Is there a body of evidence for the treatment of patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS)?

Historically, the treatment options for AIS, the most common form of scoliosis are; exercises; in-patient rehabilitation; braces and surgery. While there is evidence in the form of prospective controlled studies that Scoliosis Intensive Rehabilitation (SIR) and braces can alter the natural history of the condition, there is no prospective controlled study comparing the natural history with surgical treatment.One aim of the Scoliosis Society (SOSORT) should be; to help develop a body of research regarding the outcomes of conservative and operative treatment as well, and to highlight the problems of treatment indications in patients with AIS and other spinal deformities. Another aim is to help to improve the safety of patients who have surgery. By producing evidence-based information that can be used to develop guidelines that could aid both professionals and patients in making decisions about surgical and conservative options.Although 'Scoliosis' is the official journal of the SOSORT and is the main forum for experts in the field of conservative management of patients with spinal deformities, there needs to be more wide spread attempt to develop a fuller body of evidence focussing on spine surgery as well.

[1]  J. Heine,et al.  Langzeitergebnisse der konservativen Behandlung der Skoliose mit dem Chêneau-Korsett , 1985 .

[2]  J. Webb,et al.  Changes in Surface and Radiographic Deformity After Universal Spine System for Right Thoracic Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Is Rib-Hump Reassertion a Mechanical Problem of the Thoracic Cage Rather Than an Effect of Relative Anterior Spinal Overgrowth? , 2001, Spine.

[3]  S. Weinstein,et al.  Health and function of patients with untreated idiopathic scoliosis: a 50-year natural history study. , 2003, JAMA.

[4]  D. Gardner-Bonneau,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy of Non-Operative Treatments for Idiopathic Scoliosis*† , 1997, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[5]  V. Raso,et al.  Long-term follow-up of surgically treated AIS patients. , 2002, Studies in Health Technology and Informatics.

[6]  O. Boachie-Adjei,et al.  Results of Surgical Treatment of Adult Idiopathic Scoliosis With Low Back Pain and Spinal Stenosis: A Study of Long-term Clinical Radiographic Outcomes , 2003, Spine.

[7]  J. Heine,et al.  [Long-term results of the conservative treatment of scoliosis using the Chêneau brace]. , 1985, Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie und ihre Grenzgebiete.

[8]  M. Ylikoski,et al.  Comparison of Long-Term Functional and Radiologic Outcomes After Harrington Instrumentation and Spondylodesis in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Review of 78 Patients , 2002, Spine.

[9]  E. Fogarty,et al.  Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: The Effect of Brace Treatment on the Incidence of Surgery , 2001, Spine.

[10]  C. Wimmer,et al.  Estimating the final outcome of brace treatment for idiopathic thoracic scoliosis at 6-month follow-up , 2003, Pediatric rehabilitation.

[11]  E. Fogarty,et al.  Scoliosis: a review , 2008, Pediatric Surgery International.

[12]  M. Ylikoski,et al.  Harrington and Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Long-term functional and radiographic outcomes. , 2003, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[13]  Stuart L. Weinstein,et al.  Surgical Rates After Observation and Bracing for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: An Evidence-Based Review , 2007, Spine.

[14]  J. Dickson,et al.  Harrington instrumentation and arthrodesis for idiopathic scoliosis. A twenty-one-year follow-up. , 1990, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[15]  L. Twomey,et al.  Scoliosis: a review. , 1982, The Australian journal of physiotherapy.

[16]  H. Weiss,et al.  Incidence of surgery in conservatively treated patients with scoliosis , 2003, Pediatric rehabilitation.

[17]  E. Porrini,et al.  Randomized Controlled Study Comparing Reduced Calcineurin Inhibitors Exposure Versus Standard Cyclosporine-Based Immunosuppression , 2007, Transplantation.

[18]  A. Nachemson,et al.  Results of surgical treatment of adults with idiopathic scoliosis. , 1987, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[19]  J. Bettany.  Topographical, Kinesiological and Psychological Factors in the Surgical Management of Adolescent ldiopat hic Scoliosk , 1994 .

[20]  K. Wood,et al.  Rotational Changes of the Vertebral‐Pelvic Axis Following Cotrel‐Dubousset Instrumentation , 1991, Spine.

[21]  M. Rigo,et al.  Effect of conservative management on the prevalence of surgery in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis , 2003, Pediatric rehabilitation.

[22]  Katsushi Takeshita,et al.  Conservative treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: can it reduce the incidence of surgical treatment? , 2003, Pediatric rehabilitation.

[23]  P. Korovessis,et al.  Effects of the Combined VDS-Zielke and Harrington Operation on the Frontal Rib Cage Deformity of Double Major Curves in Idiopathic Scoliosis , 1995, Spine.

[24]  Munish C. Gupta,et al.  Rotational Changes of the Vertebral Pelvic Axis After Sublaminar Instrumentation in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis , 1997, Spine.

[25]  H. Weiss.  Rehabilitation of adolescent patients with scoliosis—what do we know? A review of the literature , 2003, Pediatric rehabilitation.

[26]  H. Weiss,et al.  Correction effects of the ScoliOlogiC® „Chêneau light" brace in patients with scoliosis , 2007, Scoliosis.

[27]  A. Nachemson,et al.  Effectiveness of treatment with a brace in girls who have adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. A prospective, controlled study based on data from the Brace Study of the Scoliosis Research Society. , 1995, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[28]  K. Wood,et al.  Thoracic Volume Changes in Scoliosis Surgery , 1996, Spine.

[29]  A. Nachemson,et al.  A Prospective Study of Brace Treatment Versus Observation Alone in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Follow-up Mean of 16 Years After Maturity , 2007, Spine.

[30]  M. Hawes.  The use of exercises in the treatment of scoliosis: an evidence-based critical review of the literature , 2003, Pediatric rehabilitation.

[31]  F. Castro,et al.  Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, bracing, and the Hueter-Volkmann principle. , 2003, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[32]  S. Weinstein,et al.  Professional Opinion Concerning the Effectiveness of Bracing Relative to Observation in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis , 2007, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[33]  L. Lenke,et al.  The Use of Pedicle Screw Fixation to Improve Correction in the Lumbar Spine of Patients With Idiopathic Scoliosis: Is It Warranted? , 1996, Spine.

[34]  F. Petermann,et al.  Incidence of curvature progression in idiopathic scoliosis patients treated with scoliosis in-patient rehabilitation (SIR): an age- and sex-matched controlled study , 2003, Pediatric rehabilitation.

[35]  Achim Elfering,et al.  Nonoperative Treatment for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A 10- to 60-Year Follow-up With Special Reference to Health-Related Quality of Life , 2006, Spine.

[36]  M. Rigo,et al.  The chêneau concept of bracing--actual standards. , 2008, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[37]  M. Hawes,et al.  Impact of spine surgery on signs and symptoms of spinal deformity , 2006, Pediatric rehabilitation.

[38]  D. Burton,et al.  Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: natural history and long term treatment effects , 2006, Scoliosis.