New metric for predicting target acquisition performance

The Johnson criteria have been shown to be fundamentally flawed due to their insensitivity to effects below the limiting frequency. This flaw makes predictions for many modern imaging systems inaccurate. A new target acquisition metric, the targeting task performance (TTP) metric, has been developed that provides better accuracy than the Johnson criteria. Further, unlike the Johnson criteria, the TTP metric can be applied directly to sampled imagers and to imagers that exhibit colored (spectrally weighted) noise due to frequency boost. Experimental data using both target recognition and target identification tasks show the problems with the Johnson criteria and illustrate the robust performance of the TTP metric. The simplicity of implementing a range performance model with the Johnson criteria is retained by the TTP metric while extending applicability of the model to sampled imagers and digital image enhancement.

[1]  J. Howard Johnson,et al.  Analysis of Image Forming Systems , 1985 .

[2]  D G Pelli,et al.  Why use noise? , 1999, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[3]  Manoj Raghavan,et al.  Sources of visual noise , 1995 .

[4]  A van Meeteren,et al.  Effects of pictorial noise interfering with visual detection. , 1988, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[5]  Keith A. Krapels,et al.  Target identification performance as a function of temporal and fixed pattern noise , 2001 .

[6]  Ronald G. Driggers,et al.  Influence of sampling on target recognition and identification , 1999 .

[7]  Keith A. Krapels,et al.  Target identification performance as a function of spurious response: aliasing with respect to the half sample rate , 2001, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[8]  R G Driggers,et al.  Equivalent blur as a function of spurious response of a sampled imaging system: application to character recognition. , 1999, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[9]  Lawrence E. Tannas,et al.  Flat-Panel Displays and Crts , 1985 .

[10]  R. Röhler,et al.  Untersuchung der Subjektiven Detailerkennbarkeit mit Hilfe der Ortsfrequenzfilterung , 1970 .

[11]  Eddie L. Jacobs,et al.  The Targeting Task Performance (TTP) Metric A New Model for Predicting Target Acquisition Performance , 2004 .

[12]  Harry L. Snyder,et al.  Image Quality: Measures and Visual Performance , 1985 .

[13]  B. Julesz,et al.  Spatial-frequency masking in vision: critical bands and spread of masking. , 1972, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[14]  Carl E. Halford,et al.  Guest Editorial: Special Section on Sampled Imaging Systems , 1999 .

[15]  Harry L. Snyder Image Quality and Observer Performance , 1973 .

[16]  H. L. Task,et al.  An Evaluation and Comparison of Several Measures of Image Quality for Television Displays , 1978 .

[17]  Peter G. J. Barten,et al.  Contrast sensitivity of the human eye and its e ects on image quality , 1999 .

[18]  Ronald G. Driggers,et al.  Improved image quality metric for predicting tactical vehicle indentification , 2000, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[19]  Keith A. Krapels,et al.  Target recognition performance as a function of sampling , 2001, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[20]  Carl E. Halford,et al.  Performance comparison of rectangular (4-point) and diagonal (2-point) dither , 2000, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[21]  Lucien M. Biberman Electro-optical imaging : system performance and modeling , 2001 .

[22]  Walter R. Lawson,et al.  Night Vision Laboratory Static Performance Model for Thermal Viewing Systems , 1975 .

[23]  James A. Ratches,et al.  Static Performance Model for Thermal Imaging Systems , 1976 .

[24]  K Krapels,et al.  Performance comparison of rectangular (four-point) and diagonal (two-point) dither in undersampled infrared focal plane array imagers. , 2001, Applied optics.

[25]  G. Seeley,et al.  Image Quality , 1989, [1989] Proceedings. The First International Conference on Image Management and Communication in Patient Care: Implementation and Impact.

[26]  G. Legge,et al.  Contrast discrimination in noise. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[27]  N. Nagaraja,et al.  Effect of Luminance Noise on Contrast Thresholds , 1964 .

[28]  R. Driggers,et al.  Introduction to Infrared and Electro-Optical Systems , 1998 .

[29]  Keith A. Krapels,et al.  Target identification performance as a function of low spatial frequency image content , 2000 .

[30]  J.A. Ratches,et al.  Target acquisition performance modeling of infrared imaging systems: past, present, and future , 2001, IEEE Sensors Journal.