFECT study , 2017, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[56]  Panos Vardas,et al.  Probing oral anticoagulation in patients with atrial high rate episodes: Rationale and design of the Non–vitamin K antagonist Oral anticoagulants in patients with Atrial High rate episodes (NOAH–AFNET 6) trial , 2017, American heart journal.

[57]  Philippe Mabo,et al.  Rationale and design of the Apixaban for the Reduction of Thrombo‐Embolism in Patients With Device‐Detected Sub‐Clinical Atrial Fibrillation (ARTESiA) trial , 2017, American heart journal.

[58]  J. Morgan,et al.  Remote management of heart failure using implantable electronic devices , 2017, European heart journal.

[59]  G. Hindricks,et al.  Daily remote monitoring of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: insights from the pooled patient-level data from three randomized controlled trials (IN-TIME, ECOST, TRUST) , 2017, European heart journal.

[60]  A. Curnis,et al.  Seasonal trends in atrial fibrillation episodes and physical activity collected daily with a remote monitoring system for cardiac implantable electronic devices. , 2017, International journal of cardiology.

[61]  Jagmeet P. Singh,et al.  A Multi‐Sensor Algorithm Predicts Heart Failure Events in Patients with Implanted Devices: Results from the MultiSENSE Study: 1 , 2017 .

[62]  Arnaud Lazarus,et al.  Optimizing Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Remote Monitoring: A Practical Guide. , 2017, JACC. Clinical electrophysiology.

[63]  Yi Zhang,et al.  A Multisensor Algorithm Predicts Heart Failure Events in Patients With Implanted Devices: Results From the MultiSENSE Study. , 2017, JACC. Heart failure.

[64]  Haran Burri,et al.  Effects of remote monitoring on clinical outcomes and use of healthcare resources in heart failure patients with biventricular defibrillators: results of the MORE‐CARE multicentre randomized controlled trial , 2017, European journal of heart failure.

[65]  A. Curnis,et al.  Stroke incidence in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices remotely controlled with automatic alerts of atrial fibrillation. A sub-analysis of the HomeGuide study. , 2016, International journal of cardiology.

[66]  D. Lacroix,et al.  Impact of remote monitoring on reducing the burden of inappropriate shocks related to implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead fractures: insights from a French single-centre registry. , 2016, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[67]  Michael Böhm,et al.  Fluid status telemedicine alerts for heart failure: a randomized controlled trial. , 2016, European heart journal.

[68]  A. Burgun,et al.  Personalized and automated remote monitoring of atrial fibrillation. , 2016, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[69]  N. Dayal,et al.  Low risk of electromagnetic interference between smartphones and contemporary implantable cardioverter defibrillators. , 2016, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[70]  Catherine Klersy,et al.  Effect of telemonitoring of cardiac implantable electronic devices on healthcare utilization: a meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials in patients with heart failure , 2016, European journal of heart failure.

[71]  D. Lacroix,et al.  Potential role of antitachycardia pacing alerts for the reduction of emergency presentations following shocks in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: implications for the implementation of remote monitoring. , 2015, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[72]  G. Lip,et al.  Randomized trial of atrial arrhythmia monitoring to guide anticoagulation in patients with implanted defibrillator and cardiac resynchronization devices. , 2015, European heart journal.

[73]  Renato Pietro Ricci,et al.  HRS Expert Consensus Statement on remote interrogation and monitoring for cardiovascular implantable electronic devices. , 2015, Heart rhythm.

[74]  R. Mahajan,et al.  Remote Monitoring of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes. , 2015, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[75]  G. Mairesse,et al.  Implementation and reimbursement of remote monitoring for cardiac implantable electronic devices in Europe: a survey from the health economics committee of the European Heart Rhythm Association. , 2015, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[76]  A. Capucci,et al.  Remote monitoring improves outcome after ICD implantation: the clinical efficacy in the management of heart failure (EFFECT) study. , 2015, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[77]  J. Siebermair,et al.  Remote monitoring of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators , 2015, Herz.

[78]  M. S. Baccillieri,et al.  Improving Atrial Fibrillation Detection in Patients with Implantable Cardiac Devices by Means of a Remote Monitoring and Management Application , 2014, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[79]  A. Curnis,et al.  Manpower and Outpatient Clinic Workload for Remote Monitoring of Patients with Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices: Data from the HomeGuide Registry , 2014, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[80]  R. Ricci,et al.  Implantable cardioverter defibrillator remote monitoring is well accepted and easy to use during long-term follow-up , 2014, Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology.

[81]  H. Heidbuchel,et al.  EuroEco (European Health Economic Trial on Home Monitoring in ICD Patients): a provider perspective in five European countries on costs and net financial impact of follow-up with or without remote monitoring , 2014, European heart journal.

[82]  G. Hindricks,et al.  Implant-based multiparameter telemonitoring of patients with heart failure (IN-TIME): a randomised controlled trial , 2014, The Lancet.

