Altered Actin Centripetal Retrograde Flow in Physically Restricted Immunological Synapses

Antigen recognition by T cells involves large scale spatial reorganization of numerous receptor, adhesion, and costimulatory proteins within the T cell-antigen presenting cell (APC) junction. The resulting patterns can be distinctive, and are collectively known as the immunological synapse. Dynamical assembly of cytoskeletal network is believed to play an important role in driving these assembly processes. In one experimental strategy, the APC is replaced with a synthetic supported membrane. An advantage of this configuration is that solid structures patterned onto the underlying substrate can guide immunological synapse assembly into altered patterns. Here, we use mobile anti-CD3ε on the spatial-partitioned supported bilayer to ligate and trigger T cell receptor (TCR) in live Jurkat T cells. Simultaneous tracking of both TCR clusters and GFP-actin speckles reveals their dynamic association and individual flow patterns. Actin retrograde flow directs the inward transport of TCR clusters. Flow-based particle tracking algorithms allow us to investigate the velocity distribution of actin flow field across the whole synapse, and centripetal velocity of actin flow decreases as it moves toward the center of synapse. Localized actin flow analysis reveals that, while there is no influence on actin motion from substrate patterns directly, velocity differences of actin are observed over physically trapped TCR clusters. Actin flow regains its velocity immediately after passing through confined TCR clusters. These observations are consistent with a dynamic and dissipative coupling between TCR clusters and viscoelastic actin network.

[1]  S. Boxer,et al.  Micropatterning Fluid Lipid Bilayers on Solid Supports , 1997, Science.

[2]  Colin R. F. Monks,et al.  Three-dimensional segregation of supramolecular activation clusters in T cells , 1998, Nature.

[3]  Jerry L. Prince,et al.  Snakes, shapes, and gradient vector flow , 1998, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[4]  Jerry L. Prince,et al.  Generalized gradient vector flow external forces for active contours , 1998, Signal Process..

[5]  S. Bromley,et al.  The immunological synapse: a molecular machine controlling T cell activation. , 1999, Science.

[6]  A. Diaspro Confocal and two-photon microscopy : foundations, applications, and advances , 2001 .

[7]  L. Samelson,et al.  Dynamic actin polymerization drives T cell receptor-induced spreading: a role for the signal transduction adaptor LAT. , 2001, Immunity.

[8]  S. Boxer,et al.  Micropattern formation in supported lipid membranes. , 2002, Accounts of chemical research.

[9]  James B. Pawley,et al.  Confocal and two‐photon microscopy: Foundations, applications and advances , 2002 .

[10]  Mark M. Davis,et al.  Dynamics of the immunological synapse: finding, establishing and solidifying a connection. , 2002, Current opinion in immunology.

[11]  Edward Roy Pike,et al.  Confocal and Two-Photon Microscopy: Foundations, Applications, and Advances , 2002 .

[12]  Tetsuo Yamazaki,et al.  T cell receptor ligation induces the formation of dynamically regulated signaling assemblies , 2002, The Journal of cell biology.

[13]  K. Mossman,et al.  Altered TCR Signaling from Geometrically Repatterned Immunological Synapses , 2005, Science.

[14]  E. Sackmann,et al.  Viscoelasticity of entangled actin networks studied by long-pulse magnetic bead microrheometry. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[15]  Rajat Varma,et al.  Actin and agonist MHC–peptide complex–dependent T cell receptor microclusters as scaffolds for signaling , 2005, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[16]  Takashi Saito,et al.  Newly generated T cell receptor microclusters initiate and sustain T cell activation by recruitment of Zap70 and SLP-76 , 2005, Nature Immunology.

[17]  Ronald D. Vale,et al.  Single-Molecule Microscopy Reveals Plasma Membrane Microdomains Created by Protein-Protein Networks that Exclude or Trap Signaling Molecules in T Cells , 2005, Cell.

[18]  V. Barr,et al.  Dynamic molecular interactions linking the T cell antigen receptor to the actin cytoskeleton , 2005, Nature Immunology.

[19]  Claire M Brown,et al.  Probing the integrin-actin linkage using high-resolution protein velocity mapping , 2006, Journal of Cell Science.

[20]  Jake M. Hofman,et al.  Nonmuscle myosin IIA-dependent force inhibits cell spreading and drives F-actin flow. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[21]  Rajat Varma,et al.  T cell receptor-proximal signals are sustained in peripheral microclusters and terminated in the central supramolecular activation cluster. , 2006, Immunity.

[22]  Dylan T Burnette,et al.  Myosin II functions in actin-bundle turnover in neuronal growth cones , 2006, Nature Cell Biology.

[23]  Cheng-han Yu,et al.  Curvature-modulated phase separation in lipid bilayer membranes. , 2006, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[24]  Andreas R. Bausch,et al.  Microstructure and viscoelasticity of confined semiflexible polymer networks , 2006 .

[25]  Daniel A. Fletcher,et al.  Reversible stress softening of actin networks , 2007, Nature.

[26]  D. Billadeau,et al.  Regulation of T-cell activation by the cytoskeleton , 2007, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[27]  Gaudenz Danuser,et al.  Differential Transmission of Actin Motion Within Focal Adhesions , 2007, Science.

[28]  Rajat Varma,et al.  Mechanisms for segregating T cell receptor and adhesion molecules during immunological synapse formation in Jurkat T cells , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  S. Bunnell,et al.  T cell costimulation via the integrin VLA-4 inhibits the actin-dependent centralization of signaling microclusters containing the adaptor SLP-76. , 2008, Immunity.

[30]  K. Mossman,et al.  T cell receptor microcluster transport through molecular mazes reveals mechanism of translocation. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[31]  Roger D. Kamm,et al.  Computational Analysis of Viscoelastic Properties of Crosslinked Actin Networks , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[32]  Jay T. Groves,et al.  Cluster size regulates protein sorting in the immunological synapse , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  Ken Jacobson,et al.  Actin-myosin viscoelastic flow in the keratocyte lamellipod. , 2009, Biophysical journal.

[34]  Jay T. Groves,et al.  Spatial organization and signal transduction at intercellular junctions , 2010, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[35]  Joe W. Gray,et al.  Restriction of Receptor Movement Alters Cellular Response: Physical Force Sensing by EphA2 , 2010, Science.