Discussing course literature online: analysis of macro speech acts in an asynchronous computer conference

This paper presents a macro speech act analysis of computer-mediated conferencing on a university course on language pedagogy. Students read scholarly articles on language learning and discussed them online, in order to make sense of them collaboratively in preparation for a reflective essay. The study explores how the course participants made use of computer-mediated conferencing for such collaborative text processing. A discussion thread with 97 messages was analyzed for its macro speech acts. The conference messages were treated as pragmatic macrostructures where micro-level speech act sequences can be mapped onto a higher-level, global speech act or textual function. The discussion turned out to be reader-centred and practice-oriented. Approximately two thirds of the messages were concerned with interpreting theory from a practical point of view, expressing the students’ personal experience, opinion or idea about a certain issue related to the article. In comparison, only one tenth dealt with checking the explicit propositional content of the article. The results are interpreted in terms of the distinction between a narrative and paradigmatic/expository discourse.

[1]  Ann M. Johns,et al.  Genre in the Classroom : Multiple Perspectives , 2001 .

[2]  P. Tynjälä.  Writing, Learning And The Development Of Expertise In Higher Education , 2001 .

[3]  J. Searle.  Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts , 1979 .

[4]  Inger Lindberg.  Samtal och interaktion i ett andraspråksperspektiv , 2004 .

[5]  T. V. Dijk.  The Study of Discourse , 1997 .

[6]  C. Bazerman.  Speech Acts, Genres, and Activity Systems: How Texts Organize Activity and People , 2003 .

[7]  L. Lipponen,et al.  Practices and orientations of CSCL , 2004 .

[8]  A. Sfard.  On Two Metaphors for Learning and the Dangers of Choosing Just One , 1998 .

[9]  J. McNiff.  Action Research Principles and Practice , 1988 .

[10]  Neil Mercer,et al.  Words and Minds : How We Use Language to Think Together , 2000 .

[11]  Leo Van Lier,et al.  Action-based Teaching, Autonomy and Identity , 2007 .

[12]  J. McNiff,et al.  Action Research: Principles and Practice, (2nd ed.) , 2002 .

[13]  U. Felix.  E-learning pedagogy in the third millennium: the need for combining social and cognitive constructivist approaches , 2005, ReCALL.

[14]  Curtis J. Bonk,et al.  Communication in a web-based conferencing system: the quality of computer-mediated interactions , 2003, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[15]  Marlene Scardamalia,et al.  Computer Support for Knowledge-Building Communities , 1994 .

[16]  Gilly Salmon.  Approaches to researching teaching and learning online , 2001 .

[17]  J. Bruner.  Actual minds, possible worlds , 1985 .

[18]  Philip Eubanks.  Poetics and Narrativity: How Texts Tell Stories , 2003 .

[19]  R. Wegerif.  Dialogic Education and Technology: Expanding the Space of Learning , 2007 .

[20]  L. V. Lier.  Interaction in the Language Curriculum: Awareness, Autonomy and Authenticity , 1996 .

[21]  Päivi Tynjälä,et al.  Writing as a Learning Tool: Integrating Theory and Practice. Studies in Writing, Volume 7. , 2001 .

[22]  Maggie McPherson,et al.  Developing Innovation in Online Learning : An Action Research Framework , 2004 .

[23]  Timothy Koschmann,et al.  Cscl : Theory and Practice of An Emerging Paradigm , 1996 .

[24]  D. Garrison,et al.  Assessing Social Presence In Asynchronous Text-based Computer Conferencing , 1999 .

[25]  M. Scardamalia,et al.  The psychology of written composition , 1987 .

[26]  Jim Hewitt.  Beyond Threaded Discourse , 2001 .

[27]  R. Wegerif.  Dialogic Education and Technology , 2007 .

[28]  T. A. van Dijk.  Discourse as Structure and Process. Discourse Studies. A Multidisciplinary Introduction. Vol 1 , 1997 .

[29]  Maarit Saarenkunnas.  Multidimensional participation in polycontextual computer-supported language learning , 2004 .

[30]  Jo McDonough,et al.  Research Methods for English Language Teachers , 1997 .

[31]  Pierre Dillenbourg,et al.  What we know about CSCL and implementing it in higher education , 2004 .

[32]  Marysia Johnson.  A philosophy of second language acquisition , 2003 .

[33]  Päivi Häkkinen,et al.  Web-based Cases in Teaching and Learning – the Quality of Discussions and a Stage of Perspective Taking in Asynchronous Communication , 2002, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[34]  J. Bruner.  Acts of meaning , 1990 .

[35]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Macrorules for summarizing texts: the development of expertise , 1983 .

[36]  M. Turner.  The literary mind. , 1997 .

[37]  Chris Jones,et al.  Networked Learning: Perspectives and Issues , 2001 .

[38]  Martin Nystrand,et al.  Opening Dialogue: Understanding the Dynamics of Language and Learning in the English Classroom (Language and Literacy Series) , 1996 .

[39]  P. Kirschner,et al.  CSCL in higher education?: a framework for designing multiple collaborative environments , 2004 .

[40]  P. Robert-Jan Simons,et al.  The affordance of anchored discussion for the collaborative processing of academic texts , 2006, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[41]  G. Wells,et al.  "Dialogic Inquiry. Towards a Sociocultural Practice and Theory of Education", Gordon Wells, Cambridge 1999 : [recenzja] / Marta Marchow. , 2001 .