[83]  Frank Beckers,et al.  Cryptogenic stroke and underlying atrial fibrillation. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[84]  G. Boriani,et al.  Ventricular rate monitoring as a tool to predict and prevent atrial fibrillation-related inappropriate shocks in heart failure patients treated with cardiac resynchronisation therapy defibrillators , 2014, Heart.

[85]  Niraj Varma,et al.  Superiority of automatic remote monitoring compared with in-person evaluation for scheduled ICD follow-up in the TRUST trial - testing execution of the recommendations , 2014, European heart journal.

[86]  G. Hindricks,et al.  Quarterly vs. yearly clinical follow-up of remotely monitored recipients of prophylactic implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: results of the REFORM trial , 2013, European heart journal.

[87]  B. Wilkoff,et al.  Cost efficiency and reimbursement of remote monitoring: a US perspective. , 2013, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[88]  C. Lau,et al.  Remote monitoring of cardiac implantable devices in the Asia-Pacific. , 2013, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[89]  Richard Sutton,et al.  Remote monitoring as a key innovation in the management of cardiac patients including those with implantable electronic devices. , 2013, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[90]  N. Varma Automatic remote home monitoring of implantable cardioverter defibrillator lead and generator function: a system that tests itself everyday. , 2013, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[91]  R. Ricci,et al.  Workflow, time and patient satisfaction from the perspectives of home monitoring. , 2013, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[92]  P. Brugada,et al.  Automatic remote monitoring: milestones reached, paths to pave. , 2013, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[93]  Panos Vardas,et al.  Remote monitoring costs, benefits, and reimbursement: a European perspective. , 2013, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[94]  H. Burri Remote follow-up and continuous remote monitoring, distinguished. , 2013, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[95]  H. Burri,et al.  Cost–consequence analysis of daily continuous remote monitoring of implantable cardiac defibrillator and resynchronization devices in the UK , 2013, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[96]  William T. Abraham,et al.  Development and validation of an integrated diagnostic algorithm derived from parameters monitored in implantable devices for identifying patients at risk for heart failure hospitalization in an ambulatory setting , 2013, European heart journal.

[97]  Dominique Lacroix,et al.  Costs of remote monitoring vs. ambulatory follow-ups of implanted cardioverter defibrillators in the randomized ECOST study , 2013, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[98]  G. Baumann,et al.  Workload and usefulness of daily, centralized home monitoring for patients treated with CIEDs: results of the MoniC (Model Project Monitor Centre) prospective multicentre study. , 2013, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[99]  Renato Pietro Ricci,et al.  Effectiveness of remote monitoring of CIEDs in detection and treatment of clinical and device-related cardiovascular events in daily practice: the HomeGuide Registry , 2013, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[100]  B. Stambler,et al.  Same-day discovery of implantable cardioverter defibrillator dysfunction in the TRUST remote monitoring trial: influence of contrasting messaging systems , 2012, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[101]  Dominique Lacroix,et al.  A randomized study of remote follow-up of implantable cardioverter defibrillators: safety and efficacy report of the ECOST trial , 2012, European heart journal.

[102]  Niraj Varma,et al.  Remote monitoring of cardiovascular devices: a time and activity analysis. , 2012, Heart rhythm.

[103]  C. De Laet,et al.  Legal and organizational aspects of remote cardiac monitoring: the example of implantable cardioverter defibrillators. , 2012, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[104]  Finn Kensing,et al.  Patient satisfaction and suggestions for improvement of remote ICD monitoring , 2012, Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology.

[105]  A. Capucci,et al.  Subclinical atrial fibrillation and the risk of stroke. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[106]  G. Breithardt,et al.  ISHNE/EHRA Expert Consensus on Remote Monitoring of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices (CIEDs) , 2012, Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc.

[107]  Philippe Mabo,et al.  A randomized trial of long-term remote monitoring of pacemaker recipients (The COMPAS trial) , 2011, European heart journal.

[108]  P. Kirchhof,et al.  Healthcare personnel resource burden related to in-clinic follow-up of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices: a European Heart Rhythm Association and Eucomed joint survey. , 2011, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[109]  P. Brugada,et al.  Remote monitoring: a cost or an investment? , 2011, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[110]  Haran Burri,et al.  Device therapy and hospital reimbursement practices across European countries: a heterogeneous scenario. , 2011, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[111]  A. Boyle,et al.  The CONNECT (Clinical Evaluation of Remote Notification to Reduce Time to Clinical Decision) trial: the value of wireless remote monitoring with automatic clinician alerts. , 2011, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[112]  Frieder Braunschweig,et al.  Acute haemodynamic effects of increase in paced heart rate in heart failure patients recorded with an implantable haemodynamic monitor. , 2011, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[113]  Akshay S. Desai,et al.  Connecting the circle from home to heart-failure disease management. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[114]  K. Ellenbogen,et al.  Downloadable Software Algorithm Reduces Inappropriate Shocks Caused by Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Lead Fractures: A Prospective Study , 2010, Circulation.

