Complexity metrics to quantify semantic accuracy in segmented Landsat images

This paper addresses semantic accuracy in relation to images obtained with remote sensing. Semantic accuracy is defined in terms of map complexity. Complexity metrics are applied as a metric to measure complexity. The idea is that a homogeneous map of a low complexity is of a high semantic accuracy. In this study, complexity metrics like aggregation index, fragmentation index and patch size are applied on two images with different objectives, one from an agricultural area in the Netherlands, and one from a rural area in Kazakhstan. Images are segmented first using region merging segmentation. Effects on metrics and semantic accuracy are discussed. On the basis of well‐defined subsets, we conclude that the complexity metrics are suitable to quantify the semantic accuracy of the map. Segmentation is the most useful for an agricultural area including various agricultural fields. Metrics are mutually comparable being highly correlated, but showing some different aspects in quantifying map homogeneity and identifying objects of a high semantic accuracy.

[1]  F. Sabins Remote Sensing: Principles and Interpretation , 1987 .

[2]  T. M. Lillesand,et al.  Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation , 1980 .

[3]  Arnold K. Bregt,et al.  Comparison of complexity measures for choropleth maps , 1990 .

[4]  Russell G. Congalton,et al.  A practical look at the sources of confusion in error matrix generation , 1993 .

[5]  Andrew B. Watson,et al.  Digital images and human vision , 1993 .

[6]  J. Reynolds,et al.  A Simulation Experiment to Quantify Spatial Heterogeneity in Categorical Maps , 1994 .

[7]  Graham W. Horgan,et al.  Image analysis for the biological sciences , 1997 .

[8]  Ben Gorte Improving spectral image classifications by incorporating context data using likelihood vectors , 1995 .

[9]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Objective assessment of image quality. II. Fisher information, Fourier crosstalk, and figures of merit for task performance. , 1995, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[10]  F. D. van der Meer,et al.  Performance characteristics of the indicator classifier on simulated image data , 1996 .

[11]  S. T. Acton,et al.  On unsupervised segmentation of remotely sensed imagery using nonlinear regression , 1996 .

[12]  F. D. van der Meer,et al.  Classification of remotely-sensed imagery using an indicator kriging approach: application to the problem of calcite-dolomite mineral mapping , 1996 .

[13]  C. Woodcock,et al.  Combining Spectral and Texture Data in the Segmentation of Remotely Sensed Images , 1996 .

[14]  H. Barrett,et al.  List-mode likelihood: EM algorithm and image quality estimation demonstrated on 2-D PET , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[15]  Alfred Stein,et al.  Bayesian classification and class area estimation of satellite images using stratification , 1998, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[16]  Janet Franklin,et al.  The accuracy of vegetation stand boundaries derived from image segmentation in a desert environment , 1998 .

[17]  J. Bouma,et al.  A wavelet characterization of high-resolution NDVI patterns for precision agriculture , 2001 .

[18]  R. O'Neill,et al.  Landscape Ecology Explained@@@Landscape Ecology in Theory and Practice: Pattern and Process , 2001 .

[19]  Pi-Fuei Hsieh,et al.  Effect of spatial resolution on classification errors of pure and mixed pixels in remote sensing , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[20]  A. Stein,et al.  Spatial statistics for remote sensing , 2002 .

[21]  Alfred Stein,et al.  Existential uncertainty of spatial objects segmented from satellite sensor imagery , 2002, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[22]  Hong S. He,et al.  An aggregation index (AI) to quantify spatial patterns of landscapes , 2000, Landscape Ecology.

[23]  Bruce T. Milne,et al.  Indices of landscape pattern , 1988, Landscape Ecology.

[24]  J. Reynolds,et al.  A new contagion index to quantify spatial patterns of landscapes , 1993, Landscape Ecology.