Evaluating building-related symptoms using the US EPA BASE study results.

UNLABELLED In order to develop baseline data about United States office buildings, the United States Environmental Protection Agency conducted the Building Assessment Survey Evaluation (BASE) study, a systematic survey of 100 randomly selected United States office buildings, in the 1990s. This paper analyzes the self-reported work-related symptoms and job and workplace characteristics of 4326 respondents and compares results to the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health's (NIOSH) study of 80 'complaint' buildings. Four distinct groups of symptoms, representing 'tiredness', 'mucosal irritation', 'neuropsychological', and 'lower respiratory' conditions emerged from factor analysis of work-related symptoms. The symptom grouping is identical for both surveys. Although the prevalence of each symptom is significantly higher in the NIOSH than in the BASE sample, there is overlap of the symptom distributions. In the BASE survey, 45% of the work force reported at least one work-related health symptom; 20% reported at least three symptoms. These findings imply that it is counterproductive to dichotomize buildings into healthy vs. unhealthy; instead the prevalence of health problems related to buildings span a continuum. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS These results indicate that most office buildings have occupants who report building-related symptoms. This paper provides practical guidance for the comparison of building prevalences to the BASE normative data. Work-related symptom distributions and symptom groups can improve investigators' ability to identify IEQ problems.

[1]  K. Andersson,et al.  Epidemiological Approach to Indoor Air Problems , 1998 .

[2]  G. Dunteman,et al.  Association of Personal and Workplace Characteristics with Health, Comfort And Odor: A Survey of 3948 Office Workers in Three Buildings , 1993 .

[3]  A Hedge,et al.  Sick building syndrome: a study of 4373 office workers. , 1987, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[4]  J. Jaakkola,et al.  The Office Environment Model: A Conceptual Analysis of the Sick Building Syndrome* , 1998 .

[5]  D K Milton,et al.  Risk of sick leave associated with outdoor air supply rate, humidification, and occupant complaints. , 2000, Indoor air.

[6]  Kenneth M. Wallingford,et al.  The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Indoor Environmental Evaluation Experience. Part Three: Associations between Environmental Factors and Self-Reported Health Conditions , 1996 .

[7]  Hal Levin,et al.  Improving the health of workers in indoor environments: priority research needs for a national occupational research agenda. , 2002, American journal of public health.

[8]  M. Mendell,et al.  Environmental risk factors and work-related lower respiratory symptoms in 80 office buildings: an exploratory analysis of NIOSH data. , 2003, American journal of industrial medicine.

[9]  R. Malkin,et al.  The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Indoor Environmental Evaluation Experience. Part Two: Symptom Prevalence , 1996 .

[10]  Mark J. Mendell,et al.  THE CALIFORNIA HEALTHY BUILDING STUDY, PHASE 1: A SUMMARY , 1993 .

[11]  O. Valbjørn,et al.  The “sick” building syndrome in the office environment: The Danish town hall study , 1987 .

[12]  Michael S. Crandall,et al.  The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Indoor Environmental Evaluation Experience. Part One: Building Environmental Evaluations , 1996 .

[13]  J. D. Spengler,et al.  ESTIMATES OF POTENTIAL NATIONWIDE PRODUCTIVITY AND HEALTH BENEFITS FROM BETTER INDOOR ENVIRONMENTS: AN UPDATE , 1999 .