A technique to assess the changeability of complex engineering systems

An approach to cope with changing market needs is to design engineering systems that can be changed easily. However, in order to identify suitable candidates to be made more changeable, one has to be able to analyse the changeability of engineering systems. Hence, this paper introduces a dependency modelling technique that seeks to support companies in assessing the changeability of complex engineering systems. The research was carried out based on the design research methodology with a focus on method development. The primary result of this work is the provision of a design support that can be used to provide an estimation of system changeability by examining (1) the initiating points of change, (2) the direct propagation of change, (3) the indirect propagation of change, (4) the likelihood of change, and (5) the impact or effort of change. The technique developed uses a matrix-based approach and draws on the change prediction method to generate change indices for individual system components. By referring to the change indices generated, the changeability of engineering systems can be examined systematically. A heavy-duty diesel engine is used in this work as an example to demonstrate how the technique can be applied.

[1]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Engineering design methods , 1989 .

[2]  S. Sanderson,et al.  Managing product families: The case of the Sony Walkman , 1995 .

[3]  Albert Albers,et al.  Contact and Channel Modelling to support the design of technical systems , 2009 .

[4]  Christian Weber,et al.  A MATRIX REPRESENTATION OF THE CPM/PDD APPROACH AS A MEANS FOR CHANGE IMPACT ANALYSIS , 2008 .

[5]  T Eger.  Design freeze during product development: supporting change prediction during detail design , 2005 .

[6]  Yao-Tsung Ko,et al.  A structural matrix-based modelling for designing product variety , 2011 .

[7]  K. Ulrich,et al.  Planning for Product Platforms , 1998 .

[8]  William Miller,et al.  Flexibility in Engineering Design , 2012 .

[9]  Albert Albers,et al.  Contact and Channel Modeling to Support Early Design of Technical Systems , 2009 .

[10]  Claudia Eckert,et al.  Change Propagation Analysis in Complex Technical Systems , 2009 .

[11]  Gang Chen,et al.  Change propagation algorithm in a unified feature modeling scheme , 2008, Comput. Ind..

[12]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  A Network Approach to Define Modularity of Components in Complex Products , 2007 .

[13]  David W. Rosen,et al.  On combinatorial design spaces for the configuration design of product families , 2001, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[14]  Shamkant B. Navathe,et al.  C-FAR, change favorable representation , 2000, Comput. Aided Des..

[15]  P. John Clarkson,et al.  A method to assess the effects of engineering change propagation , 2012 .

[16]  Kamel Rouibah,et al.  Change management in concurrent engineering from a parameter perspective , 2003, Comput. Ind..

[17]  P. Clarkson,et al.  Predicting change propagation in complex design , 2004 .

[18]  Eun Suk Suh,et al.  Flexible product platforms: framework and case study , 2007 .

[19]  Claudia Eckert,et al.  Assessing design strategies from a change propagation perspective , 2008 .

[20]  Kristin L. Wood,et al.  Functional Interdependence and Product Similarity Based on Customer Needs , 1999 .

[21]  Maik Maurer,et al.  Structural Awareness in Complex Product Design , 2007 .

[22]  Joshua D. Summers,et al.  Predicting requirement change propagation, using higher order design structure matrices: an industry case study , 2012 .

[23]  Joshua D. Summers,et al.  Reasons for change propagation: a case study in an automotive OEM , 2012 .

[24]  Mitchell M. Tseng,et al.  Understanding product family for mass customization by developing commonality indices , 2000 .

[25]  Daniel D. Frey,et al.  Empirical evaluation of procedures to generate flexibility in engineering systems and improve lifecycle performance , 2013 .

[26]  Kristin L. Wood,et al.  A heuristic method for identifying modules for product architectures , 2000 .

[27]  Armin P. Schulz,et al.  Design for changeability (DfC): Principles to enable changes in systems throughout their entire lifecycle , 2005, Syst. Eng..

[28]  Joshua D. Summers,et al.  Case Study Method for Design Research: A Justification , 2008 .

[29]  Ali K. Kamrani,et al.  Macro level product development using design for modularity , 1999 .

[30]  Olivier L. de Weck,et al.  4.3.2 Platform identification using Design Structure Matrices , 2006 .

[31]  Ecy Koh.  Managing change propagation in the development of complex products , 2010 .

[32]  René Keller.  Predicting change propagation : algorithms, representations, software tools , 2007 .

[33]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  A Unified Information Model for Product Family Design Management , 2005, DAC 2005.

[34]  Pj Clarkson,et al.  Component classification: A change perspective , 2007 .

[35]  Elim Liu,et al.  A structural component-based approach for designing product family , 2005, Comput. Ind..

[36]  Joseph H. Saleh,et al.  Flexibility: a multi-disciplinary literature review and a research agenda for designing flexible engineering systems , 2009 .

[37]  Ali A. Yassine,et al.  A Framework for Design Process Specifications Management , 1999 .

[38]  Lucienne Blessing,et al.  DRM, a Design Research Methodology , 2009 .

[39]  Thomas F. Stahovich,et al.  RedesignIT—A Model-Based Tool for Managing Design Changes , 2004 .

[40]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  Assessing Variable Levels of Platform Commonality Within a Product Family Using a Multiobjective Genetic Algorithm , 2004, Concurr. Eng. Res. Appl..

[41]  Daniel E. Hastings,et al.  Defining changeability: Reconciling flexibility, adaptability, scalability, modifiability, and robustness for maintaining system lifecycle value , 2008, Syst. Eng..

[42]  P. John Clarkson,et al.  Change and customisation in complex engineering domains , 2004 .

[43]  Olivier L. de Weck,et al.  Multilayer network model for analysis and management of change propagation , 2011 .

[44]  A. Bischof,et al.  GUIDELINES FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF FLEXIBLE PRODUCTS , 2008 .

[45]  Kosuke Ishii,et al.  Design for variety: developing standardized and modularized product platform architectures , 2002 .

[46]  Olivier de Weck,et al.  Platform identification using Design Structure Matrices , 2005 .

[47]  Tyson R. Browning,et al.  Applying the design structure matrix to system decomposition and integration problems: a review and new directions , 2001, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[48]  Marc H. Meyer,et al.  The power of product platforms : building value and cost leadership , 1997 .

[49]  Steven B. Shooter,et al.  Platform-Based Design and Development: Current Trends and Needs in Industry , 2006, DAC 2006.

[50]  C. A. McMahon,et al.  Observations on Modes of Incremental Change in Design , 1994 .

[51]  Kevin Otto,et al.  An empirical foundation for product flexibility , 2005 .

[52]  P. John Clarkson,et al.  Change impact on a product and its redesign process: a tool for knowledge capture and reuse , 2013 .

[53]  Yoo Suk Hong,et al.  Design of Change-Absorbing System Architecture for the Design of Robust Products and Services , 2007, HCI.

[54]  Claudia Eckert,et al.  Engineering change: an overview and perspective on the literature , 2011 .

[55]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Product Design and Development , 1995 .

[56]  Louis L. Bucciarelli,et al.  Designing Engineers , 1994 .

[57]  Marin D. Guenov,et al.  Methods for engineering change propagation analysis , 2006 .