In practice: how going digital will affect the dental office.

BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW The impact of digital imaging on dental practice depends upon the degree of planning conducted before implementation. Digital technologies have the potential to improve diagnosis; facilitate patient treatment procedures; and streamline storage, transfer and retrieval. These technologies also provide for secure backup of patients' image data, critical to re-establishing the practice should fire, flood or earthquake occur. CONCLUSIONS The decision to invest in digital radiographic equipment should be a simple one for dental practitioners. Although digital x-ray sensors have long equaled analog film for diagnostic tasks, they have several advantages over film radiography, including immediate image production with solid-state devices; interactive display on a monitor with the ability to enhance image features and make direct measurements; integrated storage with access to images through practice management software systems; security of available backup and off-site archiving; perfect radiographic duplicates to accompany referrals; security mechanisms to identify original images and differentiate them from altered images; the ability to tag information such as a patient identifier, date of exposure and other relevant details; and interoperability of the Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine file format. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS Most clinicians should contemplate integrating, at a minimum, intraoral digital x-ray sensors and a digital panoramic system into their practices.

[1]  Claudio M Levato Technology integration: a journey, not a destination. , 2002, Compendium of continuing education in dentistry.

[2]  A. Farman,et al.  Clinical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in dental practice. , 2006, Journal.

[3]  A G Farman,et al.  Fundamentals of image acquisition and processing in the digital era. , 2003, Orthodontics & craniofacial research.

[4]  Allan G Farman Raising standards: digital interoperability and DICOM. , 2005, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[5]  A Wenzel,et al.  Developments in radiographic caries diagnosis. , 1993, Journal of dentistry.

[6]  A. Farman Image-guidance ... the revolution in dental treatment facilitated by digital radiology. , 2006, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[7]  A. Farman,et al.  Comparison of complementary metal oxide semiconductor and charge-coupled device intraoral X-ray detectors using subjective image quality. , 2003, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[8]  G C Sanderink,et al.  Image quality of direct digital intraoral x-ray sensors in assessing root canal length. The RadioVisioGraphy, Visualix/VIXA, Sens-A-Ray, and Flash Dent systems compared with Ektaspeed films. , 1994, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.

[9]  Titus Schleyer,et al.  Integrating dental office technology: The next frontier , 2003 .

[10]  P. F. van der Stelt,et al.  Modern Radiographic Methods in the Diagnosis of Periodontal Disease , 1993 .

[11]  Yoshinori Arai,et al.  Clinical application of a new cone-beam computerized tomography system to assess multiple two-dimensional images for the preoperative treatment planning of maxillary implants: case reports. , 2004, Quintessence international.

[12]  Reinhilde Jacobs,et al.  State-of-the-art on cone beam CT imaging for preoperative planning of implant placement , 2006, Clinical Oral Investigations.