[115]  R. Schweikert,et al.  Automatic Remote Monitoring of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Lead and Generator Performance: The Lumos-T Safely RedUceS RouTine Office Device Follow-Up (TRUST) Trial , 2010, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.

[116]  R. Schweikert,et al.  Efficacy and Safety of Automatic Remote Monitoring for Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Follow-Up: The Lumos-T Safely Reduces Routine Office Device Follow-Up (TRUST) Trial , 2010, Circulation.

[117]  Frieder Braunschweig,et al.  Continuous Monitoring of Intrathoracic Impedance and Right Ventricular Pressures in Patients With Heart Failure , 2010, Circulation. Heart failure.

[118]  Bernhard Fahn,et al.  Device-based impedance measurement is a useful and accurate tool for direct assessment of intrathoracic fluid accumulation in heart failure. , 2010, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[119]  Renato Pietro Ricci,et al.  Long-term patient acceptance of and satisfaction with implanted device remote monitoring. , 2010, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[120]  Christopher E Hilker,et al.  Incidence of Newly Detected Atrial Arrhythmias via Implantable Devices in Patients With a History of Thromboembolic Events , 2010, Stroke.

[121]  M. Santini,et al.  Home Monitoring in Patients with Implantable Cardiac Devices: Is There a Potential Reduction of Stroke Risk? Results from a Computer Model Tested Through Monte Carlo Simulations , 2009, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[122]  Haran Burri,et al.  Remote monitoring and follow-up of pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators , 2009, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[123]  N. Varma Remote Monitoring for Advisories: Automatic Early Detection of Silent Lead Failure , 2009, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[124]  N. Varma,et al.  Prevalence of Cancelled Shock Therapy and Relationship to Shock Delivery in Recipients of Implantable Cardioverter‐Defibrillators Assessed by Remote Monitoring , 2009, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[125]  A. Schirdewan,et al.  Potential role of home monitoring to reduce inappropriate shocks in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patients due to lead failure. , 2008, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[126]  Renato Pietro Ricci,et al.  Remote control of implanted devices through Home Monitoring technology improves detection and clinical management of atrial fibrillation. , 2008, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[127]  G. Hindricks,et al.  Influence of Home Monitoring on the clinical status of heart failure patients: Design and rationale of the IN‐TIME study , 2008, European journal of heart failure.

[128]  M. Linnaluoto,et al.  Remote monitoring of implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients: a safe, time-saving, and cost-effective means for follow-up , 2008, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[129]  Silvia G Priori,et al.  HRS/EHRA Expert Consensus on the Monitoring of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices (CIEDs): description of techniques, indications, personnel, frequency and ethical considerations: developed in partnership with the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) and the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) , 2008, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[130]  P. Neužil,et al.  Early automatic remote detection of combined lead insulation defect and ICD damage. , 2008, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[131]  M. Santini,et al.  Home monitoring remote control of pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients in clinical practice: impact on medical management and health-care resource utilization. , 2008, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[132]  William T. Abraham,et al.  Direct Left Atrial Pressure Monitoring in Ambulatory Heart Failure Patients: Initial Experience With a New Permanent Implantable Device , 2007, Circulation.

[133]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Intrathoracic impedance monitoring to predict decompensated heart failure. , 2007, The American journal of cardiology.

[134]  C. Lau,et al.  Intrathoracic Impedance Monitoring in Patients With Heart Failure: Correlation With Fluid Status and Feasibility of Early Warning Preceding Hospitalization , 2005, Circulation.

[135]  W. Abraham,et al.  Continuous Autonomic Assessment in Patients With Symptomatic Heart Failure: Prognostic Value of Heart Rate Variability Measured by an Implanted Cardiac Resynchronization Device , 2004, Circulation.

[136]  J. Murabito,et al.  Temporal Relations of Atrial Fibrillation and Congestive Heart Failure and Their Joint Influence on Mortality The Framingham Heart Study , 2003, Circulation.

[137]  D. Theuns,et al.  Home monitoring in ICD therapy: future perspectives. , 2003, Europace.

[138]  L. Rydén,et al.  Ongoing right ventricular hemodynamics in heart failure: clinical value of measurements derived from an implantable monitoring system. , 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[139]  Stefan Sack,et al.  A novel method--the activity log index--for monitoring physical activity of patients with heart failure. , 2002, The American journal of cardiology.

[140]  A. Camm,et al.  Transtelephonic Interrogation of the Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator , 1992, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[141]  S. Furman,et al.  Transtelephone pacemaker clinic. , 1971, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[142]  G. Lip,et al.  Remote monitoring of cardiac implantable electronic devices in Europe: results of the European Heart Rhythm Association survey. , 2014, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[143]  J. Nielsen,et al.  ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy , 2014 .

[144]  A. Waldo Remote monitoring of implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients: a safe, time-saving, and cost-effective means for follow-up , 2009 .

[145]  H. Katus,et al.  What is the "optimal" follow-up schedule for ICD patients? , 2005, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.